Skip to comments.
60 Minutes Has Used Bogus Memos In Past
The Washington Post ^
| 4/13/1999
Posted on 09/11/2004 12:31:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
Edited on 09/11/2004 1:07:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
For the second time in four months, CBS's "60 Minutes" has made an on-air apology regarding a report about drug smuggling. This time it's over a memo that turned out to be bogus.
Correspondent Lesley Stahl delivered the apology on Sunday's broadcast, as part of a settlement with a customs official who had sued the newsmagazine.
(Excerpt) Read more at pqasb.pqarchiver.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bogusmemo; cbsnews; medialies; seebs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
This article can be found in The Washington Post archives.....April 1999
To: blogblogginaway
2
posted on
09/11/2004 12:35:51 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(The Log Cabin Republicans AREN'T.)
To: blogblogginaway
SeeBS dosenm't report, they make the news.
3
posted on
09/11/2004 12:36:23 PM PDT
by
GaltMeister
(This is not my tagline. My family has it. The tagline belongs to my family.)
To: blogblogginaway
This sort of arrogant sloppiness is a result of excessive drug use among the jounalists of the 'Stonedest Generation'.
4
posted on
09/11/2004 12:36:36 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Thank you Rush Limbaugh-godfather of the New Media.)
To: blogblogginaway
The "Tiffany" network is turning into a pawn shop.
To: blogblogginaway
6
posted on
09/11/2004 12:40:44 PM PDT
by
Huck
(What's the typography, Kenneth?)
To: Prime Choice
7
posted on
09/11/2004 12:46:39 PM PDT
by
Angelwood
(FReepers are Everywhere! We Support Our Troops! (Hillary's Vast Rt Wg Conspiracy))
To: blogblogginaway
To: blogblogginaway
But that report, which was presented by Mike Wallace, cited a memo said to be written by Rudy Camacho I really think Chris Wallace should recuse himself from any interview and discussion of CBS and their newest fraud.
To: blogblogginaway
The documents used by CBS as well as their supposed vetting has been totally discredited..IMO their best bet is to retract and apologize to mitigate any possible damages...
yes I know dead people can't be defamed but it looks like a fraud on the family and the public to me as well as President Bush....Possibly the RNC could sue for loss of contributions...
Another possibility would be Unfair Business Practices, California has a liberal law against deceptive practices, Business & Profession Code Unfair Practices... anyone in the state has standing only need prove deception not fraud......probably easiest prove...
I would imagine Marcel Martel stating one thing in his "book" and then another on TV is deceptive...
interesting article on defaming the dead:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20040312.html
To: rolling_stone
And just think...before Rush/Fox/Internet, all of these stories would have been accepted at face value.
11
posted on
09/11/2004 1:28:57 PM PDT
by
Pete98
To: blogblogginaway
Good catch. Welcome to FR.
12
posted on
09/11/2004 1:30:32 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(Kerry-Edwards: FORGING AHEAD)
To: rolling_stone
I doubt the RNC will be able to sue for a loss of contributions, because there probably isn't any. Indeed, I strongly suspect that the RNC, like the Swiftvets, only grows richer when the DemonRats try to perpetrate frauds like this one.
To: Prime Choice; GaltMeister
We don't report the news. We MAKE the news!
You both nailed it!
To: rolling_stone
According to jmstein7, there are several federal laws which have been broken. This is really serious stuff, forging military documents.
15
posted on
09/11/2004 1:36:39 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(Sen.Miller said, "Bush is a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered steel")
To: CyberAnt
To: rolling_stone
According to jmstein7, there are several federal laws which have been broken. This is really serious stuff, forging military documents.
that may be true but the forger is one thing..unless you can prove conspiracy that lets Rather off the hook without some other cause of action..he needs to be visited by law enforcement and questioned..
To: blogblogginaway
FReepers,
Please keep up the posts. Also please support the websites that do the research to prove that these documents are frauds. We will win this. The MSM can't bury this. CBS will lose. Keep it up. Have faith. We will prevail!
To: blogblogginaway
Does it mention Mary Mapes? Was she possibly the producer of that story?
18
posted on
09/11/2004 1:55:11 PM PDT
by
EllaMinnow
(John Kerry won't be happy until he's made us all as miserable as he is.)
To: Right_in_Virginia
I really think Chris Wallace should recuse himself from any interview and discussion of CBS and their newest fraud"
Naw--'cause that means we can't use Ben Barne's kid or the Kiillian family.
19
posted on
09/11/2004 2:56:59 PM PDT
by
wildbill
To: Miss Marple; Howlin; PhiKapMom
20
posted on
09/11/2004 2:59:07 PM PDT
by
Diddle E. Squat
( "History? I love history! So sequential...")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson