Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man named in Bush memo left Guard before document was written
Dallas Morning News ^ | 9-10-04

Posted on 09/10/2004 7:06:51 PM PDT by ambrose

Posted on Fri, Sep. 10, 2004

Man named in Bush memo left Guard before document was written

BY PETE SLOVER

The Dallas Morning News

AUSTIN, Texas - (KRT) - The man named in a disputed memo as exerting pressure to "sugar coat" President Bush's military record left the Texas Air National Guard a year and a half before the memo was supposedly written, his own service record shows.

An order obtained by The Dallas Morning News shows that Col. Walter "Buck" Staudt was honorably discharged on March 1, 1972. CBS News reported this week that a memo in which Staudt was described as interfering with officers' negative evaluations of Bush's service, was dated Aug. 18, 1973.

That added to mounting questions about the authenticity of documents that seem to suggest Bush sought special favors and did not fulfill his service.

Staudt, who lives in New Braunfels, Texas, did not return calls seeking comment. His discharge paper was among a packet of documents obtained by The Dallas Morning News from official sources during 1999 research into Bush's Guard record.

A CBS staffer stood by the story, suggesting that Staudt could have continued to exert influence over Guard officials. But a former high-ranking Guard official disputed that, saying retirement would have left Staudt powerless over remaining officials.

The authenticity of the memo and three others included in Wednesday's "60 Minutes" report came in for heavy criticism Friday, prompting an unusual on-air defense of the original work. Experts on typography said they appeared to have been computer-drafted on equipment not available in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

And the family of the officer who supposedly wrote them, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who died in 1984, said it wasn't his nature to keep detailed personal notes.

In its network news broadcast Friday, CBS said the documents were supported by both unnamed witnesses and others, including document examiners.

Earlier, CBS anchor Dan Rather told The Dallas Morning News that he had heard nothing to make him question the legitimacy of the memos. He attributed the backlash to partisan politics and competitive journalism.

"This story is true. The questions we raised about then-Lieutenant Bush's National Guard service are serious and legitimate," he said, expressing confidence the memos are authentic. "Until and unless someone shows me definitive proof that they are not, I don't see any reason to carry on a conversation with the professional rumor mill."

The interview concluded before The Dallas Morning News determined the date of Staudt's departure, so that issue was not included. But a CBS staffer with extensive knowledge of the story said later that the departure doesn't derail the story.

"From what we've learned, Staudt remained very active after he retired," the staffer said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. "He was a very bullying type, and that could have continued."

In the "60 Minutes" report, Rather said of the memo's contents: "Killian says Col. Buck Staudt, the man in charge of the Texas Air National Guard, is putting on pressure to `sugar coat' an evaluation of Lt. Bush."

Staudt was the person Bush initially contacted about Guard service, and he was the group commander at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston when Bush arrived there to fly an F-102 jet. He later transferred to Austin, where he served as the chief of staff for the Air National Guard.

In the disputed memo, Killian supposedly wrote "(another officer) gave me a message today from group regarding Bush's (evaluation) and Staudt is pushing to sugar coat it."

It continues: "Austin is not happy either."

The CBS staffer said that the memo appears to recognize that Staudt has retired, since it differentiates between his displeasure and that of Austin, where he served his final Guard stint.

But another Texas Air National Guard official who served in that period said the memo appears to wrongly associate Staudt with his group command in Houston, and - based on that mistake - the memo distinguishes his views from that of the Austin Guard headquarters.

Retired Col. Earl Lively, who was director of Air National Guard operations for the state headquarters during 1972 and 1973 said Staudt "wasn't on the scene" after retirement, and that CBS' remote-bullying thesis makes no sense.

"He couldn't bully them. He wasn't in the Guard," Lively said. "He couldn't affect their promotions. Once you're gone from the Guard, you don't have any authority."

The report about the memos originally appeared to stir anew longstanding questions about Bush's Guard service, including whether he defied a direct order to take a physical exam, and whether his suspension from flying was partly for failure to meet military performance standards.

The campaign of Bush's Democratic rival, John Kerry, stood mostly mum, saying Bush should answer all questions about his service. Earlier this year, though, Kerry aides raised the exact points the memo seemed to address.

Bush has not commented publicly about the CBS report, and aides say his honorable discharge proves he fulfilled his obligations.

But the White House, which contends that all known records of Bush's service have been released, also took the unusual step of distributing the CBS memos to reporters the night of the broadcast.

"We don't know whether the (CBS) documents were fabricated or are authentic," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Friday.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; badoom; flushthejohns; forgery; goodriddance; killian; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; seebs; selectricgate; shotoverthebow; staudt; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
To: ambrose

Email this one to Drudge, to FOX, to the Wall St. Journal, to everyone...


21 posted on 09/10/2004 7:12:34 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
I was wondering when this was going to get picked up beyond this site. Sweet!

FR is cutting edge....give us a new pair of pajamas and we are good to go.

22 posted on 09/10/2004 7:13:01 PM PDT by Dog (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gilliam

If it's not....it's gonna!!!!!


23 posted on 09/10/2004 7:13:38 PM PDT by FlashBack (Faith will not make our path easy, but it will give us strength for the Journey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

You can submit a link right through Drudge's website. Go for it.... lol


24 posted on 09/10/2004 7:13:42 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The man named in a disputed memo as exerting pressure to "sugar coat" President Bush's military record left the Texas Air National Guard a year and a half before the memo was supposedly written, his own service record shows.

Nothing here to see, keep moving along.

Dan Rather has told us that we shouldn't nit pick the details as he is convinced the underlying story is correct!

Dan Rather, YOU ARE GOING DOWN!!!!

25 posted on 09/10/2004 7:13:45 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I hope you sent this to Drudge.


26 posted on 09/10/2004 7:14:02 PM PDT by Merry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Fox was on it earlier tonight.


27 posted on 09/10/2004 7:14:34 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

BUMP


28 posted on 09/10/2004 7:14:52 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

It's nice to see it printed in a big old newspaper, though, isn't it?


29 posted on 09/10/2004 7:14:53 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: proudmilitarymrs

Well, we've been doing show prep for the talk radio hosts for years, so it's only logical we do reserach for the lamestream media.


30 posted on 09/10/2004 7:14:56 PM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Early yesterday.

So far little new has broken that FR hasn't had a day before.


31 posted on 09/10/2004 7:15:08 PM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

32 posted on 09/10/2004 7:15:25 PM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name

Bernard Goldberg is on Scarborough Country and just said that "There is more diversity within Taliban than there is inside CBS." He said that CBS is behaving defensively and acting like they're trying to hide something, "circling the wagons."


33 posted on 09/10/2004 7:15:31 PM PDT by WashingtonSource (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The campaign of Bush's Democratic rival, John Kerry, stood mostly mum, saying Bush should answer all questions about his service.

Great idea, Lurch. You go first.

34 posted on 09/10/2004 7:16:07 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Someone needs to register CBS as a 527.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

My only question is why is the WH (Bush) acting so strangely about this?..."the White House, which contends that all known records of Bush's service have been released, also took the unusual step of distributing the CBS memos to reporters the night of the broadcast" Shouldn't they come out swinging...if they know these are fake?


35 posted on 09/10/2004 7:16:11 PM PDT by croixjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Geeeez, if this weren't so pathetic, it would be funny. Didn't they think this thing through?


36 posted on 09/10/2004 7:16:14 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ

The logic of the left--matchless.


37 posted on 09/10/2004 7:16:21 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

New tagline...


38 posted on 09/10/2004 7:17:00 PM PDT by Dog (Proud member of the Vast Right Wing Pajama Brigade......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

The part I like alot is the Post Office Box number. How many groups/people would have a 5 digit p o box number that has 5 sequential numbers? 3-4-5-6-7. That caught my eye.

Another poster said that the entire letterhead was a fake. He said they didn't put P O boxes on letterheads. They used the actual street address in the military in all his years in uniform.

This is looking more and more like it was done by someone way too young to have had the small details Freepers are hammering. After 2 generations have treated us older folkes like we are not relevant, it sure is good to see us old farts show them up for the fraud.


39 posted on 09/10/2004 7:17:30 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Shermy, the "list" on Rather's show was almost word for word the list in

THIS article.

40 posted on 09/10/2004 7:17:33 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson