Posted on 09/10/2004 10:51:26 AM PDT by vmivol00
Edwards wants Bush to address Guard memos
By KEVIN LANDRIGAN, Telegraph Staff landrigank@telegraph-nh.com
Published: Friday, Sep. 10, 2004
NASHUA - President Bush should have to explain newly released records that reveal his former Texas National Guard superior was asked to sugar coat performance records after finding Bush failed standards to be a trained pilot, Sen. John Edwards said Thursday.
I think they are reasonable and legitimate questions the White House ought to answer, Edwards said during an interview with The Telegraph.
CBS News released 1972 and 1973 memos Wednesday from Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who had commanded the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron where Bush served.
In one, Killian wrote that higher-ups wanted him to sugar coat Bushs record after he got suspended from flying for failing performance standards and missing a required physical.
Killian died in 1984.
(Excerpt) Read more at nashuatelegraph.com ...
I know Edwards is probably busy on the campaign trail, and may not have had time to look at ANY of the news sources which are reporting these documents as fakes, but don't you think one of his advisors should have mentioned it to him.
Do think Carville and the Clintonistas advised Edwards to make this statement to Bush?
"Bush just said he'd like EDWARDS to explain the memos"
Is that true? If so - AWSOME!! I'm SO looking forward to the day after the election, when Kerry marches back to his mansion in shame. And all the angry/hateful "peaceful" people (you know, the ones beating up the cop in NY at the convention) start chewing their livers in outrage. Oh my, that's going to be great. I'm chuckling a little right now just thinking about it.
pssst psst....John....here's the updated talking points.
Sorry we were a little tardy in getting to them.
Oh........here's a towel. You have what looks like egg all over your face and crow feathers on your lips.
John Edwards, Esq. could clear this up right now by channeling LTC Killian.
Enquiring minds want to know!
Also looks a little suspicious that the Kerry campaign had a whole strategy built around the airing of that 60 minutes story, eh?
BWWWAAAHHHH HHHAAAA HAAAAA!
Sorry, that was just soooo funny.
Once again, no platform, no plan, ZERO.
Seems like a successful lawyer like Edwards should know that it is up to the accuser to prove their case, not the other way around.
Dan Rather should have to explain the memos, and the source.
I'd like Edwards to comment on whether or not it is true that the closest he got to wearing a uniform for this country was getting kicked out of the girl scouts.
So that is what the F stands for in JFK!
Good for him. The deeper they pull the campaign into the issue, the worse the backlash if they can't prove they're legit.
Like it or not, the burden of proof seems to have shifted to CBS and the Kerry campaign. Other than bluster and bravado, I'm bettin' they don't have anything else to back them.
I agree with you about the dems strategy. I think they had this information before their convention and that is why Kerry thought he could center it on his Vietnam career. To me, that is the only thing that makes sense on why he would do such a stupid thing as that.
Maybe the "Ambulance Chaser" could tell us who forged the documents...hmmmmmmm
This is from the Onion, right? Surely this can't be fore real. Edwards want Bush to explain what's in the phoney memos? ROFL!!
Bump!
The Loch Ness monster is a good guy, dont worry, your safe..................
Has Sissy-Boy Edwards ever been in any branch of the Armed Forces?
One other note to Sissy-Boy: People in Hell want ice-water, but they don't often get it!
Why?
Terry McAuliff has as much as admitted that they are phony.
Edwards better watch out! It's dangerous for a democrat to step out of line with the Clintonistas!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.