Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity - Question - 60 Minutes Documents

Posted on 09/10/2004 8:44:45 AM PDT by truthseeker2

This may have been asked and answered. If so, I apologize for missing it.

One of the questionable documents has a typed letterhead with a PO Box '34567'. Was that a legitimate post office box back then? If so, was it the correct address for that branch of the National Guard?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: killian

1 posted on 09/10/2004 8:44:45 AM PDT by truthseeker2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthseeker2

not 'questionable documents', 'forged documents'.


2 posted on 09/10/2004 8:46:38 AM PDT by ChadsDad (If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthseeker2

Read this thread. Everything you want to know is here:


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210702/posts


3 posted on 09/10/2004 8:47:28 AM PDT by annyokie (Now with 20% More Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthseeker2

Yes, that's apparently a legitimate address.

Bush used it in other latters and forms that we know are accurate.

However, the other "address" that is "blacked out" in the other document IS false: Bush had moved from that street in 1968, several years BEFORE the "memo" was supposedly written in 1972.

Of course, since the memo was actually "typed" this summer, that can be said to be true under all circumstances


4 posted on 09/10/2004 8:47:37 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad

"not 'questionable documents', 'forged documents'."

You're right. I have to stop being so PC.


5 posted on 09/10/2004 8:48:39 AM PDT by truthseeker2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthseeker2

I read somewhere (and I'll try to find the source and report back) that that is currently the correct address for the 111th, but that before the ZIP+4 code came into being, PO Box numbers were only three digits long.


6 posted on 09/10/2004 8:49:05 AM PDT by ScottFromSpokane (Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

In 1972 I worked in the building directly in front of the TANG Headquarters building (Air Force Reserves).

We used standardized letterhead and never used P.O. box addresses. Our address was simply the group headquarters name, and Ellington AFB, Tx. I suspect thier's was something similar.


7 posted on 09/10/2004 8:51:07 AM PDT by jhouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

That would only allow for 999 possible box numbers. The number is unusual but legit. It appears on at least one of the REAL documents from Bush's records.


8 posted on 09/10/2004 8:52:26 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

I thought it merely rested on the size of the post office of the box in question. If it is a BIG post office, more boxes and higher numbers. I reserve the right to be wrong on this.


9 posted on 09/10/2004 8:53:05 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthseeker2

snip
19 - Box 34567 is suspicious, at best. The current use of the po box 34567 is Ashland Chemical Company, A Division of Ashland Oil, Incorporated P. O. Box 34567 Houston
snip

NO MEMOS FOR OIL!!!!


10 posted on 09/10/2004 8:55:55 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Zealous Troll Hunter - and you know who you are - you've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Actually, three-digit PO Box numbers would allow for 1000 PO boxes in each zip code, which seems like it would be plenty to me, but if the number appears in a genuine document, then I guess what I read was wrong, and I'll stop looking for the source.


11 posted on 09/10/2004 8:59:26 AM PDT by ScottFromSpokane (Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truthseeker2

These forgeries regarding the docs are so obvious, as I've worked for the DOD. There are SOP's regardin the spacing, letterhead etc., and these documents are truly forged.


12 posted on 09/10/2004 9:47:52 AM PDT by Inge C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson