Posted on 09/09/2004 11:02:49 PM PDT by watsonfellow
The shrew who answers their phones started yelling at me and hung up. Let's freep her.
She said, "Bush got what he deserved!"
Oh brother. So it's all President Bush's fault either way.(rolling eyes)
We need to call their sponsors...that will make more impact.
Your not deceiving them, they read this I'll guarantee you.
Key advertisers include:
United Airlines (UAL Corp.)
Glenn F. Tilton, president and chief executive officer
c/o Customer Relations, WHQPW
P.O. Box 66100, Chicago, IL 60666
United.com
American Express
Kenneth Chenault, Chairman and CEO
c/o Consumer Relations, AESC-FTL
777 American Express Way
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33337
AmericanExpress.com
Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch, Inc.)
One Busch Place
St. Louis, MO 63118
Anheuser-Busch.com
The Brita Products Co.
P.O. Box 24305
Oakland, CA 94623-9981
Brita.com
Great job. If enough people make their voices heard to these sponsers, the impact will be enormous!
Oh and Clairol and Chevrolet
More phome numbers:
CBS News
524 West 57th Street
NY, 10019-2902
Phone: (212) 975-4114, or
(212) 975-3691 for Dan Rather's office
Fax: (212) 975-1893
"Man, don't call them whores. Then you just end up sounding like the babling looonies from the DU."
I call it like I see it, and like they (CBS) are. If the word "whore" which is a commonly used word offends you, so be it, but I think I made my point to them succinctly. CBS is scum, you know.
The poor woman probably hasn't had a potty break since 9 o'clock this morning. Of course she's cranky!
pinging! (FYI)
Unfortunately, I already DON'T use the products of these sponsors.
However, the way to hurt the media is to reduce subscribers and sponsors. So, don't subscribe, don't buy the sponsors products, and be sure to tell everyone you can why you don't.
The recent scandal regarding newspaper circulation fraud is a direct result of declining readership. The reduction in subscribers costs the newspapers circulation revenue. The drop in circulation would also cost them advertising revenue if they were honest about the declines. Thus, the circulation fraud.
LOL @ that cartoon
classic HAHAHAHAHA
LOL - Can you make that a "jack-@ss"?
Yeah, Bankrobbers who find themselves surround as they leave the bank have the same short temper.
If this is a forgery, I'm sure it's another in a long line of Karl Rove's stunts. But it's not a forgery. Come on, CBS vetted it with experts, of which there must be many. On the other hand, the detractors are all right-wing bloggers. (Who you know will attack anything that knocks bush.)
My only question Is how thoroughly did CBS review these documents? How many experts did they show these documents to before going on with the story? What were their background and area of expertise?
CBS is a creditable news source. They didn't get that way by being stupid. These docs were probably gone over with a fine tooth comb until they were sure it didn't have any nits.
what document? it doesn't matter. the guy's a deserter who kills for fun he is doomed to failure I don't care if they say it was hand-typed by Rove and given to Rather by Andrew Card dressed as Huggy Bear.
So Rove gave them to CBS? Is CBS that gullible?
There are real docs that the Whitehouse had and they created forgery forms of these docs and passed them off to discredit the real ones if they ever surfaced. It mucks it up enough that if real versions surfaced, noone would ever believe it - the "forgery" meme is planted.
I agree - its a fraud Walt has showed two other era documents "as proof" that have the superscripted "th" and none of them even closely resemble the document 60 mins had - they fell for it hook line and sinker. They look completely different in the way it was done. If I knew how to PSP them side by side I would but I am looking at them now and this 60 mins thing was a fraud and Rove is ROFL at them.
Oh, please. Like a bunch of amateurs on the Internet would be able to figure out something that CBS News stuck its neck out over and never thought to investigate. Riiight.
Yikes. I started out thinking this was a Rove plant, after reading http://www.warblogging.com / - then I was convinced it wasn't. I've been crazy all day about this thing. Now I'm back where I started. I need to be sedated.
What's with all you paranoid people? Get a grip!!! This is exactly what goo defence attorneys do...CREATE DOUBT!!!! There's absolutely no reason to think these doxs are forgeries! NONE!!!
Document is forgery -- this can become the basis of an allegation that the whitehouse continues to deceive the public by lying to us, sometimes in very clever ways.
CBS has to have something to substantiate the authenticity of the memos. If it doesn't, it has cost itself any credibility it had. Obviously, this wouldn't be good for a it's news division. CBS' story had to be thoroughly vetted!
Oh good GOD! Stop and think for a moment...IF it were discovered that they were a forgery then the media would HOT after the story of who did it and why. The blowback from that would be bigger than the actual story.
What crap. The issue is are they believable? Hell yes. And what the f*ck does a wife or son for that matter really know about husband/dad. Well sh*t, let's ask Hillary. What's really Rovian is to suggest the documents are fake. Chimp has been an underachiever his whole goddamn life, much to our pain, so why would they NOT be authentic?
Radar O'Kerry! LOL!
Desperation.
Great logo, BTW.
We should send bags of ice to CBS for their lying owies!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.