Skip to comments.
Pakistan strikes kill dozens near border-witness
Reuters ^
| 09 Sep 2004
Posted on 09/09/2004 1:16:14 AM PDT by Reader of news
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Nepalis
I hope they do find him dead, somewhere,(recognizable) no need to let him spend years, and us spend $$$$$MILLIONS$$$$ to watch him stand a trial
21
posted on
09/09/2004 5:37:42 AM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: sure_fine
I hope they do find him dead, somewhere,(recognizable) no need to let him spend years, and us spend $$$$$MILLIONS$$$$ to watch him stand a trial.They won't. IMHO, He's been dead for almost 3 years. He's way beyond decomposing now.
22
posted on
09/09/2004 6:10:05 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
To: Dubya's fan
Yea with friends like this who needs...France.
23
posted on
09/09/2004 6:23:17 AM PDT
by
edchambers
(Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?)
To: Dog
What do we make of this? Lots of bad guys are dead. That's a good thing.
Sorry if my response was too complicated. :-p
24
posted on
09/09/2004 6:44:17 AM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: Dubya's fan
He said they were not in any way connected to suspected Chechen and Arab militants who took hundreds hostage at a school in southern Russia earlier this month. At least 330 people -- many of them children -- died in the end to that siege.I bet that was the first question asked by some egghead reporter.
To: risk
That missile from, "somewhere place" sounds Russianally supicious?
26
posted on
09/09/2004 7:49:22 AM PDT
by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: Ursus arctos horribilis
< islamic > It came from Allah! He is angry with his Followers for not sacrificing enough Infidel children to him!!! < /islamic >
27
posted on
09/09/2004 11:42:27 AM PDT
by
fire_eye
(Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
To: Peach; Cronos; swarthyguy
Fellas...you have to read the comment posted by "Peach." I don't know if I should laugh or cry. The sheeple are at it again....
28
posted on
09/09/2004 8:52:52 PM PDT
by
USMMA_83
(Do onto Muslims as they would most certainly do onto you)
To: Peach; swarthyguy; USMMA_83; CarrotAndStick; sukhoi-30mki
And, as I said, if we'd gone after Pakistan instead they would be first in line complaining that we didn't go after Iraq.
hmmm... let's compare -- Iraq: run by a secular dictator who came to power in a coup (overthrowing another Baathist), Pakistan: run by a slamofascist dictator who came to power overthrowing a legitimately elected government.
Irq: Saddam re-elected with 98% of the votes, Pakistan: Mushie reelected with 98% of the votes.
Irq: Christians could live with the same level of fear as the rest of the Iraqis -- no discimination, Pakistan: Shariah land, Christian, Hindus etc. are routinely tried and executed for treason, churchs are burnt etc.
Oh: Irq: no shariah, Pakistan: Shariah
Then, Iraq: trying to get WMD, close to getting it. Pakistan: already have WMD -- are the owners of the so-called "Isslamic bombb" (actually Chinese made) and have extensive biological and chemical weapons.
IRaq: not a nuclear proliferator (a likely recipient, but not a proliferator), Pakistan: sold nukes to North Korea in exchange for missiles, nearly sold nukes to IRq, Iran, Libya etc.
Iraq: terrorist training camp, though mostly restricted to the middle east. Pakistan: terrorist training camp, trainign grounds for alQaeda, sponsors of the Taliban and hosts to OBL (probably still are).
We should invade Pakistan and NOW. The Pakis are the enemy. The money and weapons we send them will be used against us
29
posted on
09/09/2004 10:30:42 PM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Dubya's fan
Pakistan is an ally in the war on terror. They've captured quite a few Al Qaeda leaders since the start of the war.
Pakistan is playing us for a sucker. They are the ones who create the Taliban and were instrumental in the funding and foundign of AlQaeda. THey trained both the groups (the paki ISI probabaly still does). They also gave nukes to North Korea and nearly gave 'em to Irqaq, Iran and Libya.
They haven't actually captured any AlQ "Leaders", just minnows tossed to us to keep us deluded. Ever notice that they are always ont he verge of capturing some alq "leader" just when the US is deliberating whether we need to send them more money or weapons? After we have done that, they either "lose" the "leader" or capture some minnow.
They are playing us for suckers and fools and we are the fools
30
posted on
09/09/2004 10:34:11 PM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Cronos
I couldn't disagree with you more.
Even the Senate Intelligence Committee report contains over 60 pages of direct connections between Iraq and Islamic terrorists and specifically Al Qaeda.
The Report details 78 different reports from different sources that Hussein's regime was actively training Iraqi intelligence soldiers for terrorist attacks against America.
The Report details that Iraq provided Al Qaeda with training, bomb making, chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear training.
The Report mentions direct meetings between senior Iraqi military officera nd top Al Qaeda operatives took place between the early 90's and 2003.
On July 21, 2001, the Iraqi newspaper Al Nasiriya talked about how OBL was gonig to "bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House" and that OBL will "strike America on the arm that is already huring" (first WTC attack) and we will "curse the memory of Sinatra every time he hears his song" (a reference to NY, NY).
Tell Freepers that you HONESTLY believe if Saddam would be doing all the work that Pakistan is doing rolling up AQ and terrorists. Come on. Just be honest about it for a second. It's inconceivable, isn't it. Thought so.
31
posted on
09/10/2004 4:25:58 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
Even the Senate Intelligence Committee report contains over 60 pages of direct connections between Iraq and Islamic terrorists and specifically Al Qaeda.
I'm not talking about the links between Irq and alQ -- they PALE in comparison to the links, funding etc. done by the Pakis. Pakistan created the Taliban and was instrumental in creating and funding alQ. The Paki army still trains terrorists
32
posted on
09/10/2004 7:17:39 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Peach
Tell Freepers that you HONESTLY believe if Saddam would be doing all the work that Pakistan is doing rolling up AQ and terrorists. Come on. Just be honest about it for a second. It's inconceivable, isn't it.
THe Pakis are NOT doing any real work to stop alQ-- it's just wool beinig pulled over our eyes -- they're still deeply involved int he training of terrorists and the funding of Alq
33
posted on
09/10/2004 7:18:45 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Cronos
Riiiiight.
Thankfully those in power disagree with you. I'll take our military intelligence over yours on this matter any day.
And I gather from your non-answer that you do actually believe that Saddam would be helping us roll up AQ. Hah! I have a bridge you may wish to buy as well.
34
posted on
09/10/2004 7:23:39 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Nepalis
I hope that including Osama ."
My vote is that he is already dead and if not, would never at this point attend such a large meeting.
I greatly respect General Musharref. He had giant balls to stand up and do the right thing for his people. His own intelligence directly aids Al Queda but he controls the army. People wonder why we gave Pakistan billions in aid why they didn't move sooner. It takes time to replace corrupt intelligence officials with integrity to get the kind of intel to make a effective attack possible.
35
posted on
09/10/2004 2:28:59 PM PDT
by
quant5
To: Peach
hankfully those in power disagree with you.
actually thePresident agrees with me -- it's just the old foggies who have their heads still stuck in the Cold War that are supporting the Islamic state of Pakistan.
And I gather from your non-answer that you do actually believe that Saddam would be helping us roll up AQ.
And you base your "proof" on a non-answer. Just what I'd expect from somewhat fooled by Pakistani "efforts to catch AlQaeda"
36
posted on
09/11/2004 3:36:13 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: quant5; sukhoi-30mki
I greatly respect General Musharref. He had giant balls to stand up and do the right thing for his people.His giant b**** were squeezed by our govt to make sure he allowed us to use Paki airspace for the Afghan war -- and he was psuhed by the fact that India was the first to offer use of their airspace for the war, so the Pakis knew that if they didn't co-operate, their own slamofascist state would be pulled down.
37
posted on
09/11/2004 3:38:57 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Cronos
I'd respond to your post but it's such blatant nonsense that even newbies visiting the forum won't fall for it.
38
posted on
09/11/2004 3:41:10 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Dubya's fan
In reading "American Soldier" General Tommy Franks book, he writes about Musharraf.
He said they talked not as A General and a President but soldier to soldier.
Musharraf did not like the Taliban but needed Afghanistan militarily. He needed space to fight India. And he also said his nukes were and always will be defensive.
Franks says man to man he believes Musahrraf. The man does not like Islamic or Hindu terrorists.
39
posted on
09/11/2004 3:46:37 AM PDT
by
Michael121
(An old soldier knows truth. Only a Dead Soldier knows peace.)
To: Michael121
Pervez Musharraf is a friend of the USA.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson