Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE "New" CBS BUSH DOCUMENTS: Let's do some investigating
www.freerepublic.com | September 9, 2004

Posted on 09/08/2004 9:16:02 PM PDT by Howlin

These are the NEW documents "discovered" by CBS with conjunction with their Ben Barnes expose/confessional tonight regarding George Bush's National Guard service.

They've gotten some interesting comments on the Live Thread, so I thought I'd give them their own thread so you people out there with the knowledge can dissect them for their accuracy/truth/existence.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: District of Columbia; US: Georgia; US: Texas; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; alabama; barnes; bush; cbs; danrather; dubya; edwards; election; gwb; kerry; killian; ltbush; memogate; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 641-656 next last
To: fat city

Yeah, but I can guarandamntee you that a Lt.Col in the Texas National Guard didn't have access to anything but a government issue standard typewriter.


461 posted on 09/09/2004 10:39:21 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I haven't seen it mentioned, but when I was in the service, the format for any date was ALWAYS "month, day, year", period. I've had several people remark that I must have been in the military because I still use the "month, day, year" date format.


462 posted on 09/09/2004 10:44:42 AM PDT by ScreamingFist (Peace through Ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969

That is a good point and needs to be carefully addressed.


463 posted on 09/09/2004 10:48:28 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I'm not talking about the Selectric. I'm talking about the Executive. And a Freeper on this forum has relevant experience with this typewriter in this time period.


464 posted on 09/09/2004 10:50:33 AM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

i dont know much about fonts etc but the people who called that the line,

"not happy today either"

as a drop in are correct, just blow up the pdf and compare the letters to those in the paragraph above, they are all different

also

look at the date on the top and compare it with the 187th below

same number but they look different,

the relationship between the 1 and 8 are different, the 8 flys above the 1 on the date and is exactely lined up with the 1 on the 187th.

also the 7 on the date is different than the 7 on the 187th

forgery, no doubt,

woooo eeey someone is going to have a red hinney.


465 posted on 09/09/2004 10:53:55 AM PDT by icemaniceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: icemaniceman

not happy today either

referred to above is on the 18 August memo


466 posted on 09/09/2004 10:55:33 AM PDT by icemaniceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

I increased the brightness on the redacted section in the May 4th PDF: http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf Forgery... there is no way redacted material in any military document would ever be visible. Ever.
467 posted on 09/09/2004 10:56:52 AM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process

I know the typewriter my parents had had special character keys for things like 1/2. It seems to me it had a "th" key too - but I don't remember.


468 posted on 09/09/2004 11:00:00 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

Can anyone find any redacted material in ANY official military/government records that is legible? I sure can't.


469 posted on 09/09/2004 11:05:34 AM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Is there any reason to believe that Bush was on duty between May 4 and May 14th, 1972? Perpetual Calendar for 1972
470 posted on 09/09/2004 11:06:53 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969; Howlin

This is at NRO's The Corner:


Jonah:

Interesting theory, but...

When I was stationed at Patrick AFB (1971-74), I distinctly recall our office (Office of Public Information) had a correcting IBM proportional typewriter along with our standard-issue Selectrics. Nobody wanted to use the damn thing. It was a pain in the butt to use because to backspace you had to use a table that prescribed the number of "ens" for each letter for both upper and lower case. I believe (but I'm not sure) that the typeface was some form of Times-Roman rather than Courrier.

Before my recollections are questioned, I want to assure you that the AF Good Conduct Medal listed on my DD214 is entirely legitimate.

---

Given the existence of the Executive, and the Composer, I think that perhaps it is not quite a lead pipe cinch based on proportional font alone, though it remains exceedingly unlikely.

If somebody could attempt to reproduce this in an IBM Executive, that would shed some light on this. It has been almost perfectly duplicated using MS Word on a PC.

Despite the existence of the IBM Executive and Composer, the other circumstantial indicators this is a forgery are still glowing white hot, and all of them together make it rather compelling.


471 posted on 09/09/2004 11:11:15 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I've only been here a year and a half.
I would only recognize names from that time period.
We need an Elder Freepsman to do the honors.


472 posted on 09/09/2004 11:21:48 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Zealous Troll Hunter - and you know who you are - you've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Don't know if you've seen this yet, but it now seems that the White House DID release two of these memos, but, hold on now, they got them from CBS a couple of days before the story came out, so it doesn't really constitute a vindication of the documents' authenticity. They still originate only from CBS' source.


473 posted on 09/09/2004 11:24:44 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

ping


474 posted on 09/09/2004 11:25:19 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969

Could not make the "th" smaller than the metal keys.
This is clearly smaller than the th keys.


475 posted on 09/09/2004 11:25:50 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Zealous Troll Hunter - and you know who you are - you've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Buckhead

The reserves and Guard generally use older office equipment than that used by the regulars.


476 posted on 09/09/2004 11:27:20 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; All

There is too much information on these threads to keep up with, but there appears to be some inconsistencies that point to forgery.

Has anyone come up with a reason why they would have created forgeries that don't say anything bad against Bush? Maybe these are a dry run for the October stash, yet to be released?


477 posted on 09/09/2004 11:29:35 AM PDT by RobFromGa (A desperate man is a dangerous man, and Kerry is getting desperate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Actually, Grounded Supports the argument that Bush was not due to have his flight exam until July. It notes that he was suspended from flight status in August.
478 posted on 09/09/2004 11:29:52 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: oolatec
I frequently produce redacted documents in my line of work. You have to go over the redaction with a marker and then xerox the page so that it will be opaque on the copy. Otherwise, the redaction will be visible on the original by doing what you just did.

Whoever did this was an amateur.

479 posted on 09/09/2004 11:31:18 AM PDT by colorado tanker (wanna see my happy hat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: lepton

I'm not sure; what is your question?


480 posted on 09/09/2004 11:32:09 AM PDT by Howlin (I'm mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 641-656 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson