Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians: A Party Against America ("But really, what a bunch of sickos.")
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal ^ | September 8, 2004 | James Taranto 'Best of the Web'

Posted on 09/08/2004 8:53:21 PM PDT by quidnunc

This Saturday is Sept. 11, the third anniversary of, well, Sept. 11. A political organization holding a meeting that day urges its members to show up "wearing some clothing article colored black to mourn the deaths of the thousands of people who have died as a result of U.S. government policies."

That's right, this outfit thinks the anniversary of an attack on America is an appropriate day for a Blame America First-fest. Ah well, we've come to expect such things from moonbat Muslims and commie peaceniks. There's no point in getting upset.

Only this group of ideological extremists consists neither of Islamists nor commies. It's the Libertarian Party and its "presidential candidate," Michael Badnarik. They are, of course, perfectly entitled to exercise their right to freedom of speech. But really, what a bunch of sickos.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; badnarik; constitution; constitutionally; jamestaranto; libertarianparty; libertarians; loosertarians; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: quidnunc
I don't have time to check the archives, but it wasn't more than half a week after 9/11 when Harry Browne wrote a piece for WorldNetDaily called "When Will We Learn?" and advanced the ignorant position that the USA 'forced' Japan into bombing Pearl Harbor.

I worked at the time at an international corporation that was ground to a halt due to so many people being stranded due to the grounding of air travel, and remember spending that entire day on FR, angry as a cobra at the "libertarian" idiots who didn't learn the history about 1) how quasi-demigod Hirohito wanted to make the Pacific Ocean his own domain (including Australia!) and 2) how Switzerland remained "neutral" by being the center of laundered Nazi loot and was non-affiliated by agreement with the Axis powers.

81 posted on 09/09/2004 12:36:34 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Hey, KERRY! We said it to Saddam, and now to you -- If you have nothing to hide, QUIT HIDING IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

If you think about it, you may change your position.

There is little anyone in the private sector could do to impose martial law, even if the military were privatized (an admitted stretch of reality). The government, however, already controls all the ancillaries that would make it possible: the government can already control where people go and when (witness hurricane evacuations, etc.), what arms (if any) they can posess, with whom they can associate (Anti-Terrorism Act, Patriot Act, RICO), and what they can broadcast. The government also controls the schools, just to make it stick; and, if that weren't enough, the government also has a heavy hand of control on local police. No one in the private sector could control all this.

Add to that: those in the private sector are disincentivized from using such a power, even if it could get it. Martial law destroys capitalism. Those in the ruling class, however, have made their careers controlling others. They live for the power, and martial law would be their greatest fantasy come true.

Think it through, and let me know if you change your mind.


82 posted on 09/09/2004 6:04:36 AM PDT by Con_Liberal ("...error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
"Well, there is nothing wrong with being a libertarian. There is, however, something very wrong with being a member of the "Libertarian" Party."

Exactly....My hopes for the Libertarian party are that they cease wasting time and effort in fielding national candidates, instead fund local races. I'd like to see them behave like the "conservative" party in some states, where they simply endorse someone from the major parties for president.

83 posted on 09/09/2004 6:22:13 AM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

Is this something you support?


84 posted on 09/09/2004 6:23:00 AM PDT by wasp69 (Zell Miller is a prime example that Southern Gentlemen and Statesmen still exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

I think a lot of us are uncapitalized libertarians. The party is kooky. The general philosophy is not.


85 posted on 09/09/2004 6:26:26 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Peter Schwartz wrote an essay called "Libertarianism: The Perversion of Liberty." In this essay he explains that Objectivism is anti-Statist while Libertarianism is anti-State.

The practical difference being that Objectivists reject initiation of force by the State while Libertarians reject any force by the State, even retaliatory.

Of course without allowing retaliatory force, the Libertarians' State would soon fall to any group powerful enough to take it. Today, that would undoubtedly be the militant Islamists.

Objectivists would not negate our right to defend ourselves in the wake of 9-11. I suspect that many people who call themselves libertarians but find fault with those who control the LP are more likely Objectivists.


86 posted on 09/09/2004 6:31:04 AM PDT by flada (I do not fall down. That SOB pushed me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
What really sucks is that I've met Michael a couple of times. He's a very ernest kind of guy. Too bad the LP got hijacked by anti-war, "no force ever" types.

As Boortz put it, when the wind is blowing your way and your neighbors house is on fire? Put said fire out first and worry about making restitution for wrongful actions later.

87 posted on 09/09/2004 6:37:18 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Libertarians (of which I fancied myself once) are "ruled" by whack jobs more interested in the ready availability of heroin and syringes than in basic issues of security and decency.


88 posted on 09/09/2004 6:50:31 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

It's the same battlecry: "Asia for the Asiatics!" and "Let's leave the Middle East alone to destroy themselves and others!"


89 posted on 09/09/2004 6:55:09 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
. . . apart from their cruel moral-liberalism, moral-cowardice, ideologically-addled mindset, and their doomed-to-failure humanist schemes.

Do you consider Jim Robinson to be a moral-liberal since he claims to see eye to eye with libertarians on most issues?

90 posted on 09/09/2004 7:04:15 AM PDT by jmc813 (CAN YOU MAKE THE SAME CLAIM;ARE YOU A VIRGIN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
Well, they both are, as much as the philosophy can even be nailed down. Self-avowed adherents have claimed it is more than a philosophy; it is a way of life. Hence there are those who seriously waste their lives trying to devise ways of extricating themselves from our self-governing institutions, much as political Luddites sitting in unpowered Montana cabins.
91 posted on 09/09/2004 7:07:30 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
(snicker)

Nice smear post...

If you go to the source of your source of your source link (Here) , all that is really going on is that people are invited to gather to mourn the people who died on 9/11. The only "controversial" statement includes something we already know: "Gordon states that primary consequences of 9/11 are the War in Iraq and the Patriot Act, policies which Bush and Kerry support but Badnarik adamantly opposes." And you could make an intellectual argument that Islamic Nazism, coupled with our foreign policy of interventionism around the world, did in fact create the environment for 9/11 to happen. Let call a spade a spade. These people are not celebrating the death and destruction that resulted from 9/11.

92 posted on 09/09/2004 7:15:05 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flada; Cultural Jihad
Peter Schwartz wrote an essay called "Libertarianism: The Perversion of Liberty." In this essay he explains that Objectivism is anti-Statist while Libertarianism is anti-State.

The rational libertarian supports our Constitution, which is an anti-statist, pro-individual liberty document, -- one that establishes a government to provide for the common defense.

The practical difference being that Objectivists reject initiation of force by the State while Libertarians reject any force by the State, even retaliatory.

Label them as you like, but the members of the Libertarian Party who reject self defense are not following libertarian principle.

Of course without allowing retaliatory force, the Libertarians' State would soon fall to any group powerful enough to take it. Today, that would undoubtedly be the militant Islamists.
Objectivists would not negate our right to defend ourselves in the wake of 9-11. I suspect that many people who call themselves libertarians but find fault with those who control the LP are more likely Objectivists.

Do your 'Objectivists' support the principles of our Constitution, flada?

And CJ, -- do you cultural jihadics support the principles of our Constitution?

93 posted on 09/09/2004 7:44:10 AM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

My Libertarian friends are voting for Bush.

Also it helps to remember that a group of four Libertarians when queried about a single subject will generate at least 16 opinions.


94 posted on 09/09/2004 7:46:09 AM PDT by Little Ray (John Ffing sKerry: Just a gigolo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Do your 'Objectivists' support the principles of our Constitution, flada?

For the most part, I believe they do. With possible exceptions of post offices and such. As well as most of the Amendments that follow the BOR, which seem primarily to weaken the BOR.

Personally, I'm not exactly an "Objectivist" and usually prefer to call myself libertarian. The post to which you responded was not intended as my position, but as a probably valid "third" viewpoint explaining some of the problems with the LP.

I think it can easily be argued that those currently in control of the LP and its platform give credence to this argument.

95 posted on 09/09/2004 8:05:41 AM PDT by flada (I do not fall down. That SOB pushed me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: flada
Do your 'Objectivists' support the principles of our Constitution, flada?

For the most part, I believe they do. With possible exceptions of post offices and such. As well as most of the Amendments that follow the BOR, which seem primarily to weaken the BOR.

Which Amendments [except for income tax] weaken the BOR's?

96 posted on 09/09/2004 8:19:30 AM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: t_skoz

The main problem with being a libertarian is the myopic DOLTS and IDIOTS running the Libertarian Party.

I say, libertarianize America; libertarianize the GOP!


97 posted on 09/09/2004 8:37:40 AM PDT by t_skoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Yeah, some of our past foreign policy has sucked, and if we followed Geo Washington's advice from his farewell address, we probably wouldn't have funded and armed our enemy's enemies.

But no matter how you slice it, one of the only problems with the War On Terror is that we don't have a Constitutional, Congressional Declaration of War, or Letter of Marquee and Reprisal to kick ass on these scumbags. They are nothing more than pirates. You cannot allow pirates to terrorize us. You must declare war on the countries that directly support terrorists, and you must use special forces to execute warrants on terrorist leaders.

Personally, my only beef with the WOT is that it's not Constitutionally "legal", and that we haven't bombed Syria and Saudia Arabia into the 3rd Century!


98 posted on 09/09/2004 8:51:27 AM PDT by t_skoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: flada
There are plenty of ideological libertarians who believe in retalatory force, in fact almost all libertarians I know (except for so-called "left-libertarians" aka anarchist-leftists) believe in CRUSHINGLY STRONG retalatory force. It's the INITIATION of force that the libertarians oppose.

As I said in an earlier post, my only problem with the WOT is that we don't have the necessary Constitutional details such as Declarations of War and Letters of Marquee, and that we haven't bombed Syria and Saudia Arabia into the 3rd Century.

Saudi Arabia if I was in charge:

How's that for retalatory force?

99 posted on 09/09/2004 9:02:58 AM PDT by t_skoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

Taking the concept to the extreme is ridiculous. But the general concept of "that government is best that governs least" is a reasonable one. You just can't be a kook about it.


100 posted on 09/09/2004 9:15:07 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson