Spread the word. The NYT has really stepped in it.
1 posted on
09/07/2004 6:17:27 PM PDT by
chiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: chiller
No kidding, because my accepted translation of Allah is Satan, the blood-sucking moon god.
2 posted on
09/07/2004 6:19:23 PM PDT by
evolved_rage
(Kerry, the unmitigated Gaul.)
To: chiller
Apparently Arab-speaking Jews and Christians refer to our God as "Allah." It's just Arabic for "God." I suppose that the Times did a proper translation. They probably should have detailed the al-Qaida connection.
3 posted on
09/07/2004 6:22:19 PM PDT by
dufekin
(President Kerry would have our enemies partying like it's 1969. That's when he became a traitor.)
To: chiller
What is wrong with the NYT? The city that got blasted with terrorism, and its largest newspaper refuses to note the most important consistency between 9/11 and this? No wonder there are so many liberals in NY - they're being brainwashed by this flippin' leftist rag.
4 posted on
09/07/2004 6:22:25 PM PDT by
meyer
To: chiller
The New York Times Fingers Judao-Christians in Beslan Deaths
Judaoism? Is it Chinese?
5 posted on
09/07/2004 6:22:54 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: chiller
Did you think the NYTs was on our side?
6 posted on
09/07/2004 6:24:12 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Let's hear about your Senate record already, John!)
To: chiller
Well...the AP invented whole facts in its "boo" coverage of Bush's campaign.
To: chiller
Tonight while channel surfing, I heard someone on CNN ask a guest if the media is in collusion with the terrorists because they refuse to call them "terrorists." The guest said it is because the news outlets are AFRAID to call them terrorists for fear of retaliation. Now that's a new twist. I couldn't believe what I was hearing!
To: chiller
The NYT has always been full of manure. If you have ever seen copies of the NYT in the early 1930's referring to Germany rearming as; "it being their right", then turn around and call Adolph every name in the book, except socialist, after Germany invades Russia in '42, than you'd know the "Fix Was In" at the NYT a long, long time ago.
10 posted on
09/07/2004 6:26:12 PM PDT by
elbucko
(A Feral Republican)
To: chiller
13 posted on
09/07/2004 6:29:06 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: chiller
The New Left Times has totally lost it to blind, self-absorbed, liberalism and anti-Americanism. After all, look at their reader-base.
It is disgusting to think about our troops and our military in general, that continues to protect this country with their lives, given daily, to protect these ANTI-AMERICAN SCUM that daily, with their presses, attempt to tear down the very fabric of America.
If I could, I would shut down the NYT, until they could provide some justification as to WHY OUR TROOPS SHOULD DIE TO PROTECT THIER FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS!!!!
14 posted on
09/07/2004 6:29:38 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: chiller
I have the same reaction that Rush once mentioned about NYT stories. "Gee, I wonder if that's true?"
What a sad commentary about the so-called newspaper of record.
15 posted on
09/07/2004 6:30:18 PM PDT by
chiller
(Kill lying liberal Old media.....turn 'em off !)
To: chiller
NYT is a piece rag. I rather read Pravda then this piece of tripe.
16 posted on
09/07/2004 6:31:22 PM PDT by
Ptarmigan
(Proud rabbit hater and killer)
To: chiller
The New York Times: "All the news that's fit to censor."
17 posted on
09/07/2004 6:33:15 PM PDT by
Allan
To: chiller
To the NYTimes and the Boston Globe, the Islamic terrorists
are "Holy Warriors".
21 posted on
09/07/2004 6:40:36 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
To: chiller
Why are we not surprised? Al Jazeera on the Hudson.
22 posted on
09/07/2004 6:41:53 PM PDT by
hershey
To: chiller
The New York Times is still too busy covering the Abu Ghraib story...I guess 50+ front page stories wasn't enough. Savage just ran through a number of headlines from around the country (and world)...and some outlets actually refered to them as "activists"...with none of the ever mentioning the word, terrorists.
24 posted on
09/07/2004 6:43:58 PM PDT by
cwb
(John Kerry: Still attacking Vietnam Vets after 35 years.)
To: chiller
How do you get the guts to even read the New York Slimes? I haven't for years and I'm a happier man for it!
I guess the liberals are tired of blubbering "why do they hate us?". Now they are blubbering "why do they hate the Russians?".
27 posted on
09/07/2004 6:53:00 PM PDT by
Ukiapah Heep
(Shoes for Industry!)
To: chiller
NYT is sold nationwide at Starbucks. I would like to boycott Starbucks unless / until they drop the NYT.
32 posted on
09/07/2004 7:12:25 PM PDT by
Tax Government
(Before there is faith, there must be hope.)
To: chiller
It is, indeed, an outrage. Nothing more than typical of this bullsh*t so-called newspaper.
To: chiller
"Imagine you're a person who only gets his or her news from the New York Times."Okay. I'm imagining... I only get my news from the New York Times... Yesssss...I'm a moron...a dysinformed moron...
38 posted on
09/07/2004 7:49:36 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
(9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson