Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diet Pill Was a Driving Force in French Drug Merger (Read the fourth sentence/paragraph)
NY Times ^ | September 7, 2004 | MARK LANDLER

Posted on 09/07/2004 5:59:52 PM PDT by neverdem

FRANKFURT, Sept. 6 - The year's big drug-industry merger may turn out to be about using marketing muscle to fight fat.

In April, when the French drug company Sanofi-Synthélabo vanquished all other players with a long-shot takeover bid for a much larger French-German rival, Aventis, many commentators focused on the role of politicians in Paris.

The French government, determined to create a national champion in pharmaceuticals, all but stage-managed the deal, which created the world's third-largest drug company, after Pfizer of the United States and GlaxoSmithKline of Britain.

But last week, with Sanofi's release of promising test results for a new drug that fights both obesity and smoking, it became clear that the $65 billion merger was about more than Gaullist bragging rights.

The drug, which is known as rimonabant and will be marketed as Acomplia, was in Sanofi's pipeline long before the merger, and the company - now called Sanofi-Aventis - says that it could become one of the industry's once-in-a-decade blockbusters. Many doctors and analysts agree. While doubters note that other promising obesity drugs have proved disappointing and that the company has not completed some crucial tests, Sanofi plans to file for regulatory approval early next year in the United States and Europe. If regulators sign off, the company hopes to put the drug on the market in 2006.

With obesity affecting 100 million people in the United States and Europe, analysts say such a drug could generate up to $6 billion a year in sales by the end of the decade. That would put Acomplia on the top shelf of the medicine cabinet, with the likes of Pfizer's Lipitor and Merck's Zocor cholesterol treatments.

"We Europeans, whenever we came to America, we always noticed the enormous number of obese people on the streets," said Jean-Pierre Bassand, a cardiologist who chaired the meeting of the European Society of Cardiology in Munich last week, where the results were presented.

"But now obesity is spreading all over the world, like wildfire," Dr. Bassand said. "Fifteen percent of French adolescents are obese. This is potentially a major breakthrough in treating this condition."

The data presented in Munich last week were based on interim results from a planned two-year study that is not yet complete. But the figures were striking - and in keeping with the outcome of an earlier trial in the United States. More than 1,500 patients treated daily for one year with a 20-milligram dose of Acomplia lost an average of 8.6 kilograms (19 pounds) and reduced their waistlines by an average of 8.5 centimeters (3.5 inches). The drug also increased levels in the blood of HDL cholesterol - the so-called good cholesterol - by an average of 27 percent.

Doctors taking part in the trial say they are particularly excited by the drug's shrinking effect on waistlines.

"We know that the deep abdominal weight in your belly is the dangerous fat that leads to heart disease and diabetes," said Luc van Gaal, a professor of medicine at the Antwerp University Hospital in Belgium.

What makes Acomplia even more tantalizing is a clinical trial in the United States indicating that the drug, taken in daily 20 milligram doses, can nearly double a patient's odds of stopping smoking. Moreover, those who did quit gained little weight afterward - avoiding a common aftereffect that has been a disincentive for smokers to give up cigarettes.

"It gives us another bullet in the gun," said Robert M. Anthenelli, an addiction psychiatrist at the University of Cincinnati and an investigator in the smoking trial. "It is totally unlike other medicines."

But if Acomplia's early promise eventually translates to a marketable drug, then selling it - especially in the huge American market - will demand a much larger sales force than Sanofi could have fielded before the takeover. Currently, for example, the company relies on Bristol-Myers Squibb to market two of Sanofi's best-selling drugs in the United States - the blood-thinner Plavix and the blood pressure pill Avapro. But the alliance has a steep price: Bristol-Myers reportedly pockets about half the drugs' American profits.

Through the merger with Aventis, with its large stateside sales force, Sanofi will be able to market Acomplia by itself, retaining all its sales and profits. Although the market motive was scarcely mentioned by Sanofi's executives when they announced the bid, it turns out to have been a driving force behind the takeover.

"We needed more muscle to sell such a product," Gérard Le Fur, the company's chief scientist and No. 2 executive, said in a telephone interview from Paris. "We knew the first results of the trials back in January. Knowing that, it was more or less linked to the deal."

To be sure, Dr. Le Fur said, this was not the only reason to acquire Aventis. In a rapidly consolidating industry, Sanofi needed to become bigger - a need underscored by the potential loss of its patent on Plavix, which is being challenged in North America by generic-drug makers in a legal case likely to be decided next year. And nobody is revising the judgment that Sanofi benefited from old-fashioned industrial policy on the part of the French government, which maneuvered to stop the Swiss drug maker Novartis from bidding for Aventis.

But the tremendous promise of Acomplia, especially in the United States, adds a twist to the story. France's newest champion, it appears, will stake its claim to industry leadership in no small part by helping bulging Americans to reduce their waistlines and quit smoking.

The obesity trials in Europe and the United States turned up some evidence of side effects, including nausea and diarrhea. But doctors involved in the tests said the effects were generally mild and transient.

The two main anti-obesity drugs already on the market in the United States, Meridia from Abbott Laboratories and Xenical from Roche Laboratories, have been hampered by more troublesome side effects: high blood pressure in the case of Meridia, and soiling oneself in the case of Xenical.

Obesity experts describe the medications and a third one on the market, the generic drug phentermine, as only moderately useful. People on Meridia tend to lose 10 to 14 pounds in six months, and those on Xenical, 13 pounds in a year. Phentermine is approved only for short-term use - a few weeks at a time - and most people lose less than a pound a week.

People often regain weight quickly once they stop taking the drugs. That is why some skeptics say that only longer-term studies can determine whether the preliminary results of Sanofi's Acomplia trials will translate into lasting weight loss.

Rimonabant works by blocking a certain kind of receptor, or trigger, that governs food intake and tobacco dependency. The receptors are in the brain, but also throughout the body, notably in fat cells. Among other things, they account for the sudden surge of appetite felt by people who smoke marijuana.

Doctors say that this system of receptors is disrupted by tobacco and by chronic overeating. The drug restores the balance in the system, reducing dependence on tobacco and suppressing appetite. Since many smokers are also overweight, Acomplia could end up doing double duty.

"Smoking and obesity are the No. 1 and No. 2 killers in the Western world," Dr. Anthenelli, the addiction specialist, said. "This one medication has the power to combat both conditions, and that explains the excitement."

He cautioned, though, that the smoking trial, involving 787 patients, lasted only 10 weeks. Results from a six-month trial are not yet available. For that matter, Sanofi must still analyze the second year of data from the obesity trial that was presented in Munich last week. The results will probably be presented at the meeting of the American Heart Association in November. In the meantime, some doctors are skeptical.

"I want to know what happens after the patients stop taking the drug," said Kevin Wei, a cardiologist at the University of Virginia. "Do they have a massive rebound in weight, or do they manage to keep it off? To counteract the effects of obesity, you need to keep the weight off for years or even decades."

Sanofi said it was confident that its two-year trials would show that the drug's effects were lasting.

Even if Acomplia is eventually approved for sale, other variables could determine how profitable the drug will be. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration treats existing anti-obesity medications as lifestyle drugs, which typically makes them ineligible for reimbursement under health-insurance policies. That financial consideration has helped limit their sales.

Dr. Bassand, however, said Acomplia would probably be prescribed only to patients whose weight put them at risk of cardiovascular disease or other illness. "This will not be a Thursday pill for the Sunday beach," he said, alluding to the array of over-the-counter medications for quick weight loss.

Noting that obesity was "more than an epidemic" in the United States, Dr. Le Fur of Sanofi said he was confident that the drug would be approved by the F.D.A., and that it would be reimbursed under many health insurance plans.

Sanofi will not estimate the sales potential of Acomplia at these early stages, or predict how the sales may be distributed globally. But analysts figure the drug would derive 60 percent of its sales in the United States and 40 percent in Europe.

Marc Booty, a pharmaceutical analyst at Commerzbank Securities in London, said that if Sanofi could sell Acomplia to 5 percent of the obese population in 2010, at a price equal to that of standard anticholesterol drugs - which can range from about $2 to $4 a pill - it would generate 5 billion euros, or $6 billion, a year.

To avoid giving away a chunk of those sales, however, Sanofi would have to market the drug without any partners, which could prove challenging for its existing United States sales force of 2,500. Once its merger with Aventis is complete by year's end, however, Sanofi will pick up 4,500 additional sales representatives in the United States - giving it a force similar in size to those of Merck, Novartis and AstraZeneca.

"They've been very good at developing drugs, but they haven't had the clout to market the drugs," Mr. Booty said. "This would give them a very credible voice in the United States."

Dr. Le Fur agrees that a muscular American presence is critical to the drug's future. But for reasons perhaps having to do as much with politics as with profits, he is careful not to dwell too much on overweight Americans. "We have big bottoms in Europe, too," he said.

Denise Grady contributed reporting for this article.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aventis; drugs; france; glaxosmithkline; healthcare; obesity; pfizer; pharmaceuticals; sanofisynthlabo; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2004 5:59:55 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; ...

ping


2 posted on 09/07/2004 6:01:22 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I agree that an effective obesity drug will be a blockbuster drug with ENORMOUS profit potential, especially now that it is looking more and more like insurance will start covering obesity treatments.

But, at the end of the day, I don't think Accomplia will be the drug that carries the day in this market. Sorry, Aventis.

I'm betting big on AOD9604. It's coming right behind Accomplia and it seems to be twice as effective and with none of the side effects and complications, as AOD9604 is not an appetite supressant.

Do a Google search on AOD9604 and you'll find out what I'm talking about. You might be surprised by what you learn.


3 posted on 09/07/2004 6:07:00 PM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

can ya eat that pill with ice cream?


4 posted on 09/07/2004 6:10:51 PM PDT by woofie (What Do You Call a Boomerang That Doesn't work? ...a stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Thanks for the tip.


5 posted on 09/07/2004 6:12:30 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Thank you for bringing this up.

I did the search, as you suggested; and the results are certainly informative. Judging soley upon the merits of the reports online; this looks like a door buster.


6 posted on 09/07/2004 6:14:36 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

AOD9604 Aussie developer website: http://www.metabolic.com.au


7 posted on 09/07/2004 6:20:38 PM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

It looks pretty good.


8 posted on 09/07/2004 6:31:37 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Does it trade as an ADR, or only on the Aussie exchange?

Thanks.


9 posted on 09/07/2004 6:42:07 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

Metabolic Pharmaceuticals (MBP.AX) has a fair amount of trade on the Australian exchange, and also trades on the Pink Sheets (MBLPF.PK) in the US, but the volume is miniscule. You can check either of these codes on Yahoo Finance.

Still, the stock can be bought if you have a full service broker. I have accumulated quite a few shares over the past few months myself, and I am continuing to buy more as I am able. Sometime toward the end of this year or early next year, I'd look to it trading on the NASDAQ, but I extept that there will have been a fair runup in the price by then.

A price driver will be the forecast release in November of the results of the Phase 2b trials. This will preceed any listing on the NASDAQ.

Also, assuming positive results from the Phase 2b trails, the next price driver would probably be announcement of a deal with a "big pharma" company, like Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, etc. for the North American marketing rights - if they go that route, a possibility I think very likely.


10 posted on 09/07/2004 7:22:28 PM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"In the second study (the RIO-Lipids study,) 1036 patients who were either overweight or obese and who had blood lipid disorderswere also randomized to one of three groups (placebo vs. 5 mg/day or 20 mg/day rimonabant). After 1 year of treatment, patients receiving 20 mg rimonabant lost an average of about 20 pounds of weight, compared to 5 pounds for patients on placebo.

Further, patients receiving 20 mg rimonabant had significant improvements (compared to placebo) in waist circumference, HDL levels, triglyceride levels, CRP levels, and insulin sensitivity. For patients with metabolic syndrome at baseline (which included about 50% of the study population), half of those taking 20 mg rimonabant no longer had metabolic syndromeat the end of the study. "



http://heartdisease.about.com/cs/riskfactors/a/rimonabant2.htm


11 posted on 09/07/2004 7:29:19 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Cool. Sounds like you can get high and control the munchies, too!


12 posted on 09/07/2004 7:50:13 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Thanks for the info.

Is FDA involved in trials now?


13 posted on 09/07/2004 7:56:18 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Thanks for the intersting link.


14 posted on 09/07/2004 8:03:41 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It looks like it's much more, than a diet pill.


15 posted on 09/07/2004 8:14:04 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

I don't know if I can give a full answer to that, but I do know that MBP has a steering commiteee made up of the cream of American endrocrinologists, and that all their efforts are directed at FDA approval, so I have to think that they know what they are doing. The trials underway are FDA trials, that's for sure.

I just can't say that the FDA is "involved", because I'm not sure exactly what than means. I do know that they expect the FDA to fast track the approval process, just as for the Sanofil/Aventis appetite suppressant drug, and they hope to be actively marketing in the USA by 2007.


16 posted on 09/07/2004 8:29:53 PM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
It looks like it's much more, than a diet pill.

Most of the benefits claimed, while real, such as remission of symptoms of "metabolic syndrome", i.e. normalization of certain hormonal levels, are caused directly by the weight loss, not directly by the drug.

Basically rimbonant (sp) is an appetite suppressant that works by blocking cannibinol receptors. It started life as a marijuana antagonist, and quickly transformed into an appetite suppressant.

Basically, it's a diet pill, and only marginally more effective than those already on the market.

17 posted on 09/07/2004 8:36:47 PM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

That's what I wanted to know about the FDA being "involved". Of course, I realize that anything can happen with the FDA and trials, but it sounds as if MBP is headed in the right direction.

Thanks for the info.


18 posted on 09/07/2004 8:40:52 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: woofie
can ya eat that pill with ice cream?

LOL. I am taking a drug called Topamax. It is usually used for epileptics. Then they found out people w/migraines can use it - then they found out that those people lost weight on the drug.

I go to university diabetes center which tries new treatments. The topamax is being used w/diabetics for weight loss. I can now fit clothes I haven't worn in 3 years, have dropped my insulin requirements by more than half and my doc says I'll probably get off of it. For the first time in years, my blood sugars are back to normal (menopause did a thing w/my diabetes, for years I took no meds, then everything went downhill fast).

The interesting thing w/this drug re weight loss is that tests so far show that people have kept of weight for 18+ months after stopping the drug.

I can eat ice cream :) but don't want to eat much of it. Sadly, it seems to affect your taste for chocolate, so I seem to have beat my choclate bar addiction.

They don't know how it all works together - for diabetics this drug helps with blood glucose control and food intake which in turn affects how much medicine you have to take.

There are some side affects, but other than losing a taste for chocolate and diet pepsi (stopped eating the chocolate, still drink the diet pepsi), the other physical effects left after I'd been on the meds a week or so. The doc thinks this drug might have some promise for the general population in the future as well.

19 posted on 09/07/2004 9:07:37 PM PDT by radiohead (Burn in hell, Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16
Is FDA involved in trials now?

I believe drug companies comply with FDA regulations as they go through 4 phases of testing new drugs. I'm not a drug researcher/investigator. Maybe this link can help you. I couldn't find anything quickly.

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

20 posted on 09/07/2004 9:40:40 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson