Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Keyes teaches sex education lesson to homosexual interviewer (possible transcript)
RenewAmerica.us ^ | 9-4-2004 | Mary Mostert

Posted on 09/04/2004 3:25:40 PM PDT by outlawcam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-367 next last
To: sinkspur

So, Mr. Expert, which seat are you running for, exactly?


121 posted on 09/04/2004 7:38:36 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I think Alan Keyes is a fine Christian and on this subject of marriage, he's right on. Is he harmful to our cause?
Kind of depends.
Sometimes he is not savy on how politics operates. It is very Alan Keyes to "say it like it is", that "by definition Mary Cheney is a selfish hedonist."
Now.... is that politically smart?
No it isn't.
122 posted on 09/04/2004 7:40:42 PM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The Republican voters wanted somebody other than Alan Keyes.

Well, if memory serves, he won two primaries.

And the presidential sweepstakes is hardly a fair barometer of that, since Dole and Bush were the preordained winners in '96 and '00. The Republican establishment had picked their guy well in advance of the primaries.

But the fact remains that Alan Keyes has millions of Republicans who love and respect him, and consider him to be a prime representative of their views.

123 posted on 09/04/2004 7:41:34 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
So, Mr. Expert, which seat are you running for, exactly?

I can't afford the pay cut.

124 posted on 09/04/2004 7:43:40 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Yeah...


125 posted on 09/04/2004 7:44:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
But the fact remains that Alan Keyes has millions of Republicans who love and respect him, and consider him to be a prime representative of their views.

I'll agree with that, though I'd disagree with "millions."

I'm done.

126 posted on 09/04/2004 7:45:22 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
-- Unless the rights of one or more of the parties involved -- [& in particular, - children] are being violated, governments have no legal basis to interfere in civil contracts of marriage.

This issue is a tempest in a teapot simply because government has given favorable tax & insurance benefits to 'traditional' married couples.
The solution is equally simple. End the favoritism.
Find other ways to promote family values.

(No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
-tpaine-

Gay people do have the right to get married.

Big of you to admit it.
Do you have the power to dictate the rules of peoples civil marriage contracts? -- More appropriately, do you see this power enumerated in our Constitution?

They have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex.

Sorry kid. But even sexual deviates have rights to life, liberty, and property. -- Unless they violate the rule of law.

127 posted on 09/04/2004 7:46:14 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
But the fact remains that Alan Keyes has millions of Republicans who love and respect him, and consider him to be a prime representative of their views.

be sure that my name is on that list.

I'm thankful that most of the Keyes haters don't live in Illinois and can't vote for the socialist baby killer Obama.

I live in Illinois and I vote.

128 posted on 09/04/2004 7:51:32 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
They have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex.
Sorry kid. But even sexual deviates have rights to life, liberty, and property. -- Unless they violate the rule of law.
Heh! We have four judges here in MA that agree with you. Three didn't and so we got gay marriage. That's why we all need the Federal Marriage Amendment.
129 posted on 09/04/2004 7:52:12 PM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

>>Jesus reprimanded the "experts on the Law" for their self-righteous, judgmental application of the law which was completely lacking in compassion and mercy.>>

Actually, no. He condemned them as hypocrites for following the letter of the law without knowing the heart of the law. He did not condemn them for a lack of compassion.


130 posted on 09/04/2004 7:53:02 PM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I'm glad you're there, my friend.

If you, and everyone like you, will drag everyone they know to the polls, the outcome will shake the world.



131 posted on 09/04/2004 7:56:42 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"LOL!! Cut the drama, EV. Only the Keyes cultists read these threads."

Untrue. For one thing YOU'RE not a Keyes cultist. For another, people in the media read these threads all the time. You are not only giving them ideas with which to hurt Allen's candidacy, you're proving to them that Allen's support is divided, fodder which further hurts his candidacy.

BTW, I like Allen Keyes, but would hardly consider myself a cultist. There are far too many other conservatives I like at least as much.

Now, if you want to accuse me of being a Reagan cultist, you would ALMOST be correct.

132 posted on 09/04/2004 8:03:10 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (Go George go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
For another, people in the media read these threads all the time. You are not only giving them ideas with which to hurt Allen's candidacy, you're proving to them that Allen's support is divided, fodder which further hurts his candidacy.

If I can think of it, they can think of it.

You give me far too much credit.

133 posted on 09/04/2004 8:05:37 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Mobilemitter
Jorge;"If there is ANY comparison at all, Keyes would be on the wrong side of the exchange."

Mobilemitter;Well, no, not really. Ya see, Jesus understood the meaning behind the text, the true "spirit" of the law. Keyes did not miss it. The grace of marriage extends to the two (that being the man and the woman) who will become one.

What are you talking about?

Nowhere in the Bible did Jesus debate the "experts on the law" about whether the meaning of marriage included homosexuality.

That was completely out of the question.

What Jesus debated the experts on the law, the Scribes and Pharisees on, was NOT their allowing unlawful marriages or sexual conduct, but rather their hypocritical sefl-righteous application of the law.

134 posted on 09/04/2004 8:07:16 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The Mayor of my small town and I are doing all we can locally. It's a very uphill struggle. The huge city of Chicago and all their dem voters dominate the rest of the state.

In the past several years the only republicans who have gotten anywhere have parroted the democrats. Anti death penality, anti guns,anti life, tax and spend and still call themselves republicans.

I feel that we are fortunate to finally have a candidate who is a god loving constitution loving conservative, a man I can vote for and vote for him I will.

It seems that to too many people this is a horse race and they don't want to vote for someone who is going to lose anyway. I'll vote for Alan Keyes and if he loses I will have done the right thing.

I also wonder if there may be some underlying racism involved too, after all Alan Keyes is very black and very smart to be so very black.

I wouldn't care if the man were shades of green. He's from Maryland? Who cares!

135 posted on 09/04/2004 8:08:20 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
It's not flawed. It's one hundred percent accurate. You're simply assuming it is the entirety of what the man believes about marriage.

Nowhere did I "assume" anything about Keye's belief about marriage.

I was simply responding to his argument as it was stated. And it was flawed. Procreation is not the ONLY reason homosexuality is wrong.

136 posted on 09/04/2004 8:10:45 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
The government has the right to define marriage. Gay people have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex.

It isn't BIG of me, it's a fact.

137 posted on 09/04/2004 8:12:42 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (Go George go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: outlawcam

bflr for great talking points.


138 posted on 09/04/2004 8:14:04 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I was simply responding to his argument as it was stated. And it was flawed. Procreation is not the ONLY reason homosexuality is wrong.

And of course, you misrepresent Mr. Keyes.

No way on God's green earth that he believes that that is the ONLY reason homosexuality is wrong.

Quit building your arguments on shifting sand.

139 posted on 09/04/2004 8:14:15 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ThirstyMan
Jorge;"The fact is many heterosexual couples are also incapable of procreation. Is their marriage therefore an "absurdity"?

No, to quote Dr. Keyes: "The point of the matter is that marriage as an institution involves procreation. It is impossible for homosexuals to procreate. Therefore they cannot marry."

Why is this not clear? He does not state that a marriage must have children to be a marriage.

Yes he does. Read his statment again;
"The point of the matter is that marriage as an institution involves procreation."

He says procreation is the "POINT" of marriage.

There is much more to marriage than procreation.

140 posted on 09/04/2004 8:16:06 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson