Posted on 09/04/2004 4:43:49 AM PDT by Clive
-
But they were just Radical Muslems expressing their need to be free of the oppressive yoke of post-Soviet Russia. They brought it upon themselves. We need to find these people, reach out to them, and help them find constructive ways to express their dismay at how the system is treating them.
/liberal bleeding heart mode off
@#$% that - we need to find them, hunt them down, and exterminate them. (single dad mode - switched on)
Can't wait for the Guardian....
Now that Russia has the world's sympathy, the Russians had better not actually do anything to defend themselves or everyone will just get mad at them and all of that sympathy for their victimhood will just be squandered.
This is the letter that I've been sending to all of the news outlets that can't bring themselves to say 'terrorist'.
"What in the hell is wrong with you people? You can't bring yourselves to make the horribly subjective decision that purposefully killing hundreds of children is terrorism!
Shame on you. Shame. Damn you.
You are a big part of the problem. If someone killed your child simply to bring about fear in others, you wouldn't be so smugly nonjudgmental.
Imagine that for a second. Think about it. Take a long hard look at those dead Russian children and join the human race. Who the hell are you people? You think you are so above the fray. You think evil is so relative. Separatists fight for separation, not to kill children, not for hate. Militants? Militant terrorists yes, but that is redundant.
I want you to answer this letter. I want you to justify this coddling of evil. I want you to justify the glorification you laud on these murderers of children. Answer me dammit!
Shame on you."
Toronto Sun : Globe & Mail :: New York Post : New York Times
n'est pas? (As we say at Kerry Headquarters and Welfare Canada offices.)
Also, "commandos""resistance".
Watch also the MSM verbs. It's always "resist", "oppose", "kill" never terrorize or murder.
You posted , " the Russians had better not actually do anything to defend themselves or everyone will just get mad at them and all of that sympathy for their victimhood will just be squandered".
ARE YOU SERIOUS? Do you really think the Russian people give a rat's behind about the world's opinion at a moment like this? Thank God Mr. Bush offered support to Russia. If France, Germany, and the U.N. don't like the Russian response then the hell with them.
No, John, I was not serious. Forgive me for having left off the sarcasm tag.
Michael Moore: Putin knew in advance and did nothing.
Hillarity: What did Putin know and when did he know it?
Daschle: I'm deeply Saddened for my Comrades
Kennedy: They're fighting an oppressive regime for basic human rights and universal health care. Get me another Vodka Vittoria.
There was a claaer on Savage last nght who had an accent and was claiming that the reason that many of the terrorists got away is becasue thay were former Red Army officers and Putin did not want them to be killed or on trial. Makes no sense based upon my understanding that the "practitioner of the religion of peace" started shooting first.
Ok...Made me spill my coffee.
John
Now, now, Bob. The libbers say the murdering terrorists just need a group-hug. That those innocent, dear, sweet children somehow asked for it. That there is no EVIL in the world, only bad countries doing bad things that makes insane, zealot SOB's slaughter the most innocent of all -- our children.
I'm sorry that is pure BS
Write more letters, ask them since when Michael Moore began writing their stories.
But, the Religion of Peace(TM) wouldn't massacre hundreds of innocent children just to prove a point...would they???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.