Posted on 09/03/2004 4:07:56 PM PDT by LS
It took a while to sink in, I have to admit. I didn't like the speech much---the content was fine, but Bush came across as flat compared to the Zell Milller/Arnold Schwartzenegger stemwiders.
But something gnawed at me. Bush's theme---one that he has allueded to in many contexts---emerged with momentous clarity. Hold on to your hats: Bush has reversed 70 years' worth of American political discourse. This is something even the Gipper didn't quite do, and, to be fair, he had to play Gen. John Buford to Bush's Gen. George Meade, holding the line until the reserves came up.
Still, what we witnessed last night (and forget the delivery for a moment) constituted a conceptual roll-back of the New Deal. I know. Some of you are thinking, "Huh? He spoke of expanding school programs and funding rural medical clinics." I know. But those were filler lines demanded by the realities of American life in the 21st century. It was like Lincoln throwing in a few comments about temperance before getting to the hthick meat of anti-slavery.
What made this speech a watershed was that Bush used the words "liberty," "freedom," "free," or "liberate" more than 25 times!!. (In contrast, in one of Bill Clinton's memorable 1992 speeches, he used a phrase like "family values" 11 times---but did not say the word "liberty" once!).
Those obsessed with next year's budget deficit or with the foolish Medicare prescription drug expansion are looking at the wrong thing. In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote that America was based on two principles, liberty and equality, but that the former had to remain preeminiment for the latter to succeed. Ever since the New Deal, the political theme in the United States, through Republican and Democratic administrations alike, has been that of equality. This was the essence of debates over busing, the Equal Rights Amendment, affirmative action, and, most recently, "gay marriage." Every one of these focused solely on equality, and ignored liberty.
As Inspector Clouseau said after smashing a piano and being told, "That was a priceless Steinway,"
. . . "Not any more."
Bush's transformation of political discourse, beginning first with discussions of spreading liberty abroad by citing Iraq, Afghanistan, and more broadly the entire Middle East, was tied to the "ownership society." It is so remarkable a change that I guarantee you many pundits simply won't see it for years. This is partly true because to many of them, the word "liberty" has little meaning.
How dramatic was Bush's shift? Consider: in his 2000 acceptance speech, Al Gore mentioned the "environment" at least four times, and used the words "equal" or "equality." But liberty was a no-show. "Free," "freedom," "liberate," and "liberty" together were mentioned fewer times than "Global Warming," which is to say, they were not mentioned once.
This is significant, and reflects a massive shift in the thinking of Americans. The New Deal is dead, finally. Tocqueville's dictum that a society that elevates liberty ahead of equality with have a great deal of both is again a governing principle in the United States.
There is one more conceptual shift yet to make, and it's too much to expect Bush to pull this off. Notice how no speaker on the Republican platform referred to "United States." Instead, it is always "America." This, too, is significant, because it reflects an ignorance of the principles of federalism that undergird our nation. But I believe we'll get to the point that even that changes. As the President said, the forces of liberty are on the march.
ping
Well at least you made me go hhhmmmm, indeed something to think about.
Yep, that is a very good summation. Liberty, should always be the guiding principle and yes we are the United States of America not just America.
Yes Karen Hughes is a potent speech writer. I noticed her orally reciting the speech, word for word right along with our President.
Yes Karen Hughes is a potent speech writer. I noticed her orally reciting the speech, word for word right along with our President.
Interesting thesis. To qoute John Kerry, "Would that it were."
I hope you are right.
Excellent post! I agree with you -- the new term is going to see some SWEEPING changes.
I wish that really proved something.
This is hugh. Kerry is coming off as a Protectionist and GWB is a Global thinker!
There was Moses now there is George W Bush saying go this way, it is time to open our own eyes and see we are the light of the world, we have a devine duty to be the light of the world. A vote for Kerry would be like unscrewing the bulb!
XLNT Post, thank you
Because he used a theme of liberty in a speech, he's repealing the New Deal? I'm all for nice little pipe dreams, but yours is a bit far-fetched. GWB is the one who, instead of minimizing the Dept of Education, greatly raised its rate of budgetary growth. Then he followed up with an unprecendented entitlement program. The New Deal has little to fear from George W. Bush.
Here is the thing, George Bush thinks about the future. He know what we do now, effects the future. Kerry cares about the here and now. Kerry only see things that will effect the next day or what ever the polls maybe.
Contrary to our Clintonian/democrat indoctrination,
words HAVE meaning, but only when spoken by someone
who MEANS WHAT HE SAYS.
Our President has told us repeatedly since 9-11 what we
face, and how we stand. Pundits and liberals, so used to
duplicitious misrepresentation , put no weight or reliance
on "mere words" but I believe you are correct, there is
no need to parse words with this man, it is called plain
speaking.
As Jesus said, for those who have ears, let him hear.
In principle I agree with that. Given free reign to make changes, I think Bush would undo the whole New Deal ideology. But we have to take it for what it is, a beginning down the right road.
The socialist changes that were implemented in this country won't be fixed overnight, and the odds are that we won't see much in the way of enhancing personal freedom during Bush's second term. Changing the way people think takes time. Personally, I hope we can stay this course for a few decades straight. People say we have to be bipartisan... not in my book. The other side has been railroading this country for longer than I've been alive, and as far as I'm concerned "turnabout is fair play" and "payback's a B!t(h.)
-sounds like Bush has been listening very well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.