Posted on 09/03/2004 12:07:04 PM PDT by kcvl
Rush Limbaugh's Surprising New Gal Pal
Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh must be feeling better after his separation in June from his third wife, Marta. He has a new girlfriend--and it's a surprising coupling that lends credence to the idea that opposites attract. She's none other than CNN anchor Daryn Kagan, reports Washington Post "Reliable Source" columnist Richard Leiby.
What happened to Marta???
Yep... the name indicates someone of priestly descent. There are levites whose name does not reveal their affiliation.
Hmmmm. Does that name derive from "kegging"?
Rush filed for divorce a while back. He gave no reason for it.
Kaganovich was a rigid Stalinist, and though he remained in the Presidium, quickly lost influence after Stalin's death in March 1953. In 1957, along with fellow hard-line Stalinist V. Molotov, he participated in an abortive coup against his former protege, Nikita Kruschev, who had over the past two years increasingly condemned his former master, Marshal Stalin. As a result, Kaganovich was forced to retire from the Presidium, and from the Central Committee, though he was permitted to retain his Party membership. Later removed from the Party in 1964, he committed suicide in 1991 after the defeat of the August coup.
I do know for sure that Lazar Kaganovich had at least one brother who emigrated to America and shortened his name.
Things could be worse!
CNN anchor slammed Dems ... again
On the July 14 edition of CNN Live Today, CNN anchor Daryn Kagan suggested to CNN Capitol Hill correspondent Ed Henry that internal strife and the inability to get anything done is a characteristic of the Democratic Party.
She looks like she'd chop you up for stew meat.
There are variations but it means someone of Levite origin.
What's his bit?-----'half his brain tied behind him'? He'd better redo the math.
Wow. Rush has been married for 18 years.
Check the BPL. I read a book from there by his nephew.... about Lazar Kaganovich.
The conservative male Elizabeth Taylor. LOL
Rush has been feeding her lines and edumacating her.
I'm ahead of you. I read that very same book, "The Wolf of The Kremlin," already. I sped read it (my mom used to teach Evelyn Wood speed reading course) at a remainder bin in a bookstore. If I remember now his nephew's name was Kahan but it is not impossible that other relatives here use the name Kagan.
In an earlier post, I wrote:
I like talkative, energetic women. I would really dig Camille [Paglia] if I could change two things about her:
After reviewing an interview Paglia did in the libertarian mag Reason, I discovered that she does NOT believe "age-of-consent laws should be scrapped completely," only that they should be lowered further than current American mores will allow.
This is her opinion, in her words:
I believe that government should confine itself to the public realm and that it should be as stripped down as possible, within reason. It should not be burdened by excess bureaucracy.I feel that government has no right to intrude into the private realm of consensual behavior. Therefore, I say that I'm for the abolition of all sodomy laws. I'm for abortion rights. I'm for the legalization of drugs--consistent with alcohol regulations. I'm for not just the decriminalization but the legalization of prostitution. Again, prostitutes must not intrude into the public realm. I think it's perfectly reasonable to say that civil authorities have the right to say that prostitutes should not be loitering near schools, or on the steps of churches, or blocking entrances to buildings and so on. Prostitution should be perfectly legal, but it cannot interfere with other people's access to the public realm.
Furthermore, the public realm is not owned by Judeo-Christianity. It is shared by people of all cultural and religious backgrounds. Therefore, I'm arguing for the Greco-Roman or pagan line, which is very tolerant of homosexuality and even of man-boy love. I've argued controversially for a reduction in the age of consent to 14--there are some countries in the world that do have that. I'm open to considering even lowering it further.
That's the way I would be separate from a conservative libertarian, who would not necessarily take the position of the legalization of drugs or the very positive attitude I have toward prostitutes and pornographers and drag queens. I take a celebratory attitude toward them. Similarly, I think that most conservative libertarians would not agree with my idea of lowering the age of consent and so on.
Upon additional research and further reflection, I realize that the two above differences between Ms. Paglia and myself are only the tip of the iceberg. While I admire her bravado in challenging the leftist feminist majority and her defense of conservatism and conservatives, there is much too large a gulf between our principles to make her a suitable objet de mon amour.
L.N. Smithee regrets the error.
That's the book!
Here is a good site for her "ratings". some of these are pretty funny.
http://www.rateitall.com/i-23046-daryn-kagan.aspx
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.