I understand your outrage. But if we kill civilians indiscriminately, then the terrorists win: we have become like them.
Bull Puckey!
Unless, of course, you mean letting missiles loose without locking the target acquisition information into the targeting system of the weapon.(which would be an utter waste of munitions and money).
Oh yeah. One more thing. Japan. No, wait. We did target two cities specifically, so I guess your right again there with that pesky adjective "indiscriminately".
Good thing for us you were not running the show in WWII.
I'm not so sure about this. We didn't become like the Hirohito Japs when we nuked Japan, we simply did what was needed to stop the insanity and bloodshed. Then we all got back to the business of peace, freedom and prosperity.
Nobody wants a situation where America, Russia or any other power has to bomb an Islamic city to hell, but it looks like the Muslims are doing everything they can to force this situation. Slaughtering children like this cannot be taken lying down, and a simple eye-for-an-eye retaliation will not stop them or even slow them down.
Cowardly Islam has chosen an invisible battlefield, (called 'terrorism'), to perpetuate their age-old vision of an Islamic world by ridding the earth of "infidels". They kill women and children, and they hide behind women and children. They murder, they assassinate, they behead, they kidnap, they infiltrate, they hijack, they blow up buildings, they create havoc for the 'infidel' all over the world. If it does not cease rather soon I predict the end of Islam is just around the corner.
Yes, that's why the terrorist won ww2.
We shouldn't kill civilians indiscriminately. We should specifically target Muslim ones.
Also true and the other horn of the dilema.
At some point, overwhelming force is the ONLY thing such terrorists and even some people groups
understand at all.