Skip to comments.
Today Cheers Arnold, Stephie Admits Kerry's in Trouble, CBS Discovers RNC - What a Morning!
Posted on 09/01/2004 5:08:16 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Multi-morning-show ping to the Today Show ping list.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Finally, Katie raised the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth: "how do you feel about the controversy?" Interestingly, Kerrey didn't claim it was a W campaign set-up. To the contrary, he said the Swiftees "hate" Kerry for his 1971 testimony. That suggests their ads are authentic. I wonder: Perhaps Kerrey also resents Kerry's 1971 testimony? Could he be supporting his party's nominee through somewhat clenched teeth?
To: governsleastgovernsbest; DrewsDad; HiJinx; MeekOneGOP; Gracey; anymouse; SwinneySwitch; ...
Fretted Sawyer, effectively acknowledging that Kerry is in deep trouble: "Can he turn it around or is it too late?" Steph: "It's not too late, the race is still tied. The next big moment is the debates." Kerry has admitted that Bush is an excellent debater. If Steph thinks he can win the debates, kerry has already started with on foot in the mud. BTW Steph, the race is NOT tied anymore.
4
posted on
09/01/2004 5:13:36 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Vote for kerry.< /sarcasm> Well, he has been on both sides of every issue.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
You've whetted my appetite..I'll peek....briefly...;) Thanks for the report!
5
posted on
09/01/2004 5:14:31 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good report--I watched an interview of Lynne and Elizabeth Cheney by Bill Hemmer on CNN. Right out of the blocks, Hemmer asked them to comment on Alan Keyes' description of homosexuals as "selfish hedonists." Elizabeth handled the question deftly--essentially not dignifying it with a answer, then quoted her father on his love for both of his daughters.
6
posted on
09/01/2004 5:14:46 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Perhaps Kerrey also resents Kerry's 1971 testimony? Could he be supporting his party's nominee through somewhat clenched teeth?Very interesting thought. Could well be. Can there be any doubt that Bob Kerrey thinks he's a better man than John Kerry?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
glgb:
Thanks as always. Where do we send our contributions for your DVR?
8
posted on
09/01/2004 5:16:05 AM PDT
by
The G Man
(Hi, Mark! I see you watching me!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I can't bear to watch them anymore so thanks for the great report.
9
posted on
09/01/2004 5:17:03 AM PDT
by
NewYorker
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good Job!! Thanks for the overview, gov.
10
posted on
09/01/2004 5:17:21 AM PDT
by
toomanygrasshoppers
("Hold on to your hats.....it's going to be a bumpy night")
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Arnold's speech was pretty good for a RINO.
To: MEG33
You might want to make a special effort to catch the Sawyer/Stephie chat. I think it was the most telling. Steph obviously has excellent sources inside the Kerry campaign, and the picture clearly emerges of a desperate, angry Kerry and a campaign in tatters, sensing that it's going down.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Bob Kerrey might have created another flip-flop controversy. Kerrey claimed that Kerry would have supported the Iraq resolution "even if he knew what we know today," [i.e., the lack of discovered WMDs]. But wait a minute! Jamie Rubin said that about Kerry a week ago, but then was forced to apologize and say it's not true."Is that true?
Did the Kerry camp really back away from that position? I have to be honest here, and I (like most FReepers) pay real close attention to this stuff ... but I really and trully have NO IDEA what Kerry's position on Iraq is.
13
posted on
09/01/2004 5:18:16 AM PDT
by
The G Man
(Hi, Mark! I see you watching me!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Great recap, as always!
Many new people are being brought in (to Kerry campaign) but no one is being fired.
The Kerry Campaign must by a Top 10 employer in this country by now. During the Berger flap, it was noted that he had 100's of "advisors".
14
posted on
09/01/2004 5:18:22 AM PDT
by
randita
To: governsleastgovernsbest
What a morning indeed..
Arnold had hypnotized "all the beasts"..that might be a first.
WE may have to change the constitution :)
15
posted on
09/01/2004 5:18:46 AM PDT
by
evad
(We are free to draw our conclusions as to who's credible.I can't help it if your perception is wrong)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
16
posted on
09/01/2004 5:19:42 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(NAM Vet's Revenge.......It's about time.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
17
posted on
09/01/2004 5:20:12 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
To: The G Man
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"It's not too late, the race is still tied."
It is NOT tied. I don't think it ever really was! Bush has it all over Kerry and it will be more and more obvious as we go along. Character REALLY counts!!
19
posted on
09/01/2004 5:21:05 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
('Stay together, pay the soldiers, forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus, to his sons)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks...I look for this ping every morning. ;^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson