Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim Brotherhood, Nazis and Al Qaeda [Speech by John Loftus]
Navy SEALS.com ^ | August 25, 2004 | Jewish Community News, & John Loftus

Posted on 08/26/2004 1:04:56 PM PDT by 68skylark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I'm honestly not familiar with the author. He could be a solid source, or maybe not. Does anyone else have reactions?

I've become a little more interested in the Muslim Brotherhood in the past few days -- I live just down the road from Notre Dame University. They were going to have a certain Muslim Professor come to teach, but his visa was denied by Homeland Security. The professor, Tariq Ramadan, is reported to be related to the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.

1 posted on 08/26/2004 1:04:59 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

ping


2 posted on 08/26/2004 1:06:09 PM PDT by escapefromboston (the real Green Lantern Returns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Loftus is kind of a wacky self-promoter who loves to simplify, leap to conclusions and make grandiose statements.

But he's always an interesting read.

3 posted on 08/26/2004 1:14:58 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Loftus rocks. IMO, he's solid but often painted as a liberal.


4 posted on 08/26/2004 1:16:42 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
And the CIA lied to Congress and said they didn't know who was on the payroll in Afghanistan, except the Saudis. But it was not true. A small section CIA knew perfectly well that we had once again hired the Arab Nazis and that we were using them to fight our secret wars.

If you want to know more about the CIA and Afganistan, I recommend picking up "Ghost Wars".. author's name escapes me at the moment. Two interesting things stand out.. MI6 as well as the CIA were heavily involved in that conflict, and MI6 couldn't understand why we were arming the mujadeen with Stingers... guess that came back to haunt us. Another is an exchange between a Soviet intelligence agent and a CIA agent in which the Soviet agent basically said, "you know, they'll turn on you in a heartbeat". Guess we thought we knew better.
5 posted on 08/26/2004 1:18:35 PM PDT by Bulwark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: oceanview

FYI


7 posted on 08/26/2004 1:22:30 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark; Dajjal

The propaganda minister for the Muslim Brotherhood in the 50's and the 60's, Sayyid Qutb, is known as the "Trotsky of the Islamist movement." His writings have inspired many modern terrorists movements, including Al Qaeda.


8 posted on 08/26/2004 1:25:26 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alberuni
Yeah, I realize that family connections don't necessarily determine how someone thinks. That's your point, right? But in this case it's interesting anyway.
9 posted on 08/26/2004 1:34:26 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

The author is a very solid researcher who has written a number of interesting books about Communist use of Nazi, Catholic, and Western agents against their own governments.


10 posted on 08/26/2004 1:35:25 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alberuni

From another thread.....my post

One should not visit the sins of the father on the kid, but the son of the founder of the Brotherhood? This guy had advocated stoning for cheating wives, albeit with conditions to satisfy the naive. I view him as the enabler of jihad, all dressed nice and all, softspoken, ostensibly rational but very very smart.

AQ is simply an extension of the MB, long sheltered in Saudi.

Remember, Zawahiri was an MB'er. Osama's mentor Azzam was also MB.


11 posted on 08/26/2004 1:36:00 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark

Ghost Wars BUMP! Steven Coll.

Also, James Risen and Milt Bearden's The Main Enemy is worthwhile.


12 posted on 08/26/2004 1:36:53 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Muslims can cite incidents of usury and betrayal by European World Powers.

Unfortunately, we the USA will suffer the back-lash as the "Infidel Crusaders". Didn't the original Crusaders come from Germany and France?

Germany and France get a free pass. Islam, Naziism, Thugocracy, Dictatorship--all have more in common to the ME than does America.


13 posted on 08/26/2004 1:39:25 PM PDT by jolie560 (hE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Bulwark
"Guess we thought we knew better."

Obviously there was blowback, but the belief that we were wrong to arm the mujahadeen is itself grievously wrong. The Soviet disaster in Afghanistan does not happen without the Stingers and without the disaster the Soviet Union does not fall either as it did or when it did.

Asking if it was wrong to arm the mujas is like asking if it was wrong to send the Sovbiets 3/4 million trucks, 8500 Sherman tanks. 7,000 P39 & P 40 aircraft to help them fight their Great Patriotic War against the Nazis. BTW we sent aid BEFORE we were at war. What was the result? 50 years on the nuclear mousetrap until Ronald Reagan, Bill Casey brought down the house. Arming the mujas was no small part in that effort.

It's very possible that some power we are enlisting to help us with al Queda will come back to bite us in the future. But since we can't see the future we can only deal with one enemy ata time.

15 posted on 08/26/2004 2:57:19 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alberuni
The Muslim Brotherhood is definitely the father of all the Islamist groups. It's been around forever. Because it has always been virulently anti-communist. . . .

I always thought that radical Muslims are strongly anti-communist. But when I read about Prof. Ramadan (the guy who was denied a visa to teach at Notre Dame) it sounds like he's building a philosophy that's more or less compatible with Marxism. So that makes me wonder. Am I mis-understanding his work? Is he not a radical Muslim? Are radical Muslims changing their doctrine?

For example, here's one article that I'm using for background: Tariq Ramadan's Two-Faced Islam. The West Is the Land of Conquest

16 posted on 08/26/2004 3:41:17 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Sayyed Quttub and Maududi (who started the JamaatIslaami in Pakistan), while anticommies, overlaid their islami with the Vanguard prole rhetoric and organistational skills of the Marxistts to galvanise their followers.

THey haven't changed, We overlooked it for decades because they were a bulwark against COmmunism.

Ramadan is building on the sayings of these two, layering it with enough PC feely good rhetoric now, but, essentially supporting AQ which styles itself as the VanGuard, Tipof the Spear of the drive to worldwide Wahhabism.


17 posted on 08/26/2004 3:45:06 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: alberuni
He doesn't seem very militant or likely to be connected to terrorism.

I've just started learning a little about Dr. Ramadan, and I am a long way away from reaching the conclusions you've reached about him.

I suspect that Homeland Security probably has some information that isn't public (although the public information is worrisome enough). I think I trust their judgment on this matter -- much more than I trust the ND administration to make the right decisions.

19 posted on 08/26/2004 5:00:23 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
BTW we sent aid BEFORE we were at war.

Not to the Soviets. We only did lend-lease with the UK prior to our entrance to the war. Lend-lease was extended to the Soviets on June 11th, 1942, which I hope you realize is after we entered the war.

It's very possible that some power we are enlisting to help us with al Queda will come back to bite us in the future.

By "some power" I hope you mean the Saudis, because it will no doubt come back to bite us in the future.
20 posted on 08/26/2004 5:59:42 PM PDT by Bulwark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson