Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution's “Molecular Clock”: Not So Dependable After All?
PLOS (Public Library of Science) ^ | 8/17/04 | Staff

Posted on 08/25/2004 10:14:24 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo

DNA mutates, and it's a good thing it does. If it didn't, there could only be one kind of life, not the millions there are today, and species could not adapt to new challenges. This is because mutations in genes—the coding portion of DNA—are the raw material for evolution. However, genes make up a surprisingly small fraction of our DNA. If the genome were a cookbook, its 30,000-odd genetic recipes would be scattered among millions of pages of apparently meaningless nonsense.

Mutations affect all DNA, not just the genes, and this provides population geneticists with a veritable toolbox of methods useful, for example, in DNA profiling. Importantly, all these methods rely on the idea of a “molecular clock,” the notion that mutations rain down on noncoding DNA like a fine drizzle, so constantly that genetic similarity is a good measure of evolutionary time. Thus, if orangutans diverged from humans twice as long ago as did chimpanzees, on any given piece of DNA we would find twice as many differences between the orangutan sequence and the human sequence as between humans and chimps. The mutations are marking time.

If the molecular clock works, scientists can do wonderful things like estimating how long ago it was that the common ancestor of all humans lived, or when birds evolved from dinosaurs. The clock assumes that mutations occur independently of each other and at a constant rate. By analyzing thousands of noncoding DNA sequences scattered throughout the human genome, Edward Vowles and William Amos have found that the clock is anything but constant. Instead, a mutation in one spot in the genome affects the chance of getting another mutation nearby.

Not all noncoding DNA is made up of benign tracts of random letters. Some sequences appear to be more difficult to copy than others, and these trouble spots can give rise to alphabetic stuttering. DNA is made up of four component chemical units, called nucleotides, which are often referred to by their initial letters: A, C, G, and T. Stuttering occurs when the same pairs or triplets of letters occur together, for example ACACAC. Such regions are called microsatellites, and instead of mutating by swapping one letter for another, as most nucleotides do, these sequences evolve mainly by gaining and losing triplets or pairs like “AC.”

In this study, Vowles and Amos used the published sequence of the human genome to track down and compare thousands upon thousands of microsatellites. If the molecular clock ran smoothly, they would expect to find no similarity at all between the DNA sequences surrounding any pair of unrelated microsatellites. To their surprise, they found the complete reverse, with entirely unrelated microsatellites showing widespread and obvious similarities in their flanking DNA. This meant that mutations near microsatellites were not random, but favored certain letters in certain positions. Just as a new shipwreck will attract its own special community of marine life, so microsatellites appear gradually to change the surrounding DNA towards a common pattern. The result is convergent evolution, an unusual state of affairs where, as time goes by, DNA sequences become more similar, not less.

As yet, the exact mechanisms remain unclear, though it probably has something to do with how comfortably different combinations of letters sit next to each other. In English, “U” always follows “Q” and “B” never follows “V.” Similar rules may apply to DNA, albeit on a much subtler level. For example, if a microsatellite contains alternating As and Cs, the flanking regions also tend to have As at alternate positions, in phase with the As in the microsatellite. It is as if the DNA prefers the pattern in the microsatellite to extend into the flanking DNA, rather than abruptly stopping at the end of the microsatellite.

These findings suggest that it may be wise to take the notion of a molecular clock at face value. With a perfect clock, two or three identical mutations would be highly unlikely, but we now know that this may be possible near microsatellites. Vowles and Amos estimate that as much as 30% of the genome may show evidence of convergent evolution, simply because microsatellites are so common. These mutation biases probably exist to a lesser extent in most sequences. Once scientists understand more fully how and where these biases operate, they may be able to estimate more accurately the risk of any given mutation occurring, be it one that causes human disease or makes a virus more virulent. These findings represent yet another windfall from the Human Genome Project, and act as a powerful reminder that unexpected results always lurk around the corner as we delve deeper into the secret world of the genome.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dna; evolution; genome; intelligentdesign; molecularclock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-352 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

To: Dimensio
I gave up on replying to Dataman some time ago.

Sometimes you have to stick your finger in it every once in a while just to see if it's still there.

102 posted on 08/25/2004 1:43:19 PM PDT by balrog666 ("One man's theology is another man's belly laugh." -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

It's not at all the same as "I can just tell." If your wife (friend, son, whatever) tells you something, and I ask you how you know such-and-such, and you say, "My wife made that clear," that answers the question. That's not the same thing as your saying, "I can just tell."

In what way has God made Himself known? In many ways, of which I responded with one, since it's one knowable by everyone: by the things which He has made.


103 posted on 08/25/2004 1:49:37 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Sometimes you have to stick your finger in it every once in a while just to see if it's still there.

Apparently someone didn't like me revealing that bit about Dataman's past...
104 posted on 08/25/2004 1:49:59 PM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall
It's not at all the same as "I can just tell." If your wife (friend, son, whatever) tells you something, and I ask you how you know such-and-such, and you say, "My wife made that clear," that answers the question. That's not the same thing as your saying, "I can just tell."

The difference here is that you're appealing to the very entity in question to provide your evidence. That's assuming your conclusion.

In what way has God made Himself known? In many ways, of which I responded with one, since it's one knowable by everyone: by the things which He has made.

Can you be more specific? Why should I believe that "He" has made anything, or even that "He" exists in the first place?
105 posted on 08/25/2004 1:51:50 PM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo; newgeezer

DNA is not what scientists seem to think it is. It is not the building blocks of life, it is not the plans for building life forms. It is only a couple of switches for a couple of features in an otherwise much more complex machine.


106 posted on 08/25/2004 1:51:54 PM PDT by biblewonk (neither said any of them that aught of the things which he possessed was his own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
DNA is not what scientists seem to think it is. It is not the building blocks of life, it is not the plans for building life forms. It is only a couple of switches for a couple of features in an otherwise much more complex machine.

From where did you come by this information?
107 posted on 08/25/2004 1:53:24 PM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

A bit of knowledge about data and the complexity of living organisms.


108 posted on 08/25/2004 1:54:18 PM PDT by biblewonk (neither said any of them that aught of the things which he possessed was his own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
A bit of knowledge about data and the complexity of living organisms.

Could you be more specific? Do you have refence to a peer-reviewed scientific article?
109 posted on 08/25/2004 1:56:07 PM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Apparently someone didn't like me revealing that bit about Dataman's past...

Astounding!

110 posted on 08/25/2004 2:04:20 PM PDT by balrog666 ("One man's theology is another man's belly laugh." -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
Demonstrate to all of us that there is no connection between atheistic evolution and atheism.

This is akin to, "Demonstrate to all of us that there is no connection between Church of the Creator Christianity and the Church of the Creator."

A bit unfair, no?
111 posted on 08/25/2004 2:09:04 PM PDT by whattajoke (.)(.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog; ClearCase_guy

As you suggest, Wonder Warthog, evolution/gene mutation does seem to go hand in hand with added stress. A microbial evolutionist here at MSU separated a culture of bacteria into three separate cultures a decade or so ago and has followed their evolution/ gene mutation through about 30,000 generations. Their evolution does seem to be punctuated and stress-induced. Interestingly, the three separate cultures of the same bacteria have had different gene mutations that allow it to cope with the same stressor. The different cultures are evolving in different ways to deal with stresses to their environment. Pretty amazing.


112 posted on 08/25/2004 2:09:09 PM PDT by SCChemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

I am a chemist, and that happens all the time.


113 posted on 08/25/2004 2:12:51 PM PDT by SCChemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SCChemist
"A microbial evolutionist here at MSU separated a culture of bacteria into three separate cultures a decade or so ago and has followed their evolution/ gene mutation through about 30,000 generations. Their evolution does seem to be punctuated and stress-induced. Interestingly, the three separate cultures of the same bacteria have had different gene mutations that allow it to cope with the same stressor. The different cultures are evolving in different ways to deal with stresses to their environment. Pretty amazing."

WOW! Veeerrryyy interesting. Thanks for the info.

114 posted on 08/25/2004 2:16:06 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

Ad hominem alert:

Since you are so fond of bible verses, I thought I'd throw one your way:

Deuteronomy 19:28
Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.

PS, love the picture in your profile!


115 posted on 08/25/2004 2:16:36 PM PDT by whattajoke (.)(.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

I will be more specific,

God, the God of the Bible so that the phrase 'this God' in unneeded, indwelt me with the Holy Spirit and I began to speak in unknown tongues, just as is written in the Scriptures. I tell you I felt the Spirit well up from my innermost being. It felt great.

Years later a young man whose parents were concerned about his drug use sent him to see me. He was already a believer, but this was an obstacle. We prayed, and he also received the Holy Spirit with the sign of speaking in unknown tounges. He said it felt so great that he realized that drug use was just a cheap imitation of the feeling he got from the Holy Spirit- that this was the real thing.

The euphoria does not continue, but the speaking in unknown tounges does.

My grandmother was healed from lupus. I remember how frail she was in 1988 when I was home on leave from the military. I remembered thinking that it would be the last time I saw her alive on Earth. She is still alive today and she has a doctors report saying that she does not have a trace of lupus.

My step-brother in law was in a car wreck as a teenager, He had to wear a leg brace because his leg was crooked. A preacher prayed over him and do you that his leg straightened out that very day. Right in front of his family. They threw the leg brace away- it did not fit from that moment forward because his leg was straight and remains so to this day.

These are events from my life but many such events are recorded in the Bible. Read the 53rd chapter (or is it 51?)of Isaiah and realize that this man was a prophet of the living God speaking of Jesus Christ. The Bible is full of fulfilled prophecy. In fact, that is how they got to be in the bible- that is how they got to be acknowledged as really representing God.

Perhaps no amount of testimony will convince you. Perhaps you will dismiss it all. If so, this is not a head problem, but a heart problem.


116 posted on 08/25/2004 2:17:13 PM PDT by Ahban (I doubt they are monitoring FR, but loose lips and all of that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Deuteronomy 19:28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.

BWAHAHA! Delicious!

117 posted on 08/25/2004 2:18:05 PM PDT by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Astounding!

They profess NO shame, but they do have mighty quick fingers on the Abuse button.

118 posted on 08/25/2004 2:18:08 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

"Festival of Abuse Button Mania" placemarker


119 posted on 08/25/2004 2:22:00 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
,Either you guys have been less than persuasive despite the use of government schools, PBS and Time Life books, or there isn't any convincing evidence.

...or all the schooling in the world will not keep a large fraction of the population from being pig-ignorant. No offense.

120 posted on 08/25/2004 2:22:40 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-352 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson