[discostu]

No, according to the facts eyewitness accounts are unreliable. Maybe what they think they saw happened really happened, maybe it didn't. The only way to tell is to collate the eye witness testimony with the physical evidence, eye witness testimony that conflicts with the physical evidence should be thrown out. If a debris pattern doesn't match what should be expected from an explosion in the air then eyewitnesses that say they saw an explosion are wrong.

[Embedded Freeper]

You are so obsessed.
You keep posting to me things we are not even talking about.
Why don't you write a book or hire someone to bounce your theories and opinions off of.
Look at your fingers when you type.
Do you see them?
But you know they are not really typing, right?
Because you witness it with your eyes.
Heck man, everyone might as well be blind with no brain power or intelligence according to your facts.
Sorry when I witness a stop sign on the street, I believe it is there.
I won't be posting to you unless you address the issues I brought up.

[Embedded Freeper]

And btw, apparently a miracle has happened!
There was an explosion unfortunately.
Now if the eyewitnesses will only retract their remembrance of SEEING an explosion, you will believe it.