Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Ok ok ok ok I am totally full of anger. ;>)
What is obvious to you about me is the same as you seeing a truck when there wasn't one.
Thanks for making my point.
I just was an eyewitness to my hand typing this, but that is junk. According to your opinion---sorry facts---anything the eye witnesses isn't really happening.
So if you don't see this I will concede you are right.
883 posted on 08/26/2004 6:20:12 PM PDT by Embedded Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies ]


To: Embedded Freeper

No, according to the facts eyewitness accounts are unreliable. Maybe what they think they saw happened really happened, maybe it didn't. The only way to tell is to collate the eye witness testimony with the physical evidence, eye witness testimony that conflicts with the physical evidence should be thrown out. If a debris pattern doesn't match what should be expected from an explosion in the air then eyewitnesses that say they saw an explosion are wrong.


888 posted on 08/27/2004 7:55:39 AM PDT by discostu (That which does not make me stronger kills me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson