Skip to comments.
Bush at "Unbeatable" Approval Level (Yee-hah!)
SF Gate ^
| 8/04
| Sparks
Posted on 08/23/2004 7:20:29 AM PDT by pabianice
"...Majority Approves of President
"Now that we all know Kerry is more warlike than the president -- after all, he would have removed Saddam without any evidence of WMDs -- Bush's job approval in the latest Gallup poll is now at 51 percent, almost identical to Clinton's 52 percent rating in August 1996 and President Reagan's 54 percent mark in August 1984. Last week, USA Today reported that "no president who has been at or above 50 percent at this point in an election year has lost."
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; gwb2004; jobapproval; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: RogueIsland
Has any one said where it will be aired?
21
posted on
08/23/2004 7:42:59 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(prayers for all)
To: pabianice
Its a good indicator, I have been watching approval numbers closely as well, that being said....No excuses! Get out there every day and do something to make sure we get a landslide for our President! Campaign like tomorrow is election day! Every day counts.
Hail to the King Baby.
To: pabianice
From the article...
How many lies can you count in this statement? There are three. First, Nixon was not president in December 1968; second, the South Vietnamese, predominantly Buddhists, don't celebrate Christmas; and, third, Kerry was never in Cambodia. Nice point about the Buddhists. Is Adam Sparks a FReeper?
23
posted on
08/23/2004 7:45:58 AM PDT
by
tubebender
(If I had known I would live this long I would have taken better care of myself...)
To: RogueIsland
24
posted on
08/23/2004 7:47:42 AM PDT
by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: pabianice
Bob Dole just performed the most useful thing he has ever done politically for the Republicans by noting that Kerry never "bled" and calling on him to apologize to all the veterans he slandered when he came back from Vietnam. This has got to get play in the Old Line media because he has been very non-confrontational in the past, unfortunately including his campaign in 1996! I think the ABCNBCCBSCNNMSMBC hacks have a good opinion of him and will not ignore the remark, especially now that that the Swift boat issues have gained some legs.
The focus should shift from the "he said-they said" argument about Kerry's action in the field for the three months he was actually in the combat theater 35 years ago to the, in my mind, more serious problem he has with his post-war treachery. He has NO wiggle room on that! And that issue is actually more germane to the issue of what America is all about in the post-911 world. The vast majority of voters will not elect a president who hates our country and has visibly and concretely documented it time and again. Kerry's chickens, or maybe buzzards, are coming home to roost after 30 years of running wild!
25
posted on
08/23/2004 7:50:46 AM PDT
by
laishly
To: goldstategop
President Bush's approval rating will go UP in the face of the Kerry Campaign implosion. I wouldn't necessarily count on that (although I certainly hope you're right). I just think Kerry's numbers will drop more than Dubya's.
26
posted on
08/23/2004 7:51:08 AM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: pabianice
Some say that the right track wrong track is more important than approval rating. They are full of it though IMO.
To: mlbford2
"Hillary is launching her first salvo of torpedoes."
Did the pundit say that or you? And what exactly are the torpedoes? I want juicy details.
28
posted on
08/23/2004 7:55:34 AM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom!)
To: pabianice
Bush's job approval is running at avg of 51% at Rasmussen Report since 4 July 2004.
29
posted on
08/23/2004 7:57:13 AM PDT
by
Inge C
To: Pharmboy
That would have been too late. This has been dominating the news for two weeks and still more needs be done to undermine the Fraud. It takes a lot to get through the thick heads of our fellow citizens.
Now after Kerry reels for a month we can hit him with more bombs and prevent him from regaining his balance.
30
posted on
08/23/2004 7:57:49 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(My Father was 10x the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
To: The G Man
Isn't it incredible how all your leftist acquaintances and the liberal media are so dumbstruck and mystified the day after an election because they spent the previous 16 months bashing republicans and not paying attention to what real people think? I can't wait for the debates and the election.
31
posted on
08/23/2004 7:58:24 AM PDT
by
rabidralph
(Arm Tibet!)
To: Lee'sGhost
I just saw a former Clinton advisor saying Kerry is in deep trouble. Not something you would hear from the "Bush is a deserter" Kerry camp/Kerry Main Stream Media support at all cost folks. It was obvious this Clinton guy was not reading from the DNC counter attack talking points issued over the weekend.
32
posted on
08/23/2004 8:05:53 AM PDT
by
mlbford2
(In TX, orange alert means releasing the safety on your shotgun)
To: tubebender
South Vietnam was a Roman Catholic country.
33
posted on
08/23/2004 8:06:06 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(Did Kerry commit murder in Viet Nam?)
To: pabianice
Let's not drop our packs just yet, though. Demoncrats are the party of lies, liars, and dirty tricks after all.
If we get complacent, some people will stay home thinking Bush has already won. That would be a mistake.
34
posted on
08/23/2004 8:07:14 AM PDT
by
No_Outcome_But_Victory
(Reagan preferred to shoot the bear... the verdict of history will be simple: nice aim.)
To: pabianice
None of this matters right now...November 2, 2004...That is the only date that matters. Pride cometh before the fall. Let's just keep plugging the message for W's 2nd term and let the other side fight these battles. It shouldn't matter who the opposition candidate is, let's focus on who and what we're voting for, the opposition can only focus on who they're voting against because they have NOTHING to vote for!!! At the end of the day, that's not a very inspiring thought.
35
posted on
08/23/2004 8:07:30 AM PDT
by
blteague
To: OneTimeLurker
Some say that the right track wrong track is more important than approval rating. They are full of it though IMO.The problem with that question is that many that figure we are on wrong track would think Bush's track is better than a Kerry track.
To: pabianice
James Carville and Mary Matlin were in my town over the weekend. (Colorado Springs) The local news had a clip of Carville spouting off some of his wildeyed rhetoric. He said something to the effect, that should Bush win reelection it would be the greatest upset victory of all time. LOL Carville off the wall, again!
37
posted on
08/23/2004 8:10:43 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
To: blteague
None of this matters right now...November 2, 2004...That is the only date that matters. Pride cometh before the fall. Let's just keep plugging the message for W's 2nd term and let the other side fight these battles. It shouldn't matter who the opposition candidate is, let's focus on who and what we're voting for, the opposition can only focus on who they're voting against because they have NOTHING to vote for!!! At the end of the day, that's not a very inspiring thought. Two thumbs up!
38
posted on
08/23/2004 8:13:03 AM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: pabianice
Let's not get overconfident! Remember, our man has to overcome massive voter fraud (you think 2000 was bad, you ain't seen nothing yet) as well as the hostile and dishonest news media, who are not reluctant to spin and obfuscate for the Democrats. We still have work to do. Write letters to the editor of your local paper, volunteer at GOP headquarters, talk to your neighbors. Let us not lose this election because we were complacent - and because we believed too many polls.
To: Shortwave
Old lib ploy; "We are smart and you are a hick." I first heard it in the Eisenhower/Stevenson campaign. They have probably been saying it before then.
Another of their ploys is to scream shrilly that the Republicans want to take away their social security checks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson