Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Releases Details of Clean Coal Proposal
Electric Power DailyElectric Power Daily (page 5) ^ | 20 Aug 04 | I got the rope

Posted on 08/23/2004 5:44:59 AM PDT by I got the rope

Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry has unveiled a detailed version of his plan to invest $10-billion in clean coal technologies over the next 10 years, including a doubling of clean coal research on integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants and other “zero-emissions” clean coal systems. The plan also calls for development of hydrogen turbines and “megawatt-scale” fuel cells powered by coal; expansion of university-led near-zero-emission research centers on geologic sequestration; support of at least five regional carbon sequestration demonstration projects; and a one-time appropriate request of $300-million to resolve a fossil energy budget shortfall.

Kerry’s proposal also calls for a 66% increase in clean coal technology demonstration funding to $2-billion.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: coal; electric; energy; environment; kerry; kerryenergy; utility
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Kerry is now for coal...never mind his past(19 years)voting history. More Flip-flops from F'n.
1 posted on 08/23/2004 5:44:59 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
Kerry Releases Details of Clean Coal Proposal

"Have the maid wash it." :)

2 posted on 08/23/2004 5:47:22 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

His W. Va poll numbers must be slipping...


3 posted on 08/23/2004 5:47:46 AM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

Will he be importing the coal from Vietnam?


4 posted on 08/23/2004 5:51:34 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
No wonder this guy doesn't want to talk about his record in the senate.
5 posted on 08/23/2004 5:55:37 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
Nobody cares about his plans for 'clean coal'. Everybody wants to know what the deal is with all the Vietnam Vets coming out of the woodwork putting the lying scumbag traitor label on him.

Come on John, Report for Duty already and BRING...IT...ON!
6 posted on 08/23/2004 5:58:28 AM PDT by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Isn't there a bunch of clean coal in Utah?


7 posted on 08/23/2004 5:58:45 AM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

This is a "me too" moment.

President Bush approved this long ago.

http://energy.gov/engine/content.do?PUBLIC_ID=15083&BT_CODE=PR_PRESSRELEASES&TT_CODE=PRESSRELEASE

Note the date: 02/04

February 19, 2004
President Bush's Clean Coal Power Initiative Seeks New Round of Technology Improvement from Industry
Round II Reaffirms Commitment to Reduce Harmful Emissions

WASHINGTON, DC – The Department of Energy (DOE) has released a solicitation for the second round of proposals under President Bush’s Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI). The Department plans to provide approximately $280 million in federal funds for demonstrating barrier-breaking technologies that sharply reduce and ultimately eliminate pollution in coal-based power plants.

“Clean coal is a crucial element of our overall energy policy and our goal of a balanced, diverse energy portfolio that will provide Americans with energy and economic security and continued environmental improvement,” Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham said. “The technologies we seek to foster through Round II will help make it possible for coal to remain a cornerstone of our domestic energy portfolio, particularly for power generation, and to continue that role into the long-term future.”


8 posted on 08/23/2004 5:58:56 AM PDT by OpusatFR (President Bush will win 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

He's trailing in West VA. This is hot air double talk. Can you make sense of he's saying? I sure as heck can't and I doubt coal miners will either.


9 posted on 08/23/2004 6:00:21 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
...Kerry has unveiled a detailed version of his plan to invest $10-billion in clean coal technologies...

He has unveiled a scheme to pi-- away ten billion dollars.

His clever plan involves the manufacture of gigantic Maytag washers.....

10 posted on 08/23/2004 6:00:45 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Great link to Novak:

Kerry also co-sponsors environmentalist Sen. James Jeffords's Clean Power Act, which the coal industry regards as a death sentence in eliminating 90 percent of mercury emissions by 2008. The non-partisan Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates the Jeffords bill would reduce coal consumed for electricity by 43 percent, losing 1 million jobs.

11 posted on 08/23/2004 6:09:09 AM PDT by JennysCool (The Clinton Legacy: Sandy Berger's Pants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

Oh, he will allow RESEARCH and he will force the coal plants to spend billions to upgrade. He just won't allow mining or the building of new powerplants.


12 posted on 08/23/2004 6:23:23 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
Kyoto? What Kyoto? Nothing puts out more C02 per BTU than coal.

In Kerry's favor, there are only two ways in which the U.S. will achieve energy independence in the next decade (that's assuming we pump enough domestic oil to serve our transportation needs). One is to build many nuclear reactors (long term we'll have to import uranium, however). The other is to burn lots of coal. The U.S. is the Saudi Arabia of coal.

13 posted on 08/23/2004 6:26:40 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
If you are indeed a physicist, I'd be interested on your thoughts regarding Conagra's "Turkey Waste" oil maker. I'd doubt this stuff except for the facts that Conagra is putting their own dollars into it and a few folks I work with who have chem eng backgrounds think they may have crack the code.

This may have the potential to mitigate both the oil import and organic waste programs.

14 posted on 08/23/2004 6:52:25 AM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
Everything but generating atomic energy, the most environmentally sound energy generation.
He is fully aware that his friends in France generate 80% of their electricity needs with atomic power.
Delving in future power generating technologies provides good talking points, however we need to get through the next 20 years first.
Go tell us that you want to bring oil imports down by exploring, drilling for oil and gas on the continental shelf. Alaska comes to our mind, offshore resources are there, we have a million barrels of oil per day sitting there waiting to be environmentally acceptably extracted.
A million per day times $40 per barrel is $40 million a day of own resources, or times a full year is... go multiply.
Think of Kerry's futuristic plans when you go to the pump and come to realize that this extortion by oil producers need not be.
Yes and ask yourself which party is catering to interests to block, filibuster, prevent us from utilizing our own resources?
Forget the old democratic interest group excuse that a million barrel of oil is nothing compared to total usage.
It has to be part of a total package that brings us over the next 20 years.
15 posted on 08/23/2004 7:00:24 AM PDT by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meldrim

I do know that Industry has a long history of utilizing waste or byproducts and transforming them into other uses and products that are sold. RE: steel minimills, aluminum mfg byproducts,rubber from tires and plastic waste into new products. Most are created and based on purely economic positives not the Guvernment!


16 posted on 08/23/2004 7:03:40 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
But Clinton made the majority of the best "clean coal" deposits off limits for mining by executive order when he deliberately carved them into the national wilderness preservation act, or whatever he called it. He did this after he got big bucks from the Ryadi's who just happen to own the mineral rights to the other clean coal deposits around the globe.

So in order to run clean coal plants, we will be importing the coal from Indonesia conglomerates while our own resources sit right here in the ground..........

With Kerry in office, Indonesia is poised to become the next Saudi Arabia. How coinkydink?

17 posted on 08/23/2004 7:12:07 AM PDT by blackdog (Hell is an endless hayfield needing to be raked, baled, and put up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

Kerry's proposal is for the blue-blood RATs to get together with the gay RAT caucus and the krinton RATs and work together for energy independance.

They way it works is gay RATs like Barney Franks will obtain secret documents of damaging nature from the underwear of criminal RATs like Sandy Berger. They will then transfer the damaging documents between the @ss cheeks of tight-@ssed RATs like John Kerry where his clenched buttocks will exert the pressure needed to convert the carbon-rich cellulose in the paper into coal. Any excess pressure will produce diamonds which will then be sold for additional campaign funds for RAT candidates.

Simple. Community-based. Sustainable. What more could you want?


18 posted on 08/23/2004 7:14:40 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (I love the smell of Kerry's bullsh*t in the morning. Smells like...victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
More News from the Dems...looks like this was a planned attack.

Democrat wants faster permitting for "clean coal" power plants By MARTHA BRYSON HODEL The Associated Press

19 posted on 08/23/2004 8:07:41 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Meldrim

Tyson Foods is also building one of those plants to recycle their turkey and chicken guts. If all of the rendering plants, solid waste facilities, and yard waste were to be run through this process (which it all can, along with all of the waste tires), we wouldn't need to import any oil. ZERO.


20 posted on 08/23/2004 8:10:50 AM PDT by datura (The Difference Between a Democrat and a Communist Is????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson