Posted on 08/22/2004 3:08:22 PM PDT by Libloather
Kerry won Vietnam vets' wrath describing what he couldn't see
BY HAROLD W. ANDERSEN
Published Sunday, August 22, 2004
WORLD-HERALD CONTRIBUTING EDITOR
It is one of the bigger gambles of the presidential campaign. But with most of the news media looking the other way, John Kerry has been getting away with it so far.
I refer to Kerry's gamble that the news media won't finally take a hard look at his anti-war activities instead of concentrating on his four-plus months of combat-zone experience as a decorated, wounded veteran of the Vietnam War - experience that Kerry incessantly promotes as qualifying him to be president and commander in chief of the armed forces.
There have been occasional, brief news-media references to, but no details of, Kerry's controversial testimony to a U.S. Senate committee. It took place after he opted out of the customary one-year tour of duty under a Navy policy that allowed such an early out if a serviceman so elected after receiving his third Purple Heart.
(The Marines stopped awarding a Purple Heart for a minor wound, even if the Marine received medical treatment. None of Kerry's wounds was serious enough to require hospitalization.)
Let's take a detailed look at Kerry's Capitol Hill testimony. It will, I think, help explain why many Vietnam veterans oppose Kerry's presidential bid.
On April 23, 1971, John Kerry appeared before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, dressed in what appeared to be military fatigues, displaying the ribbons representing his Vietnam War medals (ribbons which he subsequently said he threw over a wire fence onto the Capitol grounds).
Kerry's testimony, widely publicized at the time, included the following allegations, which he offered as facts:
A "Winter Soldier Investigation" (largely financed by actress Jane Fonda) meeting in Detroit a few months earlier heard statements from men who represented themselves to be Vietnam veterans.
Kerry said that "they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam . . . ."
Kerry described such incidents as "crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with a full awareness of officers at all levels of command." Such conduct, he testified, reflected "the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do" and was "accepted policy by many units in South Vietnam."
Kerry's four-plus months of combat-zone experience involved his commanding half a dozen men in a "swift boat" crew as a naval lieutenant, junior grade. Yet, his testimony purported to describe atrocities committed by Army and Marine units serving in the jungles of Vietnam.
"The Army says they never leave their wounded," Kerry said. "The Marines say they never even leave their dead. These men have left all the casualties and retreated behind a pious shield of public rectitude. They've left the real stuff of their reputations bleaching behind them in the sun . . . ."
Is it any wonder that outraged Vietnam veterans have formed organizations like "Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry"?
Kerry could not possibly have seen the things that he repeatedly said "we" had seen. Apparently, he relied on the statements of some of the supposed veterans who attended the "Winter Soldier Investigation" rally in Detroit.
But later research confirmed that in five or more cases, those testifying at the Detroit rally lied about serving in Vietnam and/or about witnessing examples of brutal war crimes.
Enough today about the largely ignored story of John Kerry's testimony to a committee of the U.S. Congress. Next Sunday: the angry reaction of other Vietnam veterans who were as well situated as Kerry, if not better, to know how American forces conducted themselves in the Vietnam War.
You know, I never thought of that voting block- children of Vietnam Vets!
I have heard this sort of thing from friends old enough to know. This information makes me sick. We were so close, only to be thwarted by the leftist swine.
Given the recent drop in veterans planning to vote for Kerry reported in polls, I'd say the Swift boat vets may have already cinched the election for Bush. Kerry's cold reception at the VFW convention wasn't widely reported in the media. Sure the media is trying to trash the vets but the more they publish the more they publicize the inconsistancies in Kerry's bio.
Unbelievable!!! The last line in that propaganda flyer is almost identical to the words Kerry spoke in his testimony....they used his words!
Want to join in the fun? Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!
You know, I never thought of that voting block- children of Vietnam Vets!
Let's hope it filters down. Guess I'll have to talk to my 3 to make sure they haven't been brainwashed.
Tell your Dad he is in good company. Many of us are just like him and we have kids and some have grandkids that have friends and they all are of voting age!
When you talk to your friends remind them of your father's agony over what Kerry did!
Semper Fidelis
It may not be all that significant, but Kerry was abusing the uniform at this time. Medals (or the ribbons representing those medals) are not to be worn on fatigues. They are only worn on Class "A"s or better.
The poor sad sack, Kerry, couldn't even wear his uniform correctly.
Thanks for posting that image, it's invaluable evidence of Kerry's betrayal.
"Looks like we a loosing the fight"
No, we are winning! Kerry is on the defensive. He has not been able to establish any message for the campaign and distance himself from Bush before the GOP convention.
Various posts have indicated (in Iowa for example) that the Democrats are very worried at what they are seeing.
The veteran vote is a crucial vote and if it turns mostly to Bush it will have a decisive impact in these swing States.
Kerry's Anti-War stance and his attack on the Vietnam Vets will bury him once they become the focal point of the discussion.
Kerry reminds me of that old cartoon,Commander Mc Bragg,that's always pushing his exagerated,outlandish war stories off on his butler.
Oh yeah, there is a whole generation of children who saw first hand the results of the Kerrys and Fondas.
It's payback time.... time for us vet children to say loud and clear that what was done to our honorable men who served this Country in vietnam is unacceptable,dishonorable and unforgiveable.
May God hear my prayer that Kerry feel the shame and rejection on election night that he heaped upon our servicemen in his quest for the Whitehouse.
This is what I don't understand - this idiot was America's enemy's best friend. He obtains power in the Senate and found a way to become the RAT party candidate - for Commander-in-Chief? Just how convoluted is THAT?
I was thinking about starting a FR thread for ALL vets and their kids to vent. It's been a long time and the biggest war protester gets an anal exam like no other. I was wondering how that felt to all those who served - and got pissed about what Effin' Kerry did. It must be satisfying in so many ways...
Yes! Start that thread.
My 21 yearold twin sons were just talking with me today. They knew I went to Gainesville to FReep Kerry Krewmate Del Sandusky the other day. They just now realize how personal my feeling are and how Kerry's lies smeared ALL vets.
With a tear running down his face, my one son looked me in the eye and said, "Dad, that Kerry is a sonofabitch for doing that to his fellow comrades. Now I understand why you will fight him with all your might. I will tell ALL of my friends this story".
I felt like he now really does understand his old Marine pops.
I agree! I am posting as fast as my fingers can move. Posting articles I find here and elsewhere. One place, a liberal haven where you don't get banned for posting pro-Bush/anti-Kerry stuff (yet) is here:
http://fray.slate.msn.com/?id=3936&tp=bestoffray
There are other rooms, War Stories, Fighting Words, Politics, etc., that can be found in the Index:
http://fray.slate.msn.com/?id=3936
Getting the word out is helping.
Odd that you would post such pessimistic nonsense on a thread headed by a newspaper article suggesting the exact opposite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.