Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exposed: Scandal of double voters (68% are Democrats)
nydailynews.com ^ | August 21, 2004 | RUSS BUETTNER

Posted on 08/22/2004 10:08:07 AM PDT by Andy from Beaverton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Miss Marple; Howlin; PhiKapMom

Excellent example of media bias while maintaining a fig leaf of 'we criticize both sides', and a resource for the post-Nov. election fights.


61 posted on 08/22/2004 11:30:05 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

BUMP FOR THE SUPPORT OF SWIFT VETS HERE... http://www.swiftvets.com/


62 posted on 08/22/2004 11:32:31 AM PDT by freddiedavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
I'm not so sure the voters are the ones to blame in this instance.

Any voter who willfully votes more than once in an election is certainly to blame for their own crime.

63 posted on 08/22/2004 11:35:26 AM PDT by NautiNurse ("I served in Viet Nam, and we have better hair"----John F'n Kerry campaign platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Capricam

Theresa and the bogus war hero could conceivably get dozens or even hundreds of votes under such a scenario where property ownership entitles one to a vote.

OTOH, I think that only tax paying citizens should have a vote. Why should Government free loaders get to vote on issues which effect the purses of working persons?


64 posted on 08/22/2004 12:36:22 PM PDT by Radix (John Kerry is finally not going to do a 180, especially when it comes to releasing his form 180!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

You mean to tell me that a person with two addresses can cast their vote on election day and send in an absentee ballot and both votes would count? TELL ME IT AIN'T SOOOOOOO,..... OH GAWD...SOMEBODY GET ME A DRINK...QUICKO!


65 posted on 08/22/2004 12:37:40 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jsbankston

Should illegal immigrants get to vote?


66 posted on 08/22/2004 12:53:48 PM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

And what of the electoral college?


67 posted on 08/22/2004 12:56:42 PM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
What of the Electoral College?

How would it be affected, you mean? It wouldn't be any more affected than it already is by people moving, dieing, and being born.

It is still one FEDERAL vote, in a state of legal residency, which presumably, would also be the state-of-record for the census.

The population is always in flux, but reapportionment only occurs every ten years, after the census, so the EC is always slightly out of whack anyway.

If people in these positions either split their vote like we did--wife resident & registered in one state, husband in the other--or switch their legal residency back and forth depending on which issues which year are most important to them, the EC is still out of whack.

Don't think the states involved don't both want tax returns showing ALL income! In our case, we were at least spared part of that by having one residence in a state that does not have a state income tax.

However, property & other taxes applied. So did whacko initiatives by Lefist organizations on everything from anti-guns, to "humane" fishing, to limiting property rights, to legalizing drugs, to 'gay rights'. All of these affect both property values and 'living values'.

Statistically, it would not be enough to matter at the EC level, but would provide fairness at the local level.
68 posted on 08/22/2004 1:36:13 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Unfortunately, this article only says that they "could" vote twice, not that they do. But I still think it has strong spin potential.

In truth, mostly it is probably stupid seniors and students (lib constitutencies) who don't bother to close out their registration in their original home state.


69 posted on 08/22/2004 1:53:25 PM PDT by jojodamofo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
The article ENCOURAGES the practice of double voting by telling how difficult it is to detect (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).

Note the example used is a Republican, signalling Democrats that it's ok to do.

It IS the NY Daily News, after all.

70 posted on 08/22/2004 1:59:45 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jsbankston

You got drivers licences for each location?

How about filing your income taxes.? Paying state taxes to all the states you own property in? Car registrations?


71 posted on 08/22/2004 2:06:23 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jsbankston
Seems to me that as a property owner I should have a voice in each city and each state.

Where you live is where you get your voice. One man, one vote

Anything less will bring back the aristocracy in this country.

72 posted on 08/22/2004 2:06:41 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

I think "students" have been doing this for years. They vote on absentee out of their parents address, and they vote in the college town where they attend school.

I have bitched about this for over 30 years. I cannot get anyone to listen to me, and I personally knew the Registrar of Voters in my county. Sad. Same old story- "Gee--they wouldn't do that, would they? We don't have the money to chase this." I don't think you should be able to "vote" in the town where you attend school. You are only there for a short time, and are usually NOT a property owner. Voting on local issues that don't impact your pocketbook shouldn't be a priviledge for "students".


73 posted on 08/22/2004 2:12:54 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

Jeez, 46,000 New Yorkers got the option to vote twice, but many of our military folks never even got the opportunity to do it once.


74 posted on 08/22/2004 2:46:48 PM PDT by mass55th ( “Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
The News' investigation also found: Of the 46,000 registered in both states, 68% are Democrats, 12% are Republicans and 16% didn't claim a party.

Or, "How the democrats almost stole the election"

75 posted on 08/22/2004 2:49:10 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

Thanks for posting this.

I just e-mailed the original article to the Florida Department of Elections.


76 posted on 08/22/2004 3:07:10 PM PDT by EllaMinnow (swimming through the blogosphere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

bttt


77 posted on 08/22/2004 3:08:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
Florida election officials were widely criticized after the 2000 election for instituting policies that resulted in thousands of African-Americans, who tend to vote Democratic, being turned away at the polls.

I thought that 2000 saw the largest African-American turnout in Florida history.

-PJ

78 posted on 08/22/2004 3:17:37 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

They will be triple votinng this fall and the dead always vote Democrat and vote often.


79 posted on 08/22/2004 3:45:30 PM PDT by KriegerGeist (Lifetime membership of the "Radical-Right-Wing-Kook-Factor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger

bookmark


80 posted on 08/22/2004 5:44:07 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson