Replies

After much searching, I found it...this web site has the electronic version of The New Soldier of course it is without pictures...but it does give insight to the man who wants to be king.

Gorio

1 posted on 08/21/2004 8:32:23 PM PDT by gorio

Here is most all of the text and most of the pictures:

http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/index.php?topic=NewSoldier

2 posted on 08/21/2004 8:36:58 PM PDT by gilliam

To: gorio; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thank you!

Ping tonk! E version of Kerrys forbidden book "The New Soldier"

4 posted on 08/21/2004 9:01:09 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)

hehehe ...

the man who would be king

I loved that film

5 posted on 08/21/2004 9:02:51 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)

8 posted on 08/21/2004 9:07:10 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)

9 posted on 08/21/2004 9:07:17 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Hanoi Jane and Hanoi Kerry sitting in a tree F-R-E-N-C-H-I-N-G)

Freeper N. Theknow says:
"It’s faster than a checkbook, more powerful than a Democratic demagogue, able to lay waste to a liar Kerry with the single click of a mouse. It's a little bird of truth, it's plain to see Kerry's unfit... it's... it's...SuperFReep!

Want to join in the fun? Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!

10 posted on 08/21/2004 9:08:16 PM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)

We will not quickly join those who march on Veterans' Day waving small flags, calling to memory those thousands who died for the "greater glory of the United States." We will not accept the rhetoric. We will not readily join the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars-in fact, we will find it hard to join anything at all and when we do, we will demand relevancy such as other organizations have recently been unable to provide. We will not take solace from the creation of monuments or the naming of parks after a select few of the thousands of dead Americans and Vietnamese. We will not uphold traditions which decorously memorialize that which was base and grim.

11 posted on 08/21/2004 9:08:19 PM PDT by Samwise (John Kerry is a pseudo-French elitist, ketchup-swigging gigolo, wannabe-hero, billionaire doofus.)

It would have been better if they had used a spell checker after they OCR'ed the text out of the book.

But, it's good to have this out there.

12 posted on 08/21/2004 9:09:33 PM PDT by antisocialista (Where Has Mama T gone after the BIG argument last week?)

Funny that the first supposed soldier is named "John Birch"

Coincidence?

13 posted on 08/21/2004 9:12:01 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)

To: gorio; The Sailor; kjfine; Old Sarge; USAF_TSgt; darkwing104; txradioguy; Long Cut; Jet Jaguar; ...

One BOOK that Kerry wants banned, his own! PING

14 posted on 08/21/2004 9:12:34 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Hanoi Jane and Hanoi Kerry sitting in a tree F-R-E-N-C-H-I-N-G)

In our opinion, and from our experience, there is nothing in South Vietnam which could happen that realistically threatens the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia, or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom, which those misfits supposedly abuse, is to us the height of criminal hypocrisy.

One can just imagine what the status of your Republic would be if Ronald Reagan was defeated in 1980 and Carter was the President in the first 4 years of the '80's.

15 posted on 08/21/2004 9:14:38 PM PDT by EGPWS

"and we cannot consider our selves America’s best men when we are ashamed of and hated for what we were called on to do in Southeast Asia."

LOL, not a best man but wants to be President? He seems to have forgotten his shame recently. Didn't he just wrap himself up not just in an American flag, but in a Vietnam-centric American flag, at the convention?

What a hypocrite.

19 posted on 08/21/2004 9:21:14 PM PDT by EaglesUpForever

John Kerry is a socialist.

Why?

He has all any man could want....

Or does he?

He wants POWER! He sees himself as the salve to the wounds of a nation, he desires to be a RIVER to his people.

Why?

POWER

21 posted on 08/21/2004 9:32:34 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)

To: JohnHuang2; MJY1288; mike1sg; mystery-ak

23 posted on 08/21/2004 9:45:21 PM PDT by GretchenM (A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)

To: gorio; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Mia T; JohnHuang2

Honest men can disagree about whether or not Kerry fluffed up his record to get a purple heart, but his testimony before Congress was crystal clear: It's part of the Congressional record and tape recorded for posterity. His actions in testifying before Congress and in leading the VVAW gave great aid and comfort to the enemies of freedom. Only God Almighty knows the entire toll Kerry's actions had on the lives of the men he sold out, and on the innocent people of South Viet Nam who perished. My eyes well up with tears when I consider the years so many of our finest and bravest men suffered from injuries that were inflicted upon them when they were being held as prisoners of war by the enemy emboldened by Kerry's rhetoric. The names on the wall. The ones we will never know. Their blood cries out from the ground. Surely, we can in charity forgive John Kerry for his folly, maybe even excuse his actions because he was "swept up with the times." Maybe. But should this man ever be allowed the honor of serving as the President of the United States of America? Never.

25 posted on 08/21/2004 9:50:22 PM PDT by ppaul

To: gorio; gilliam; mylife

29 posted on 08/21/2004 9:54:36 PM PDT by Fedora

Here is a better transcript of Kerry's remarks before Congress which include his far more interesting remarks during a question and answer period after his set speech, including this bit:

Mr. Kerry: I would like to discuss that.

It is my opinion that the United States is still reacting in very much the 1945 mood and postwar cold-war period when we reacted to the forces which were at work in World War II and came out of it with this paranoia about the Russians and how the world was going to be divided up between the super powers, and the foreign policy of John Foster Dulles which was responsible for the creation of the SEATO treaty, which was, in fact, a direct reaction to this so-called Communist monolith. And I think we are reacting under cold-war precepts which are no longer applicable.

I say that because so long as we have the kind of strike force we have, and I am not party to the secret statistics which you gentlemen have here, but as long as we have the ones which we of the public know we have, I think we have a strike force of such capability and I think we have a strike force simply in our Polaris submarines, in the 62 or some Polaris submarines, which are constantly roaming around under the sea. And I know as a Navy man that underwater detection is the hardest kind in the world, and they have not perfected it, that we have the ability to destroy the human race. Why do we have to, therefore, consider and keep considering threats?

At any time that an actual threat is posed to this country or to the security and freedom I will be one of the first people to pick up a gun and defend it, but right now we are reacting with paranoia to this question of peace and the people taking over the world. I think if we are ever going to get down to the question of dropping those bombs most of us in my generation simply don't want to be alive afterwards because of the kind of world that it would be with mutations and the genetic probabilities of freaks and everything else.

Therefore, I think it is ridiculous to assume we have to play this power game based on total warfare. I think there will be guerilla wars and I think we must have a capability to fight those. And we may have to fight them somewhere based on legitimate threats and that is what I would say to this question of world peace. I think it is bogus, totally artificial. There is no threat. The Communists are not about to take over our McDonald hamburger stands. (Laughter)

Senator, I will say this. I think that politically, historically, the one thing that people try to do, that society is structured on as a whole, is an attempt to satisfy their felt needs, and you can satisfy those needs with almost any kind of political structure, giving it one name or the other. In this name it is democratic; in other it is communism; in others it is benevolent dictatorship. As long as those needs are satisfied, that structure will exist.

But when you start to neglect those needs, people will start to demand a new structure, and that, to me, is the only threat that this country faces now, because we are not responding to the needs and we are not responding to them because we work on these old cold-war precepts and because we have not woken up to realizing what is happening in the United States of America.

32 posted on 08/21/2004 10:03:45 PM PDT by jordan8

From the Epilougue: We will not quickly join those who march on Veteran's Day waving small flags, calling to memory those thousands who died for the "greater glory of the United States." We will not accept rhetoric. We will not readily join the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars-in fact, we will find it hard to join anything at all

Uh, didn't he just give a speech in front of Veterans of Foreign Wars? He won't stoop to join em but he'll take their votes.

36 posted on 08/21/2004 10:22:11 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis (Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)

This is a photo of a POW/ MIA Table. These tables have become routine fair at most military gatherings. This is one of the most unusual one's that I have seen.
I can't help but wonder when I see something like this...how can people like Mr. Kerry possibly use military service as a basis for becoming P.O.T.U.S.? This table is dedicated to the memory of those who never came home. Had John Kerry not had the focus in the 70's would we as a nation been focused on bringing home our POW's?
JMHO

39 posted on 08/21/2004 10:47:49 PM PDT by gorio

Looks like the Amazon.com reviews of this book need FReeping:

New Soldier

The anti-Kerry reviews seem to have been pushed down the list and onto the next page.

40 posted on 08/21/2004 10:56:50 PM PDT by Fedora

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794