Posted on 08/19/2004 9:58:00 AM PDT by formercalifornian
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Army general violated Pentagon rules by failing to properly clear speeches in which he described the war on terror as a Christian battle against Satan and should be punished, according to an inspector general's report obtained by Reuters on Wednesday.
The Department of Defense's watchdog agency said Lt. Gen. William Boykin, a top-ranking intelligence officer, used official data in some of the 23 religious-oriented speeches he gave after January 2002 which should have been cleared.
Boykin touched off a firestorm last October after giving speeches while in uniform in which he referred to the war on terror as a battle with Satan and said America had been targeted "because we're a Christian nation." He said later he was not anti-Islam or any other religion.
Boykin was obliged to clear the speeches, given "the sensitive nature of his remarks concerning U.S. policy and the likelihood that he would be perceived by his audiences as a DOD spokesman based on his official position and his appearance in uniform," the report said.
Boykin, an evangelical Christian, violated other rules by failing to issue a required disclaimer at the speeches that he was not representing official Pentagon policy, it said.
He also failed to report his receipt of one travel payment exceeding $260 from a non-government source, said the report, which was submitted to the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The report said Boykin did make "good faith efforts" to consult legal advisers about his speaking activities and that should be considered when the Army Secretary assessed the seriousness of the violations.
"We recommend that the Acting Secretary of the Army take appropriate corrective action with respect to Lt. Gen. Boykin," the report said.
The investigation did not focus on whether the substance of Boykin's remarks was appropriate for a senior Pentagon official or whether it compromised his fitness for performing his duties.
A Pentagon spokeswoman had no comment on the report, or what type of punishment the general would face. "That report has not been released. At this point it would be inappropriate for me to comment," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Jane Campbell.
Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American Islamic Relations welcomed the report's findings but said they came too late to prevent damage to the image of the United States and the U.S. military in the Muslim world.
He said his group supported Boykin's right to free speech, but not his speeches while in uniform.
"He's free to have views on Islam that are objectionable. We don't like it, but he has that right, just not as a representative of the U.S. military," Hooper said.
Muslim groups and U.S. lawmakers condemned Boykin's comments when they were reported last fall and President Bush said the remarks "didn't reflect my opinion."
At the time, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld praised Boykin's "outstanding record" and refused to reprimand the general, who played a role in a 1993 clash with Somali warlords and the ill-fated hostage rescue attempt in Iran in 1980.
Since then, Muslim groups also raised questions about what role Boykin, deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, may have played in creating U.S. military interrogation policy amid a scandal over the abuse of prisoners in Iraq.
Boykin issued a written apology last October to anyone offended by his remarks, but did not take any of them back.
If so, you might get a write-up.
How insensitive.......
Nor should he. Let girly men be saddened.
So long as you're not in the Army, and not going outside Army regulations in saying it, you're OK.
If an atheist had said that Muslims attacked America because we are an atheist nation, would a violation have occured? Or is this one of those Christian-only rules?
How do you say " Pound Sand" in Arabic?
If he had done so wearing the uniform of the United States Army, without issuing "a required disclaimer at the speeches that he was not representing official Pentagon policy," and forgetting his "oblig(ation) to clear the speeches," then yes a violation would have occured.
I don't see anything here to indicate that it's a Christian-only rule or that he's being singled out for his views. Quite the contrary, the report quotes his "outstanding record" and refuses to reprimand him. But the DOD wants to have some measure of control over what you say publicly while in uniform. Especially a general.
If you have information that similar remarks from atheist, Jewish or Islamic generals were ignored, then I'd like to know. Until then, this action seems proper to me.
"Islam is a lie from the gates of hell."
How insensitive of you!
In the future please say:
Islam is a filthy lie from the gates of hell.
No.
ISLAM IS A LIE FROM THE GATES OF HELL!!
That was out loud
The sentence: Two more weeks of diversity training.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.