Not even when kerry's been using Vietnam as a primary theme establishing his qualifications?
It's merely my own personal opinion that attacking Senator Kerry *personally* for his actions while in uniform 3+ decades ago is a bit much. Other opinions will obviously and fairly differ with mine.
Pointing out his anti-war activities after he returned from combat is still a legitiamte target, in my mind, however.
But it's the man's Senate voting/attendance record in the last 20 years that makes the case against him as far as I'm concerned.
Your mileage may vary. Hey, it's a free country!
5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires