Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google bans Christian ad: Anti-homosexual remarks considered 'hate' content
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, August 17, 2004 | By Ron Strom

Posted on 08/16/2004 11:22:23 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 08/16/2004 11:23:08 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Tuesday, August 17, 2004



INTERNET NEWS
Google bans Christian ad
Anti-homosexual remarks considered 'hate' content

Posted: August 17, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Ron Strom


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com


Google has banned a Christian organization's advertisements promoting its stance against homosexuality, saying the group promotes "hate."

Stand to Reason, a nonprofit apologetics organization, says its "AdWord" advertisement on Google recently was pulled down. Specific AdWord ads are listed in the right-hand margin of search results on the popular site when key words an advertiser submits match with those put in by a Net user. A company promoting hats, for example, could have their site displayed when a user searches for information about hats.

Melinda Penner, director of operations for Stand to Reason, says the organization placed four ads on Google. Three of the ads remain on the system, but one leading Net surfers to a Q&A about same-sex marriage was taken down after running for two or three weeks.

"Google's objections had to do with other articles on our website pertaining to homosexuality," Penner told WND. "They claimed that their specialist had deemed us a hate site and that their policies didn't allow people to have ads that discriminated against certain groups, which include sexual orientation."

Penner said she asked Google what specifically it thought was "hate speech."

"The things they cited were all moral judgments from our religious perspective about homosexuality, that it's wrong," she explained.

"The irony is that in one of the articles they cited, we have an admonition that one of our moral perspective is that we treat homosexuals respectfully and kindly."

The Stand to Reason website has a special page with articles on homosexuality issues.

Penner says she has asked Google for its definition of "hate," saying Stand to Reason's positions are not hateful based on dictionary definitions.

When it comes to "discrimination," she says, it is actually Google that is discriminating by disallowing Stand to Reason's ads.

An e-mail Penner received from "Kristie" at Google used the "H" word, saying, "Google AdWords policy never permits ads or keywords promoting hate, violence, or crimes toward any organization, person or group protected by law," including those distinguished by their "sexual orientation/gender identity."

Penner countered via e-mail: "Your suspension of our advertisement illegitimately excludes one side of the [same-sex marriage] debate. If you deem the issue itself off limits, then consistency would require you to suspend all searches of the issue. Instead, your search criteria return links to sites strongly advocating same-sex marriage. …"

Kristie responded by reiterating the company's verdict that the Stand to Reason website includes "unacceptable content." In the same e-mail, she said, "Google believes strongly in freedom of expression. We therefore offer broad access to content across the Web without censoring results. Please note that the decisions we make concerning advertising in no way affect the search results we deliver."

Penner noted that Google, which is in the midst of an IPO, or Initial Public Offering of stock, takes pride in its company motto: "Don't be evil."

"If that's your company motto then there must be some things that you don't want to do," she told WND, "and if your definition of 'hate' is calling something 'evil,' then aren't you a hate group?"

According to Penner, no anti-homosexuality ads currently are coming up in the right-hand ads; they are all pro-homosexual.

"I'm sure there must be some homosexual advocacy groups behind this," she said.

Penner says she contacted a religious legal group and was told because Google is a private organization, there is really no legal action that can be taken.

The other three Stand to Reason ads that are still running on Google have to do with evolution, Christian apologetics and abortion.

Though the organization's pro-life ad is still running on Google, another advertiser's pro-life ad was removed.

In June, Google took down pro-life T-shirt ads a clothing company, Run2316, had run for a time in 2003 without a problem, the firm's operations administrator, Christopher Clay, says.

In an e-mail to Clay, Google said, "At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain 'religion and abortion or contraceptive content.' As noted in our advertising terms and conditions, we reserve the right to exercise editorial discretion when it comes to the advertising we accept on our site."

Clay believes Google's IPO has caused the company to clamp down on advertising it finds distasteful. Google might begin trading its stocks as early as tomorrow on Nasdaq, according to news reports.

A spokesman from Google was reluctant to go on the record with WND either about the specific instances mentioned or the company's "hate speech" policy.

He explained that the company does not allow advertising from organizations that speak negatively of a so-called "protected group."

The spokesman would not talk about the pro-life issue or the reason one group's pro-life ad might be acceptable and another group's ad would not.

Google's online guidelines for AdWord advertisers say nothing about homosexuality or protected classes of people. It does have, however, include a prohibition against advertising for casinos.

So is Google becoming more aggressive combating "hate speech" to coordinate with its IPO? Since the company is in a "quiet period" in conjunction with the public offering, the spokesman could not address the issue.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ads; antichristian; boycott; boycottgoogle; celebrateperversity; christianity; christians; culturewar; google; homosexualagenda; itsjustsex; lavendermafia; liberals; religion; religiousintolerance; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2004 11:22:23 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Google is controlled by Silicon Valley liberals. That may be the reason why it insists on being the Internet's Thought Police.


2 posted on 08/16/2004 11:24:03 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Freedom of Speech for liberals only.


3 posted on 08/16/2004 11:27:43 PM PDT by sully777 (Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
In an e-mail to Clay, Google said, "At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain 'religion and abortion or contraceptive content.' As noted in our advertising terms and conditions, we reserve the right to exercise editorial discretion when it comes to the advertising we accept on our site."

Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING

But porn ads on the sidebar are perfectly acceptable to Google and potential investors.

4 posted on 08/16/2004 11:38:34 PM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

We at Free Republic should constantly hammer away at the liberal slant of Google, and their cousin Yahoo.


5 posted on 08/16/2004 11:47:54 PM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee

yahoo or altavista bump!


6 posted on 08/16/2004 11:54:03 PM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Google never learns because it sees no reason to:
Google Applies Double Standard to Political Vendors
7 posted on 08/16/2004 11:59:43 PM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Binghamton_native

google is under attack from yahoo.
I mean AT EACH OTHER'S throats

search engines are like mafias.
payola and listing scams.

always have been.
as long as they are privately owned websites, we can't tell them what to list or not.

internet websites can list or not list whoever they choose.
Google is going down.


8 posted on 08/17/2004 12:00:16 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Kristie responded by reiterating the company's verdict that the Stand to Reason website includes "unacceptable content." In the same e-mail, she said, "Google believes strongly in freedom of expression. We therefore offer broad access to content across the Web without censoring results. Please note that the decisions we make concerning advertising in no way affect the search results we deliver."

Translation from LiberalSpeak: We are censoring results and restricting access.

9 posted on 08/17/2004 4:59:51 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Read John Kerry's new book: Mein Kampuchea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sully777

Google does believe in freedom of speech. One is free to speak about anything Google allows. (/sarcasm)


10 posted on 08/17/2004 5:33:15 AM PDT by Mikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Oh well, time to find another default search engine.


11 posted on 08/17/2004 6:00:37 AM PDT by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

so if the homosexuals pressure google to make real information about the destruction of homosexuality unfindable then it is the same as censorship.


The new book burning.

web shunning.


12 posted on 08/17/2004 6:19:34 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Just what google wants to hear with their IPO.

can anyone say "internet bubble"

google is next.


13 posted on 08/17/2004 6:21:49 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow

Ping


14 posted on 08/17/2004 7:12:39 AM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Yep pretty stoo-pid IMO.

It was bad enough when they banned Paid Gun Ad links on the right side of their page. THAT took me some time to get over, but now this...

Guess it's back to Yahoo.

15 posted on 08/17/2004 7:38:17 AM PDT by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: scripter; little jeremiah

Bump


16 posted on 08/17/2004 8:25:36 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; EdReform; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ..

- Homosexual Agenda PING -

Not surprising, considering the increased levels of persecution that Christians have, are, and will continue to, suffer at the hands of a secular, morally 'flexible' society.

I fully expect to see more and more of this in the coming days, weeks, months, and years.


17 posted on 08/17/2004 9:46:16 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow (God doesn't call the qualified - He qualifies the called.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

"Christian is hate" ping


18 posted on 08/17/2004 10:01:21 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"The irony is that in one of the articles they cited, we have an admonition that one of our moral perspective is that we treat homosexuals respectfully and kindly."

Doesn't matter. According to the queer radicals and their media allies, the only way to treat them with respect is to swallow and regurgitate their rhetoric. Everyone who disagrees with them and their agenda is a "homophobe," a "bigot," and is guilty of "spreading hatred."

To illustrate this, please read an essay I wrote in June 1999: "I Won't Hate Homosexuals No Matter How Much The Media Wants Me To."

The same forces that ganged up on Exodus International back then are at it again -- GLAAD criticized the Los Angeles Times for running another Exodus ad a few weeks ago, and a Times columnist suggested that the former homosexual featured in the ad was really just "a personals ad," and that he was hoping to get offers to bring him back to their side.

19 posted on 08/17/2004 10:23:09 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (When it comes to newborns getting stabbed in the head, Kerry cares...about drowning hamsters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Google is evil:

"...no anti-homosexuality ads currently are coming up in the right-hand ads; they are all pro-homosexual."

How is it that all liberals love homosexuality? And anything that tells the truth about homosexuality is considered blasphemy?

Could it be that the very foundation of liberalist/leftist thought is rebellion against the natural order? That they want to destroy what makes human civilization human? What is their ideal world?


20 posted on 08/17/2004 10:24:07 AM PDT by little jeremiah (I am a proud pervertophile-phobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson