Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limits sought on Border Patrol
Washington Times ^ | 8/17/04 | Jerry Seper

Posted on 08/16/2004 10:57:00 PM PDT by kattracks

The Department of Homeland Security wants to restrict the U.S. Border Patrol's arrest of illegal aliens in the nation's interior, concerned that the recent apprehension of 450 illegals by agents in inland areas of Southern California failed to consider the "sensitivities" of those detained.
    According to department sources, a formal written policy under review would limit Border Patrol arrests to areas along the nation's 7,000 miles of international border and give U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the responsibility for enforcing immigration laws in the nation's interior.
    But ICE officials have acknowledged that it has neither the manpower nor the resources to carry out an extensive interior-enforcement program. Between 8 million and 12 million illegal aliens are thought to be in the United States.
    ICE has only 2,300 agents committed to interior-enforcement efforts, and they concentrate on finding the 80,000 criminal aliens on the nation's streets and 320,000 foreign nationals known as "absconders," who fled after being ordered deported.
    In recent weeks, ICE supervisors also have been asked to "closely scrutinize all expenditures and curtail spending to the maximum extent possible."
    Under the pending policy, according to the sources, Homeland Security would restrict the Border Patrol to the arrest of illegal aliens traveling north from the border, others at border highway checkpoints and illegals at transportation centers, such as international airports.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bice; borderpatrol; dhs; immigrantlist; immigration; jerryseper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2004 10:57:01 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Sabertooth

We need to write our Congresscritters again...


2 posted on 08/16/2004 10:58:33 PM PDT by GeronL (Viking Kitties have won the GOLD MEDAL in the 2,000 meter ZOTTING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
concerned that the recent apprehension of 450 illegals by agents in inland areas of Southern California failed to consider the "sensitivities" of those detained.who employ illegals.

The Cheap Labor wing of the GOP strikes again!

There's a fungus among us.

3 posted on 08/16/2004 10:59:22 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Dreier; Too bad, he used to be a good guy. Now he's a good example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA

Ridge and Asa should both be fired!!!!


4 posted on 08/16/2004 11:03:51 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Bush administration is floating into a state of maximum denial and silence on this issue. What annoys me most is the lack of candor in the Bush administration as to the real choices and options this nation must grapple with on the illegal immigration issue. Dammit, the Bush administration is not engaged and AWOL on this issue. Bush need not become nativist to become engaged. What he does need to become, is a bit more explicit in defending his policies and why and in detail. This beyond the curtain stuff is craven and disgusting. And I don't think political realities cut it. Americans are looking for intelligent non nativist leadership on this issue, and so far, nobody is providing it of any import - it is the null set, nada.
5 posted on 08/16/2004 11:04:48 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"that in the future, Homeland Security would enforce immigration laws "in a reasonable manner" and would consider the "sensitivities" surrounding the enforcement of those laws in its interior-enforcement program." "sensitivities"!!!! How can the Bush campaign go after Kerry for his "more sensitive War on Terror" speech and consider the "sensitivities" of illegal aliens?
6 posted on 08/16/2004 11:10:38 PM PDT by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

And how will those "sensitivities" save you and me and our fellow citizens from crimes and terrorism committed by aliens?


7 posted on 08/16/2004 11:14:39 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Your homeboys are on vacation, so you'll have to call their instate numbers. We can call the Whitehouse, however:

202-45202-456-1111

Homeland Security: dhs.gov

They think we're all sitting on the beach sipping Mai Tais. Time to let them know we're watching every move they make and we'll vote accordingly.


8 posted on 08/16/2004 11:19:26 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Did you see Condi Rice on O'Reilly a few days ago? It was ridiculous. He repeatedly asked her about the borders (what with terrorists coming over, and all); and posited his well-known opinion that there should be military guarding this area.

She gave some lame answer about not wanting to shut down "trade." WHO is talking about shutting down "trade?" What she really means, but will not say, is that they don't want to shut down the "trade" of cheap labor.

Unfortunately for them, the American people are starting to realize that this foolish "cheap" labor is simply being subsidized by the taxpayers. We may need some, but they've thrown the doors open wide. They've also thrown the doors wide open to the drug trade, and terrorists. They all make me sick (BOTH parties); AND they might yet get another few thousand of us killed in their little "deal with the devil."

9 posted on 08/16/2004 11:19:58 PM PDT by garandgal (Lord; please let our country survive the "worthless generation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
ANY restriction on the number of arrested illegals is unacceptable.

Is it any wonder Homeland "Security" is regarded as a joke?

10 posted on 08/16/2004 11:22:25 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Yeah! Them guys are real sensitive about their prayer beads. DHS really needs to get on the sensitive taining. (Got any chillin to donate to the body count?) P.S. Do NOT fold, spindle, or mutilate your IBM card!! Seriesly!!


11 posted on 08/16/2004 11:23:36 PM PDT by Waco (z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garandgal

We may need some, but they've thrown the doors open wide.

We don't need them at all. There are plenty of people out of work, including jobs for high school kids and college students that can't find work. There is enough legal immigrants to fill in for the rest.

They're costing us a fortune in taxes and giving us nothing but headaches in return. Enough is enough. I'm tired of subsidizing the campaign donor's cheap labor.


12 posted on 08/16/2004 11:24:14 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

ping


13 posted on 08/16/2004 11:35:20 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

202-45202-456-1111

ACK! I don't know how I messed up those numbers so badly, but I did. Let's try it again:

202-456-6213 and 202-456-1111 for the Whitehouse Comment Line.

dhs.gov is for Homeland Security! Let 'em have it.


14 posted on 08/16/2004 11:35:37 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
They're costing us a fortune in taxes and giving us nothing but headaches in return. Enough is enough. I'm tired of subsidizing the campaign donor's cheap labor.

Oh, I agree with you. The thing that FINALLY has people (in areas other than the already-overtaken West Coast) noticing it is the schools. Hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars going to educate children of illegals, at the expense of the quality of education for our own children, has finally hit home.

Perfect example: Our "rag of record" prints about one sob story per week about some poor "immigrant" family that may be deported. This week's example was a family that has been living here for about six years. They dragged all of their children here with them (so none are fictional citizens). This family alone has cost over $120,000 in taxpayer dollars for educational expense. I'm sure that the "fine" employer has another dozen illegals on his payroll. This employer should be in the Fed Pen for theft.

15 posted on 08/16/2004 11:42:52 PM PDT by garandgal (Lord; please let our country survive the "worthless generation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Bingo! Give that guy a lit taco. ;-)


16 posted on 08/16/2004 11:47:28 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

ICE is controlled by legacy Customs. From what I have seen so far, ICE has little interest in app'ing illegal aliens. If legacy Customs can get a good haul in money and property they will do an illegal alien operation. If there are 10 illegals simply standing on the street corner in the interior of the US you can forget about it, ICE isn't interested. Of course, some of us will go against policy and arrest illegals anywhere.


17 posted on 08/16/2004 11:56:18 PM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin

Oh, crap


18 posted on 08/16/2004 11:57:19 PM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

It's a crying shame bump.


Hoppy


19 posted on 08/17/2004 12:04:50 AM PDT by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Homeland Security - isn't.


20 posted on 08/17/2004 12:18:56 AM PDT by searchandrecovery (Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson