Posted on 08/16/2004 4:38:59 PM PDT by QQQQQ
Moreover, he said, the patents cover stored digital streaming media not just on the Internet but also over cable and satellite networks."
Theses must be some patents!
Wasn't adoption of the V-Chip mandated by law? Did they ever donate to Al Gore?
Oh, this is too damn easy. Insert your own Al Gore joke here.
Butt Al Gore invented the internet.
Patents on software are the most damaging single thing to the software industry. When software was "not patentable", there was tremendous growth. Now, stagnation is beginning.
The fact of the matter is that many people have many great ideas which, for various reasons, they do not turn into a usable product. In many cases, it would be clear and obvious to many people that X would be a great idea if Y were possible. Figuring out how to do Y is a real breakthrough. Unfortunately, it's often possible for someone who has no clue how to do Y to patent the idea of doing X. Such a person can then reap the rewards if someone else figures out how to do Y.
The stagnation is a result of many factors, but I'd tend to blame the emergence of spyware and spam as being just as significant as software patents. Much of the stuff that made computing great was developed in an era where it was reasonable to download some new program from some unknown author and try it out. Today, such a policy would border on insanity.
What about the patent on writing letters of the alphabet or numerals side-by-side instead of all on top of each other? To say nothing of the patent on writing a blank space, and using that blank space as a separator between words or numbers. As fundamental as Micro$oft's patent on 0's and 1's.
Imagine me getting a bill from this clown and telling him to shove it up his ***
Let's nuke'em from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.....
The problem with all overly broad patents is prior art.
All it takes is one example and the court will though the patent out and you are left with a huge legal bill. Only the lawyers profit from dumb patents.
These patents will go down the same way. What is'nt covered by prior art is obvious (which is not patentable, but is subjective). The real problem is the patent office will let a kid patent swinging sideways if the forms are filled out properly (which happened, his dad is a patent lawyer out to prove a point).
They probably have more lawyers than employees!
Acacia Research-Acacia Technologies
500 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: (949) 480-8300
Email: info@acaciares.com
Web Site: http://www.acaciaresearch.com/
DETAILS |
|
SOURCE: Yahoo! Finance |
Does anyone have the exact quote on Al Gore's Internet creating claim? Somebody wrote to our local paper saying that Al Gore only said he passed federal guidelines and blah-blahs to allow the Internet to be what it is today.
AT&T had videophone in what, 1964? Doug Engelbart's amazing demo where he tied in live video over remote links in real time to a computer occurred in ... 1968 .
IBM, AT&T, Philips all have huge patent portfolios. They can crush these guys at will.
Someone patented the idea of field-stripping a Glock, inserting a live round into the chamber, and re-assembling it so as to allow the firearm to be carried with a round in the chamber but the striker not cocked; making the weapon for use thus only requires pulling the slide back about 1/4".
I have no idea why this guy patented that, or what he could possibly do with the patent, but the patent was granted nonetheless.
All it takes is one example and the court will throw the patent out and you are left with a huge legal bill.
Another group of lawyers that needs to be crushed.
Patent barratry at work for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.