Skip to comments.
Kerry: I Wouldn't Respond to Nuclear Attack
Newsmax ^
| 8/13/04
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 08/13/2004 7:04:03 AM PDT by truthandlife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
![](http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20040228/i/r1633574988.jpg)
![](http://www.greencis.net/~dianeleigh/bushpilots.jpg)
...And who are the American people going to elect?
To: truthandlife
Kerry: I Wouldn't Respond to Nuclear Attack
Another bass ackwards response.
2
posted on
08/13/2004 7:05:48 AM PDT
by
Lady GOP
To: truthandlife
If there was a Nuclear attack on US soil, the American people would demand a response no matter who was president.
3
posted on
08/13/2004 7:06:31 AM PDT
by
Babsig
(This stay home mom is dangerous!)
To: truthandlife
To: truthandlife
Honestly, the headline is ridiculous considering what is in the article ... but I hope a lot of undecideds see it and skip over the article.
To: Lady GOP
The Chinese are probably getting their missiles ready as we speak (more accurate thanks to Clinton) and contributing cash to the DNC.
6
posted on
08/13/2004 7:08:44 AM PDT
by
muslims=borg
(No WMD's ?- Tell that to the Kurds.)
To: Babsig
Kerry WOULD respond. He would attack any state that
supported the GOP with nukes to protect his Islamic and French allies.
7
posted on
08/13/2004 7:09:51 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Re: Protection from up on high, Keyser Sose has nothing on Sandy Berger, the DNC Burglar)
To: truthandlife
The headline and the article don't add up.
Another Newsmax prize-winning hit piece.
8
posted on
08/13/2004 7:10:50 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(This tagline was censored by freerepublic.com!)
To: jojodamofo
9
posted on
08/13/2004 7:11:14 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: truthandlife
WOW! Is that instructive as to Kerry's mindset or what? He's one of the nuclear-freeze wackos.
What would he do if a suitcase nuke was lit off in an American city and the culprit could be tied to a particular country? Respond with sensitivity and understanding?
To: Constitution Day
No, completely believable.
11
posted on
08/13/2004 7:14:03 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: truthandlife
The leftist media had best hurry up and ignore this.
To: jojodamofo
Come on, it associates Dukasis with Kerry it can't be all that bad. Besides it's newsmax.
13
posted on
08/13/2004 7:14:34 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: truthandlife
He would go to the UN and ask them to take care of it. I cannot believe this POS!
14
posted on
08/13/2004 7:14:47 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
To: lodwick; Cuttnhorse; operation clinton cleanup; Servant of the 9; catpuppy; null and void; ...
But as Michael Dukakis' Lieutenant Governor, Kerry authored an executive order that said the state of Massachussetts would refuse to take part in any civil defense efforts in response to a nuclear attack on America. It comes down to .. who do you trust with your life
Sen Kerry or President Bush
I'll take President Bush any day
15
posted on
08/13/2004 7:16:09 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Kerry & Edwards .... they will leave no Special Interest Group behind)
To: truthandlife
I'm sure if Al Qaeda detonates a nuclear weapon in an American city, John F*ckin's excuse for not saving American lives is we can't prevent a nuclear attack. Well, he wouldn't defend us from the Soviets. He wouldn't defend us from terrorists today.
16
posted on
08/13/2004 7:16:24 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: truthandlife
If America was to have another 9/11 attack, Kerry would immediately demand the UN host a PEACE conference whereby all the grievances of the terrorist would be aired (at the US Taxpayers expense of course). Next he would turn around and
APOLOGIZE for all the evils that America has done to the poor Muslim/Arab world for allowing Israel to exist.
Also, he would impose a $900 Billion tax on Americans in order to pay for Reparations to dis-enfranchised muslims who has suffered emotional damages for having to endure seeing and hearing about America's involvement in the middle-east.
John Edward's and his lawyer friends will of course be handling the behind-the-scenes legal wranglings for the usual 40% fee; but of course this is 'Totally Legal' because there is 'No Legal Authority' in these matters.
17
posted on
08/13/2004 7:16:35 AM PDT
by
prophetic
(Dems investigate for pre 9/11intel - but now we've LOTS of Intel and they claim politics)
To: truthandlife
Kerry is squeamishly weak!
18
posted on
08/13/2004 7:17:08 AM PDT
by
Vision Thing
(Vegas, Beeber, Vegas!)
To: Neville72
Kerry is looking for Utopia. Not much of a realist. Get rid of all bad things and the way to do it is "say it should be done".
We'll always have war. We'll always have poverty. We'll always have unemployment. Problems don't go away, only their intensity changes.
Fortunately, the majority of us are optimists doing what we should be doing!!
19
posted on
08/13/2004 7:17:53 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: truthandlife
I think he would respond. Unfortunately his response would be to crap his pants and cry.
20
posted on
08/13/2004 7:18:18 AM PDT
by
MP5
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson