Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Abortion Ads Will Be Illegal (What First Amendment?)
Fox News ^ | Wednesday, August 11, 2004

Posted on 08/12/2004 12:45:07 AM PDT by nickcarraway

CHICAGO — The anti-abortion group Wisconsin Right to Life) is airing a TV spot and radio ads about blocked judicial nominees aimed at Wisconsin Democratic Sens. Russ Feingold and Herbert Kohl.

But come this weekend, the ad campaign will be illegal because of whom it's targeting.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: abortion; activism; ads; campaignfinance; cfr; feingold; firstammendment; freespeech; kohl; politics; prolife; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2004 12:45:08 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

We'll have all kinds of free speech, if we talk into a closet and keep our voices down.


2 posted on 08/12/2004 1:02:28 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Why watch sitcoms? Just listen to Rush talk about left wing wackos and surf the FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; nickcarraway; NYer; Mr. Silverback; 4ConservativeJustices
Free speech for me, but not for thee.

I suppose that's S.O.P. in our nation's courtrooms today.

Robert Bork-Supreme Court Chief Justice, Emeritus.

We can all dream, can't we?

-good times, G.J.P. (Jr.)

3 posted on 08/12/2004 1:48:18 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("Sit Ubu. Sit. "(Woof!) "Good dog. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Good grief. I suppose they could bleep out the names to make it legal... As a byproduct, such would lay bare the idiocy of these CFR laws.


4 posted on 08/12/2004 1:49:53 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
Senator Mitch McConnell:

(Adjusts glasses. Hangdog facial expression.)

I don't wanna say it, but I told you...

5 posted on 08/12/2004 2:02:29 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("Sit Ubu. Sit. "(Woof!) "Good dog. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So much for political free speech. Meanwhile, I suppose pornography is legal before, during, and after the election.


6 posted on 08/12/2004 3:03:50 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It's time to test the Constitutionality of McCain-Feingold.


7 posted on 08/12/2004 3:13:08 AM PDT by Equality 7-2521
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like it's time to challenge McCain-Feingold which has done zero, nothing, nada to "fix" the problem of "special interest money" in WA.


8 posted on 08/12/2004 3:48:55 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Bill Jones will be *lucky* to get 33% of the vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Equality 7-2521

It already has been tested, and it passed.

Thanks President Bush, for taking away our free speech right.

(Yes, it's HIS fault, as he SIGNED it. The law would be NOWHERE without his signature)


9 posted on 08/12/2004 5:13:31 AM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

It's been challenged.

It's here to stay, until it is repealed (which will never happen).


10 posted on 08/12/2004 5:15:56 AM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo

Yup. Bush screwed us on this one. And himself.


11 posted on 08/12/2004 5:16:56 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Big time.

Bush has no one to blame but himself if he loses.


12 posted on 08/12/2004 5:26:33 AM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Don't you just love what campaign finance reform has done to our country? Congress passed it and George W. Bush signed it.


13 posted on 08/12/2004 6:08:04 AM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender ("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo

Oh but don't worry. The Supreme Court will certainly overturn it. Bush is taking the argument away from the Democrats. < /sarcasm >


14 posted on 08/12/2004 6:13:24 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

That certainly was the argument.

4 years, no vetoes. None.


15 posted on 08/12/2004 6:30:48 AM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; ...

ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

16 posted on 08/12/2004 6:33:11 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Don't miss your chance to be a goon: Freepmail me to get on your state's KerryTrack Ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd_Amendment_Defender

From the article: "Feingold's campaign manager, George Aldrich, said the campaign is a "gimmick designed to score political points during an election by an organization that has endorsed all three of our potential Republican opponents."

Of course, yes, that's why it must be banned. God forbid someone campaign against us.


17 posted on 08/12/2004 6:34:12 AM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
So much for political free speech. Meanwhile, I suppose pornography is legal before, during, and after the election.

Good point. Up is down and square is round.

18 posted on 08/12/2004 6:43:15 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Scourge of Yazid
I suppose that's S.O.P. in our nation's courtrooms today.

Dims and the media have free speech - not conservatives. I'd take Bork for Chief any day of the week.

[muppets]
Yorn desh born, der ritt de gitt der gue,
Orn desh, dee born desh, de umn bork! bork! bork!

19 posted on 08/12/2004 8:45:26 AM PDT by 4CJ (||) Men die by the calendar, but nations die by their character. - John Armor, 5 Jun 2004 (||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

The purpose of the campaign finance law was not to restrict the intrusion of big money into political campaigns. That was how it was advertised, but the real purpose was to make it harder for average folks to have a voice in elections.

McCain-Feingold created a huge 527 loophole to allow millionaires and billionaires like George Soros to continue to pump money into our elections. The people who are restricted are groups of pro-lifers or other average folks who get together and take up funds ($15 or $20 contributions) to buy ads.

McCain-Feingold likely caused the GOP to lose the recent special election in South Dakota. Leftist pro-abortion Democrat Stephanie Herseth won the race 51% to 49%. In the past, local pro-lifers would have run ads close to the election exposing her pro-abortion liberalism, but they were barred from doing so this year for the 60 days prior to the election.

This law will likely cost the GOP candidate three or four percent of the vote in many races, since it will be almost impossible to expose liberal candidates' voting records without committing a federal crime under this law.

And it's only the beginning. Now that the Supreme Court has set a precedent by ruling that free speech can be restricted if such speech upsets certain politicians, you can be sure the leftist 'Rats and their McCain-type suck-ups will move to restrict speech even more.

Scalia was right. McCain-Feingold is the beginning of the end for free political speech in America, just as surely as the Texas sodomy case was the beginning of the drive to force homosexuality into every corner of our society.


20 posted on 08/12/2004 9:06:06 AM PDT by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson