Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British politicians singled out by bin Laden's assassination squads
The Times ^ | August 12, 2004 | Zahid Hussain and Daniel McGrory

Posted on 08/11/2004 4:45:44 PM PDT by MadIvan

Al-QAEDA hit teams are planning to assassinate British politicians and other international leaders closely linked with President Bush. These targeted killings would be carried out simultaneously in a number of countries.

Terror suspects being held in Pakistan have told their captors that the orders for this campaign of political assassinations came directly from Osama bin Laden.

Key al-Qaeda lieutenants now in custody have revealed how in his mountain hideout bin Laden is still personally involved in drawing up plans for a new wave of attacks against the West.

A Pakistani intelligence source said last night: “Osama has given the go-ahead to target important places and personalities in the US, UK and Pakistan.”

Details of the assassination plot were said to have been found on a computer belonging to an al-Qaeda suspect who was a frequent visitor to Britain. It suggests that the assassins are in place in many of the countries being targeted by the terror network.

The computer belonging to Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan also contains meticulous details of how suicide bombers will hit airports and buildings in Britain and America.

A senior security source in Islamabad told The Times that there are a number of countries where assassins are intending to strike. There are no names of specific British politicians on al-Qaeda’s list, which just refers to “political personalities” who are key allies of Washington.

The intercepted plans show how this assassination campaign would begin in the US, with the murder of a figure close to the White House followed as swiftly as possible by attacks against as many of America’s allies as the terrorists can reach.

Terror cells were told months ago to identify “available targets” who would exclude closely guarded figures such as George W. Bush and Tony Blair, and instead concentrate on prominent public figures who do not have the same protection.

Pakistani officials have apparently shared details of their discovery with countries vulnerable to attack. These are believed to include Yemen, Turkey and Saudi Arabia as well as Pakistan. President Musharraf of Pakistan has already escaped two attempts on his life this year.

Checkpoints were set up in Islamabad yesterday and cabinet ministers have been told to restrict their movements.

Investigators in Saudi Arabia are said to have uncovered plans by an al-Qaeda cell in the kingdom which was plotting to assassinate members of the ruling royal family.

Security around Saudi royals has been intensifed after this threat was uncovered in June after the killing of the al-Qaeda leader in a shoot-out in the kingdom. Until now al-Qaeda has rarely used targeted political assassinations as a tactic.

Two terrorists posing as journalists murdered the Afghan leader, Ahmed Shas Massoud, 48 hours before the September 11, 2001, attacks in the US to eliminate a key Northern Alliance commander who would have led any attack on al-Qaeda and its Taleban allies.

Pakistani officials refused to divulge whether the plans they have found reveal whether these assassinations will be carried out by gunmen or suicide bombers.

The senior source said suspects told how they are timed to coincide with this November’s US presidential election.

A Tanzanian-born suspect, Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, apparently told his captors al-Qaeda “wanted to create chaotic conditions in the US during the elections”.

“They planned a series of terrorist activities in the United States,” the source in Islamabad said.

Pakistani ministers played down a report from unnamed US intelligence sources quoted in yesterday’s Washington Times claiming that these high-profile assassinations would trigger a new wave of suicide attacks.

Security experts believe that al-Qaeda would have kept cells of suicide bombers well apart from their assassination squads so as not to jeopardise these operations.

Western intelligence officials who have seen the information found on al-Qaeda computers are astonished at the detail compiled by terrorist reconnaissance teams.

They believe targets in Britain have already been carefully chosen as al-Qaeda teams are now known to spend years finessing their attack plans.

What has also emerged from the recent arrests in Pakistan is how Osama bin Laden is determined to carry out another spectacular attack against the US. Mr Ghailani admitting meeting the al-Qaeda leader in 2002 and told them he last had direct contact with bin Laden in June 2003.

Bin Laden last released a taped message in April. The CIA believes the audiotape was the voice of bin Laden and that his mention of the March 11 Madrid train bombings shows the tape was current.

Mr Ghailani, who has been indicted for his part in the 1998 bombings of US embassies in east Africa, told how he was in Pakistan’s South Waziristan tribal area in June when an offensive was launched against foreign militants.

He managed to escape and moved to Gujarat, 110 miles south-east of Islamabad, where he claims to have been training suicide bombers for an attack on a military airbase at Chaklala, which is used by President Musharraf, and Islamabad international airport.

Mr Ghailani reportedly identified one of al-Qaeda’s main figures in Britain, who he said was co-ordinating suicide attacks in Britain and the US.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedauk; assassinationplot; binladen; targets; uk
I am hopeful the Prime Minister is taking sufficient precautions. It's good we found out, however.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 08/11/2004 4:45:47 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: agrace; lightingguy; EggsAckley; dinasour; AngloSaxon; Dont Mention the War; KangarooJacqui; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 08/11/2004 4:46:06 PM PDT by MadIvan (Gothic. Freaky. Conservative. - http://www.rightgoths.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

First I've read of simultaneous assassination attempts. Criminey.

Prairie


3 posted on 08/11/2004 4:49:00 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (sKerry is a sKunk!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I hope the Brits watch the Queen,,I just love her and would die if they got her. and William. They can ignore Charles for all I care.


4 posted on 08/11/2004 4:49:27 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

The proper response would be, "Fine, try it . . . we'll send assassins to kill your whole extended family. And they will not fail."


5 posted on 08/11/2004 4:49:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

... threats are exxagerated... political fear-mongering... a Bush plot... yadayada... boom


6 posted on 08/11/2004 4:51:01 PM PDT by Lexington Green (Warriors or Lawyers? - Victory or Surrender? - The US or The UN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mr Ghailani admitting meeting the al-Qaeda leader in 2002 and told them he last had direct contact with bin Laden in June 2003.

I just hope that we didn't get that little tidbit of information by making the guy prance nekid with a dog collar held by a female US soldier. [/sarcasim]

7 posted on 08/11/2004 4:52:55 PM PDT by narby (Kerry: I was actually in Cambodia, before I was near it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Their goal of disrupting the US election and the recent bust of a planned attempt on someone connected to Musharraff are two recent news items that might be seen as lending credence to this here.
8 posted on 08/11/2004 4:53:53 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

If they succeeded in killing a Whitehouse Government person:
They no not what fury this SLEEPING GIANT can deliver.


9 posted on 08/11/2004 4:57:02 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan
Okay, Ivan!

Let me try this again

I posted the original before I finished writing it.

I'm keeping Prime Minister Blair and all who hold public office in Great Britian in my prayers.

11 posted on 08/11/2004 5:16:48 PM PDT by Pippin (RE-ELECT BUSH/CHENEY............PLEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
YIKES!

But at least we know about this. Forewarned IS forearmed.

12 posted on 08/11/2004 5:35:00 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle George
They know not what fury this SLEEPING GIANT can deliver.

Yes, they know not. But we know not whether the Demonrats would go along with delivery of the devastating blows (collateral damage be damned) to terrorist-harboring countries that assassinations of our leaders would justify. This is not the America of 1941, united as one behind Roosevelt as far as the war effort was concerned. The War on Terror has been totally politicized by the left. I see no reason to expect this to change no matter how much the war is escalated. Lust for power, not national defense, is what motivates the American left in the War on Terror.

13 posted on 08/11/2004 5:39:05 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Leftists don't acknowledge that Reagan won the cold war because they rooted for the other side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

These buggers better not harm a hair of my beloved Tony's head. And that goes double for my beloved W.


14 posted on 08/11/2004 6:24:51 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
The War on Terror has been totally politicized by the left. I see no reason to expect this to change no matter how much the war is escalated. Lust for power, not national defense, is what motivates the American left in the War on Terror.

I agree, and unfortunately, I see no way out for us.

15 posted on 08/11/2004 6:34:13 PM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Just think, folks: Dan Rather could find Osama to interview him, but refused to reveal where he found him. I would love to nominate dear DAN for a treason charge. Does anyone think the Brits will go after him if anything happens to one of theirs?


16 posted on 08/11/2004 7:44:45 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan

But yet no where in this article does it say clinton, the man who was obsessed with getting bin laden.......... I guess he wasn't considered that much of a threat to raghead.


18 posted on 08/11/2004 11:56:33 PM PDT by longfellow (You're either with US or from Hollywood! Ultimateamerican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

"I hope the Brits watch the Queen,,I just love her and would die if they got her. and William. They can ignore Charles for all I care."

If you truly are a Cajun Girl, you must know about Bre'r Rabbit.

"Please don't kill Prince Charles, he's our favorite! Anything but that please!"


19 posted on 08/12/2004 12:57:46 AM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: walford

Hahah,,,


20 posted on 08/12/2004 7:07:19 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson