Skip to comments.
Judge grants Democrats' request to block election results(MO Dems Gear Up For Voter Fraud)
St. Louis Post Dispatch AP ^
| 8/11/04
| Kelly Wiese
Posted on 08/11/2004 3:53:52 PM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash
A federal judge temporarily blocked certification of Missouri's primary election results in federal and statewide races Wednesday and set a hearing for next week on whether to count the ballots of some people who voted at the wrong polling places.
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Cue Carpenters Music: 'We've only just begun......'
To: Clintons Are White Trash
This is a PRIMARY ELECTION. Were any RAT primaries even close or is this just a dress rehersal for the GENERAL ELECTION?
2
posted on
08/11/2004 3:57:24 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: Clintons Are White Trash
The article fails to mention how many votes are disputed and whether allowing those votes could make any difference in this election.
To: Clintons Are White Trash
This would haveto make sense in MO, cause it don't make no sense here. Aren't the individuals who cast provisional ballots by-and-large Dem voters anyhoo?
To: Clintons Are White Trash
Who says we don't need some turnover on our benches?? I am astounded at the perversion of the people's will by black robed jackasses all over this nation.
5
posted on
08/11/2004 3:59:20 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Vigilanteman
My guess is that the number of disputed votes is insignificant, would make no difference in the election, and that this is a harrassment lawsuit intended to create the impression that "Republicans are trying to disenfranchise Black voters."
To: Recovering_Democrat
Who says we don't need some turnover on our benches?? I am astounded at the perversion of the people's will by black robed jackasses all over this nation.The US is a judgocracy now.
7
posted on
08/11/2004 4:01:00 PM PDT
by
Maceman
(Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
To: Clintons Are White Trash
Isn't Missouri the "Show Me State"?
What are they hiding?
8
posted on
08/11/2004 4:02:54 PM PDT
by
Zyke
To: Clintons Are White Trash
Does this have any bearing on the marriage amendment vote?
9
posted on
08/11/2004 4:03:37 PM PDT
by
Huber
(Kerry/Edwards = "Tax 'em & Sue 'em" . Vote Bush/Cheney '04)
To: Steve_Seattle
It also gives the dems precedent when challenging other elections in the future
To: Clintons Are White Trash
Does this have to do with the Marriage bill?
11
posted on
08/11/2004 4:05:41 PM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(Liberals - The Other White Meat.)
To: Missouri
12
posted on
08/11/2004 4:08:17 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(John Kerry- "A Hamster Tale..")
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Steve_Seattle
My guess is that the number of disputed votes is insignificant, would make no difference in the election, and that this is a harrassment lawsuit intended to create the impression that "Republicans are trying to disenfranchise Black voters."
Probably this, but they could also be trying to get some sort of ruling that will also effect the general election in their favor. You know, requiring urban voting places to be open longer etc.
14
posted on
08/11/2004 4:12:46 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: Clintons Are White Trash
This is getting a little scary. The new approach seems to be "if you don't like the outcome of an election, find a judge who agrees with you". Gore started this with the 2000 election in Florida. I really hoped the SCOTUS would have abstained from making any decision at all based on the Separation of Powers, even though I agreed with the outcome. The courts flatly do not have the jurisdiction to second guess elections, under any guise. That's what happened when Bob Dornan challenged massive voter fraud in California. I didn't like that result but was relieved to see the courts unwilling to decide elections. That's all changing now, though.
15
posted on
08/11/2004 4:13:34 PM PDT
by
Spok
To: Clintons Are White Trash
So, here's how they're going to try to cheat. They will have "mobile voters" voting in multiple precincts, signing under false names, probably. And they hope to force the states to count these fraudulent votes through the federal judiciary.
16
posted on
08/11/2004 4:14:43 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: Vigilanteman
That's just how they run elections, under any circumstances. They don't go out of their way to commit fraud, that is their way.
17
posted on
08/11/2004 4:14:58 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(I question the timing of this post)
To: Clintons Are White Trash
I think this is the beginning of a smear campaign against Matt Blunt.
The dems would HATE to see a repub/conservative gov in Missouri.
18
posted on
08/11/2004 4:16:48 PM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Clintons Are White Trash
Making news about this sells the idea to the public that Democrats are being systematically disenfranchised.
19
posted on
08/11/2004 4:18:08 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: 1stMarylandRegiment; 47carollann; A Citizen Reporter; A Cyrenian; adrian; AFLoggie; Air Assault; ...
Ping to keep an eye on this.
20
posted on
08/11/2004 4:19:12 PM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson