Posted on 08/10/2004 7:35:02 PM PDT by Gorilla44
NEXT TIME John Kerry accuses President Bush of misleading the American people, remember Mary Ann Knowles.
Knowles is the Hudson woman whose battle with breast cancer Kerry has turned into a campaign anecdote. Here is what Kerry said about Knowles during his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention on July 29:
What does it mean when Mary Ann Knowles, a woman with breast cancer I met in New Hampshire, had to keep working day after day right through her chemotherapy, no matter how sick she felt, because she was terrified of losing her familys health insurance? America can do better. And help is on the way.
What it means is that John Kerry is fibbing. As Union Leader correspondent Scott Brooks reported on Sunday, Mary Ann Knowles did not have to work through her chemotherapy for fear of losing her health insurance. Employed by Elderhostel, the Boston-based non-profit travel organization for people 55 and older, Mary Ann had 26 weeks of paid disability at her disposal. More was available for a long-term illness. She did not have to work through her chemotherapy. She chose to.
Knowles would have lost some income had she taken the disability leave, said her husband, who is unemployed. But she would not have lost her health insurance, as Kerry has repeatedly misstated.
Asked if the Kerry campaign bothered to get the details of Knowles personal story, spokeswoman Judy Reardon said Kerrys use of the words every day in describing Knowles story was a colloquialism. She went on: When a woman has a mastectomy and goes through therapy, I dont need to double-check on her.
In other words, Kerry knowingly used the words every day when he did not mean every day, and he used the phrase: she still has to go to work every day just to hang on to their health insurance when she did not have to work every day and was in no danger of losing her health insurance.
In short, he lied. Repeatedly.
With all that has come to light about Kerrys voting record and his Vietnam service, his misrepresentation of Marry Ann Knowles story should surprise few. Kerry cannot even get his own personal history straight, so how can we expect him to correctly relay someone elses?
Obama essentially said the same things I've been saying all these years, which that is; I'm sick and tired of a "hypenated America", we're all Americans, first and foremost.
BTTT
ping !!
He's gambling that he will be able to find another 10% too detached from reality or too gullible to see through his smokescreen and that of a compliant media. God help this Republic if he does.
Nice that someone bothered to get the story out, but it won't matter a bit to the America haters.
He wishes to capitalize on Pres. Bush and his successful turning around the economy (a la Clinton) and the successful prosecution of the war, including the transformation of the military.
What better way to Make America Stronger than have someone get the rewards for someone else's vision?
The lies from Kerry just keep on coming, don't they?
I wish we'd kept a list of all his lies and could document them in the New York Times although the leftists are so unprincipled they probably wouldn't care that "their" guy is a malignant narcissist and a liar of the first order.
The things, you say
Your purple prose just gives you away
The things, you say
You're unbelievable
This works nicely with my tagline - thanks!
"Do you know who I am?"
Last night, I was going over that same thing with two undecided voters in the laundry room at the hotel I'm staying at. The woman said she was concerned because of Bush's record on immigration and the whole Iraq thing was a disaster. I set her straight on Iraq. And I agree with her on immigration. I think Bush blew it there. Then I asked her if she voted in 2000, and if so, did she vote mainstrem. She said she voted for Bush. But only because she didn't like Gore's lying. I told her that Gore had in almost everything he said a kernel of truth. And that kernel in most cases would have been impressive enough to win over some voters. Instead, he took that and made it into a lie. I asked her what she knew most about Kerry. She didn't know much. He is a Senator and he was in Vietnam and won a bunch of medals.
I asked her if it was right for someone to be in Vietnam for 4 months and win 5 medals. One of them for shooting an unarmed combatant in the back. One of them for getting a small splinter that was removed with tweezers and bandaged with a band-aid. A SINGLE band-aid. She was VERY unimpressed with him at that point. So, then I asked her if she knew that Kerry got up and testified before congress about the Vietnam war. She didn't. I told her what he said and then I told her that my uncle was spit upon and called a baby killer because of Kerry. Also, the leaders in Vietnam said that they were on the brink of surrender but held on because of John Kerry.
Then I told her that one of his seminal moments was the point where he was on a secret mission to Cambodia on Christmas day in 1968 and he heard on the radio that President Nixon was giving a speech in which he denied that any Americans were in Cambodia. And how he began to distrust the war at that point to the point that when he came back, he protested it. She said that made sense. I then asked her why someone behind enemy lines, supposedly on a mission would be listening to the radio, instead of paying attention to the mission? Also, if he was there, then why in several of his quotes over the years did he say he actually was in a city more than 50 miles away from enemy lines? Also, why did he say that it was Nixon's speech on Christmas Eve in 1968 that turned his life around, when Nixon didn't take office until 1969.
When I got there, she was either voting Kerry or not voting. When I left, she was voting Bush.
Paul
Third-party partisan who hates Kerry for personal reasons.
From SNL 2000 Bush / Gore debates
"Why are all modern Democrat Presidential nominees pathological liars?"
I believe the words you're looking for are....
"Why are all modern Liar Party Presidential nominees patholgical liars?"
Paul
Yes! I like the idea of promoting "ownership" of our health insurance policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.