Posted on 08/10/2004 9:22:10 AM PDT by rene_fonck
About a week ago I got done reading Michele Milkin's new book about the Japanese internments and about how the nation's saftey should come first. Civil Liberties are not as important as public safety. Forget what that dumb liberal Ben Franklin said! WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR NATION FROM TERRORISTS! ITS BETTER WE OFFEND SOME TWIT BY SENDING HIM INTO AN INTERNMENT CAMP AND HAVE HIS CITIZEN SHIP REVOKED THAN TO ALLOW ANOTHER SEPTEMBER 11th TO HAPPEN!
Well I agree with Michele and I agree we need to rise up to the occasion right away and get rid of the rag heads and either deport them or intern them till the war ends. But lately I've been thinking that we could take even further advantage of this situation and use the war as an excuse to impose conservatism on Americans. We should classify liberals as terrorists and convince the American public using worldnetdaily, Newsmax, Rush Limbaugh and all the media outlets we own, (which praise the lord is like uh... all of them!) and convince everyone that Liberals are causing us to lose the war and that pacifists, human rights activists and other anti conservative groups that we disagree with. Then we can incite everyone to lynch them and we can throw them into internment camps. It's just like Herman Goering said in Nuremburg about how you can take over by villifying your opponents and what not. But who cares! Your either on our side or your on the terrorists side!
Being a conservative means alot more than this however, we should also note that conservative also means CHRISTIAN! I remember hearing a sermon by Noah Horsely on DU about General Boykin and how he said it was a war on Satan VS God. He quoted the Bible saying those who are not for me are against me. SO! IF YOUR NOT A CHRISTIAN! YOUR A TERRORIST! AMEN! I like that! Now we can use this to restore our Christian heretige and force the world to convert at gunpoint! ALRIGHT!
To make sure we stay in power I suggest we also find a few more enemies to call terrorists. After we kill all the Muslims lets say that people who whwere green socks and smoke GPC's are terrorists and that people who cant spell or people who like roast chicken and duck sauce are the axis of evil! THIS IS BETTER THAN 1984! WHOO HOO! WE ARE GONNA BE AT WAR AND RULING FOR A LOOOOONG TIME! WERE NEVER GONNA LET THOSE LIBERALS OUT!
SO WHAT ARE YOU WAITING! FOR! CMON! FREEPERS! LETS START SPREADING THE WORD SO WE CAN GET RID OF JOHN KERRY AND RELECT BUSH!
buh bye
prepare for zottage fool
Well, apparently you didn't read the book then, you dumbass. We didn't revoke citizenships - some people chose to give up the american part of their dual citizenship, though, and once they did they became foreign nationals subject to relocation and/or internment.
Flipping through the pages does not mean one has read the book. You actually have to look at the words on the page, and comprehend them.
Wow you displayed your ignorance in a mere 8 words.
Only 18 minutes and I STILL missed the party. Dammit.
Paul Rene Fonck (1894-1953) was the Allies' most successful fighter pilot of World War One, and also the highest-scoring survivor of the war (second only to Manfred von Richthofen).
Fonck was conscripted into the French Army in 1914 and attended Flying School the following February. During the early stages of the war he flew with a French reconnaissance unit before transferring in time to the more active fighter service. He claimed his first 'kill' (a German aircraft on the Western Front) on 6 August 1916.
A brilliant shooter rather than an accomplished pilot (and reputed for his conservative use of ammunition), Fonck claimed no fewer than six victories in a single day, all German aircraft on 9 May 1918 over Montdidier (a feat he was later to repeat).
His tally by the close of the war, 75, made him not only the highest scoring French and Allied ace, but also the most successful fighter pilot to survive the war. Never an especially modest man, Fonck personally claimed to have downed some 127 aircraft - at least - during his service.
In addition to innumerable French honours Fonck was also the recipient of the British Military Cross and DCM.
Following the armistice Fonck worked as a racing and demonstration pilot. From 1937-39 he acted as Inspector of fighter aviation within the French Air Force. However his later record of working with the Vichy government following the fall of France in June 1940 later besmirched his reputation.
He died in 1953.
He even has a French name. Time for le ZOT!
Rene Fonck was a World War One fighter ace. Fonck was reportedly as obnoxious, just like this troll.
I smell ozone...........
Just get released from the mental institution, did you?
Please...I beg you...if you're going to post inanities like this one, proofread first. Your spelling and grammatical errors are painful to read and they actually make me feel pity for you.
Fresh troll! Get it while it's still twitching!
René.....sounds like a girl's name. < snicker >
It isn't 'alot' it's 'a lot' (2 words)
Sorry, pet peeve of mine. But this whole thing is like the bottom of a birdcage that hasn't been changed in a month.
It worries me that a chunk of America is crazy like you.
Maybe we should lock y'all up? Oops, my bad, did I say that out loud?
You used my own worst pet peeve, "saftey" and THAT is why you have been zotted.
Thanks for playing, come again soon.
Drat, I missed a ZOT!
Tell us, is that tack, like in tacking up a wanted poster, or tack, like in sailing a dingy in the Bay of Pigs?
bye bye drooling troll. You are another reason why we must support our Swift Boat Vets to counter the bs from your side.
"Donate to the Swift boat vets to counter the tie in with the mediots and Kerry.
Why we should contribute to the Swift Boat Money raising for tv ads, based on comments from Kerri's staff"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1188521/posts
According to a Kerry campaign source, senior campaign advisers tasked two Washington-based campaign staffers to vet the recently published Unfit for Command.
"The purpose was to compare what that book had with what we had on file from Senator Kerry," says the campaign source, who said that the research project developed more than 75 instances where Kerry's recollections, previous remarks, or writings conflicted with the book's reporting.
"We took some of the most glaring examples, like the Christmas in Cambodia story, and presented them to senior staff, and we assume that those things were put in front of Senator Kerry," says the source. "We haven't heard a word about it. All we were told is that it was being taken care of."
The campaign source said that the book was not considered a "serious" problem for the campaign, because, "the media wouldn't have the nerve to come at us with this kind of stuff," says the source.
"The senior staff believes the media is committed to seeing us win this thing, and that the convention inoculated us from these kinds of stories. The senior guys really think we don't have a problem here."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.