Posted on 08/09/2004 12:06:15 AM PDT by scripter
Remember those "cutest couple" votes in high school? It was always some super-jock paired with the perennially perky cheerleader. Well, if same-sex marriage is legalized, the new winners will probably be two super-jocks, Josh and Matt, who've been going out since seventh grade.
Dating will become a whole new game.
Josh and Matt will probably garner the sympathy vote because they lost out at homecoming to "queen" and "queen" Megan and Katie, both bisexuals. It won't bother these girls to parade arm in arm across the football field. They'll be attracted to each other anyway, after hooking up at several parties. Three other members of the homecoming court will be transvestites.
Football will become, of course, a co-ed sport. The law allowing same-sex marriage will prompt the school board – after consultation with the well-heeled American Civil Liberties Union – to open up all sports to both sexes in the name of gender non-discrimination. This year's starting quarterback will be Heather, now 17 and 5'10," having been raised by her two mommies who cheer proudly from the sidelines. Heather's been taking hormone injections since she was 10 when her mothers, in consultation with medical experts, decided she was a guy born into a girl's body.
The team has a new, cooperative attitude since Jim, the football coach of 20 years who took the team to numerous state championships, was fired when he shouted at one of the new female players. The discrimination suit against him may cripple him financially for life, but sacrifice is part of the cost of revolution. The school is interviewing several possible candidates as his replacement, among them two lesbians.
Such will be the climate in high schools in the new America, where boys will not be allowed to be boys unless the school's attorneys say it doesn't violate the newly-discerned "rights" of someone else. With same-sex dating an accepted fact of life, homophobia will be defined as even a raised eyebrow of objection to the new regime. So open, aggressive ogling and come-ons will be the daily locker-room life of every boy who takes gym. But many guys will adjust after sitting through countless hours of classroom indoctrination about how sex and gender are just biological accidents that savvy humans can mold and shape however we want.
For those girls who aren't trying to grow beards and get tax-funded mastectomies in middle school, many will grow up having comfortably experimented with lesbian sex at sleepovers or at camp, often as early as nine or 10. After all, between girls there's no worry about pregnancy, and new research published by the American Psychological Association will surely determine that, in order for children to identify their orientation, "sex play" needs to begin around puberty. Many girls will have a whole array of girlfriends with whom they've had sexual contact by the time they are 13 or 14.
Likewise, boys who "liked" each other at age eight may have healthy sexual encounters together, aided by porn videos that the American Library Association sued to make available in every library. To deny this would be to discriminate against the expression of their orientation and "normal" same-sex dating behaviors. With no sexually transmitted diseases in the young and innocent, public-health experts can see no reason why parents shouldn't allow this mutual masturbation as a healthy outlet. Just because a camp counselor may often watch them doesn't mean there's anything wrong with him, either. He may have valuable advice to give them as a fully adjusted "gay" man.
When Josh and Matt began seeing each other as a couple in middle school, it took some time for their parents to realize it's OK for them to spend the night together in Matt's bedroom. After all, dating is different for same-sex couples. They know how to be "safe" together. Another guy couple they know – Kyle and Brian – will break up when 15-year-old Brian begins to date a 25-year-old neighbor.
That will be OK once age-of-consent laws for same-sex relationships are eliminated. After all, when pregnancy isn't an issue, there's no risk as long as "safe" gay sex is practiced, a subject which will consume considerable more time in health education classes. It would be discriminatory to deny someone the opportunity to engage in customary courtship behavior, just as people have down through the ages. And for same-sex couples to date, age shouldn't be a barrier. After all, no one picks who they fall in "love" with. Fortunately, there will be enlightened judges who'll see the rationale here.
Like other public schools, rumor will have it that there was a mass exodus from this high school after the legalization of same-sex marriage. The figure will be as high as 50 percent in some districts. However, such actions would be pointless, since the Supreme Court will soon rule that only faiths that don't preach "hate" qualify for constitutional protection, tax-free status or school charters. So religious schools and home-schoolers will have to demonstrate that tolerance teaching has been absorbed adequately and that these students' homes don't foster homophobia.
Of course, a few loose ends still need to be tied up. Adam, a 29-year-old young man dying of AIDS, attended this high school. It was at a meeting of the school's gay-straight alliance club years ago that he met Stuart, an older man who was the openly homosexual guest speaker. A sexual relationship began without the knowledge of Adam's parents. Adam was 15 at the time, and Stuart was HIV positive. Stuart died several years ago. Adam has since left homosexuality, but could not leave the consequences. The school had been advised by the National Education Association and other powerful groups not to tell him or any other student that many people leave homosexuality, so Adam was ignorant about this option.
The lawsuit Adam will file against the school and its board members, individually and collectively, will probably go nowhere. No judge will believe him when he says he was never homosexual in the first place and that none of this needed to happen. After all, everyone knows homosexuals are born that way and no young person can be seduced into the lifestyle.
The latest statistics will show that 40 percent of the population is "gay," lesbian, bisexual or transgendered. And we all know that statistics don't lie.
Agreed. If you listen to some FReepers, you'd think the entire world was in danger of turning gay. Well, at least then we would all have well-decorated houses and good taste in clothes.
Apparently you haven't read anything that Scripter and/or EdReform post, or clicked their links, or read any of the Homosexual Agenda archives.
It's a lot deeper than you think. What about all the pro-homosexual teaching in schools? It's happening as we speak. What about the "Day of Silence" and special "gay" counselors advising adolescents about their sexual orientation? What about clubs with homosexual advisors? Etc.
What about the "hate crimes" laws? Teddy Kennedy is perennially attempting to make sexual orientation added to the federal hate crimes law. You think beating up a homosexual should have a heavier punishment than someone beating up your or my old father?
Gay activists are drooling with anticipation, hoping to get "hatespeech" laws on the books, as they are in Sweden, Canada and other places.
You like restrictions on free speech? Or freedom of association? You like forced "sensitivity" (iow- gay friendly) training for various jobs? Or in CA, for foster parents. Mandatory.
You ought to read some stuff, you will see that it is a very serious threat to freedom.
Why not address some of the serious points Scripter and EdReform make? People like you who tacitly support the gay agenda by saying it doesn't exist don't really make any points in the debate.
What do you think about the state mandated law in CA (since 2001) which require all public schools, grades K-12, to have pro-"gay" cirriculum? I live here, I've read about it. It's real, not fiction. What do you think? Do you think Planned Parenthood and others should by law come into every classroom and promote homosexuality to LITTLE kids as normal and natural, and make fun of and denounce anyone who thinks differently?
That's what is actually happening.
The author makes it sound as though there are legions of males throughout America chomping at the bit for same-sex marriage to be legalized so they can, uh...start being gay, I guess.
I'm sure gay groups have an agenda, but I'm not really concerned that they'll 'turn' a significant amount of Americans gay. Even if they do, so what? If people want to engage homosexual sex, what do I care?
What do you think about the state mandated law in CA (since 2001) which require all public schools, grades K-12, to have pro-"gay" cirriculum? I live here, I've read about it. It's real, not fiction. What do you think? Do you think Planned Parenthood and others should by law come into every classroom and promote homosexuality to LITTLE kids as normal and natural, and make fun of and denounce anyone who thinks differently?
We conservatives are always talking about "states rights" and how local government is best suited to deal with things like social issues.
Well, it looks like the good people of the Golden State, through their elected representatives, have made a decision that this is the type of curriculum they want in their schools. People in California can get the law changed, send their kids to private school, they can home school or they can leave the state if they don't like what's being taught.
Yup. Thank goodness that I got married (to a woman) before same-sex marriage became legal or I would have run off to Massachusetts with my hair dresser </sarcasm
There is no end, only a gradual decay.
Watch out for traffic.
This destroys both the biological and political arguments for and against the distinction of homosexuality per se and all contracts will thenceforth be "gender-neutral."
Exactly. And now the sodomites are using the federal laws (14th ammendment) to cram gay marriage down our throats because they managed to corrupt one court in massachusettes.
If they want to all move somewhere where they can practice their perversion away from us (such as sweden) then they are free to go. They cannot force us to accept their behavior (and that is all it is, just a chosen behavior) and have access to our children. The people of the US will never accept sodomites as being mentally healthy.
Unfortunately we now come to the point of having to seek a federal protection from a state issue because one state was corrupted.
OK, so how is the Mass. "gay" marriage judicial decision a peoples' choice? One judge gets to invent a new kind of "marriage" that has never been seen before in the history of the world, that a large majority of Americans do not want?
One more question, if you would be so kind.
Do you consider same sex acts to be normal, natural and morally benign? Or the opposite?
And what's your viewpoint on the fact (and it is a fact) that the rate of child molestation is much higher among homosexuals? Since that is true, then more homosexuals means more child molestation. That's ok with you?
OK, so how is the Mass. "gay" marriage judicial decision a peoples' choice? One judge gets to invent a new kind of "marriage" that has never been seen before in the history of the world, that a large majority of Americans do not want?
Is this what you call states' rights?
I call it totalitarianism by leftist judges.
Do you consider same sex acts to be normal, natural and morally benign? Or the opposite?
And what's your viewpoint on the fact (and it is a fact) that the rate of child molestation is much higher among homosexuals? Since that is true, then more homosexuals means more child molestation. That's ok with you? Or are you one of these "children's rights" people who thinks that children have the right to sexual expression?
Funny that your "conservative" views exactly mirror liefts' - on this issue.
Sorry for the almost duplicate. Computer is being even worse than usual.
Note - are you being purposely obtuse?
It's the KIDS that are prone to being seduced/molested into homosexuality. But apparently you don't see anything wrong with that.
LOL. Well, taste varies I guess. If the "Queer Eye" crew showed up at my house, I'd turn out the lights and be as quiet as possible.
Please, fill us in on the details. This should be interesting.
I suppose you're referring to Title VII. It does not prohibit men's sports. That is result of schools responding to a well-intentioned but misguided government regulation. The law of unintended consequences in effect.
"Little Johnny, you can't really know if you're gay or straight until you try both ways. Your 'special friend' Billy wants to try, don't you? Just be sure to use a good lubricant, like we showed you hear in class."
I weep for my nation.
You don't speak for all of America, I assure you. And I can equally assure you that some people in America see your rhetoric as fundamentalist, hate-filled demogogeury and consider that a sign of mental illness.
Not that I'm saying that. But some would.
You're right. I only speak for about 70% (as shown by the latest Missouri polls which are the most recent)
So in the general sense in which it was originally intended (and which is conmmon English usage). The people of the US will never accept sodomy as normal
You're right. I only speak for about 70% (as shown by the latest Missouri polls which are the most recent)
So in the general sense in which it was originally intended (and which is common English usage). The people of the US will never accept sodomy as normal
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.