Posted on 08/09/2004 12:06:15 AM PDT by scripter
Remember those "cutest couple" votes in high school? It was always some super-jock paired with the perennially perky cheerleader. Well, if same-sex marriage is legalized, the new winners will probably be two super-jocks, Josh and Matt, who've been going out since seventh grade.
Dating will become a whole new game.
Josh and Matt will probably garner the sympathy vote because they lost out at homecoming to "queen" and "queen" Megan and Katie, both bisexuals. It won't bother these girls to parade arm in arm across the football field. They'll be attracted to each other anyway, after hooking up at several parties. Three other members of the homecoming court will be transvestites.
Football will become, of course, a co-ed sport. The law allowing same-sex marriage will prompt the school board – after consultation with the well-heeled American Civil Liberties Union – to open up all sports to both sexes in the name of gender non-discrimination. This year's starting quarterback will be Heather, now 17 and 5'10," having been raised by her two mommies who cheer proudly from the sidelines. Heather's been taking hormone injections since she was 10 when her mothers, in consultation with medical experts, decided she was a guy born into a girl's body.
The team has a new, cooperative attitude since Jim, the football coach of 20 years who took the team to numerous state championships, was fired when he shouted at one of the new female players. The discrimination suit against him may cripple him financially for life, but sacrifice is part of the cost of revolution. The school is interviewing several possible candidates as his replacement, among them two lesbians.
Such will be the climate in high schools in the new America, where boys will not be allowed to be boys unless the school's attorneys say it doesn't violate the newly-discerned "rights" of someone else. With same-sex dating an accepted fact of life, homophobia will be defined as even a raised eyebrow of objection to the new regime. So open, aggressive ogling and come-ons will be the daily locker-room life of every boy who takes gym. But many guys will adjust after sitting through countless hours of classroom indoctrination about how sex and gender are just biological accidents that savvy humans can mold and shape however we want.
For those girls who aren't trying to grow beards and get tax-funded mastectomies in middle school, many will grow up having comfortably experimented with lesbian sex at sleepovers or at camp, often as early as nine or 10. After all, between girls there's no worry about pregnancy, and new research published by the American Psychological Association will surely determine that, in order for children to identify their orientation, "sex play" needs to begin around puberty. Many girls will have a whole array of girlfriends with whom they've had sexual contact by the time they are 13 or 14.
Likewise, boys who "liked" each other at age eight may have healthy sexual encounters together, aided by porn videos that the American Library Association sued to make available in every library. To deny this would be to discriminate against the expression of their orientation and "normal" same-sex dating behaviors. With no sexually transmitted diseases in the young and innocent, public-health experts can see no reason why parents shouldn't allow this mutual masturbation as a healthy outlet. Just because a camp counselor may often watch them doesn't mean there's anything wrong with him, either. He may have valuable advice to give them as a fully adjusted "gay" man.
When Josh and Matt began seeing each other as a couple in middle school, it took some time for their parents to realize it's OK for them to spend the night together in Matt's bedroom. After all, dating is different for same-sex couples. They know how to be "safe" together. Another guy couple they know – Kyle and Brian – will break up when 15-year-old Brian begins to date a 25-year-old neighbor.
That will be OK once age-of-consent laws for same-sex relationships are eliminated. After all, when pregnancy isn't an issue, there's no risk as long as "safe" gay sex is practiced, a subject which will consume considerable more time in health education classes. It would be discriminatory to deny someone the opportunity to engage in customary courtship behavior, just as people have down through the ages. And for same-sex couples to date, age shouldn't be a barrier. After all, no one picks who they fall in "love" with. Fortunately, there will be enlightened judges who'll see the rationale here.
Like other public schools, rumor will have it that there was a mass exodus from this high school after the legalization of same-sex marriage. The figure will be as high as 50 percent in some districts. However, such actions would be pointless, since the Supreme Court will soon rule that only faiths that don't preach "hate" qualify for constitutional protection, tax-free status or school charters. So religious schools and home-schoolers will have to demonstrate that tolerance teaching has been absorbed adequately and that these students' homes don't foster homophobia.
Of course, a few loose ends still need to be tied up. Adam, a 29-year-old young man dying of AIDS, attended this high school. It was at a meeting of the school's gay-straight alliance club years ago that he met Stuart, an older man who was the openly homosexual guest speaker. A sexual relationship began without the knowledge of Adam's parents. Adam was 15 at the time, and Stuart was HIV positive. Stuart died several years ago. Adam has since left homosexuality, but could not leave the consequences. The school had been advised by the National Education Association and other powerful groups not to tell him or any other student that many people leave homosexuality, so Adam was ignorant about this option.
The lawsuit Adam will file against the school and its board members, individually and collectively, will probably go nowhere. No judge will believe him when he says he was never homosexual in the first place and that none of this needed to happen. After all, everyone knows homosexuals are born that way and no young person can be seduced into the lifestyle.
The latest statistics will show that 40 percent of the population is "gay," lesbian, bisexual or transgendered. And we all know that statistics don't lie.
Ping
Ping
That's already starting as we saw here where it was said:
"I'm really offended that [former homosexuals are] even here," a delegate wearing the rainbow emblem of the NEA Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Caucus told a supporter of the new NEA Ex-Gay Educators Caucus.
So open, aggressive ogling and come-ons will be the daily locker-room life of every boy who takes gym. But many guys will adjust after sitting through countless hours of classroom indoctrination about how sex and gender are just biological accidents that savvy humans can mold and shape however we want.
Just click here to see what the homosexual agenda is doing in our schools.
And then, and then as with Sodom and Gomorrah cometh the end!
Afterwards they'll have anal sex on the beach and Matt will end up HIV positive.
Same sex marriage is the "Reefer Madness" of the new millenium. This article is silly.
Real men (both gay and straight) are suddenly going to let themselves become feminized?? Hey, somehow real men made through the 70s and the New Alan Alda. Football will not become coed.
Most gays are NOT going to get married, people. Especially the men. Sure, they might clamor for the right to do so, but when 90% of them realize they have to be responsible for their partner's DEBTS too, it's just NOT going to happen that often.
I know the Bible is against homosexuality, but it's against coveting and a lot of other things. The problem rests between the individual and G-d.
If all people kept their sexuality private, and if institutions stopped foisting sexual agendas on ever younger children, we'd all be a lot better off.
Your last comment says it all. Most of us who are vocal about protesting the "gay" agenda would not care if homosexuals kept their private lives private. I would not care at all. Not at all.
But their agenda is to dominate, be completely intolerant of any diversity of viewpoint about it, while mandating by judicial fiat society changes such as same sex marriage, workplace "sensitivity training", outward displays of homosexuality, and worst of all, indoctrination and recruitment in public schools all across the country.
That cannot be tolerated, unless we want to see civilization crumble. If you doubt it, or you think I am being paranoid, just read the links.
Thanks for the ping.
People may think that this article is way off course.
It's not that bad yet. Yet.
They want OUR children.
- Homosexual Agenda PING -
A glimpse of what's to come if the tidal wave isn't stopped here and now.
(If you want on or off this ping list, please FReepmail me.)
Not to mention sand in his shorts.
Already there are rules prohibiting guys from playing sports. There are more programs for girls than boys, and there is a federal rule which can prohibit boys from having sports programmes.
The US Olympic Committee has already shown its concern after baseball and men's soccer didn't qualify, and the decline in men winning at the Olympics has shown as more Olympic programmes (T&F, S&D, baseball, gymnastics, crew, et al) are being cut from colleges to please the feminazis.
Will there be a day when football fields on high schools are empty as federal governments shut down the programmes? Already in Johnson City, TN, feminist requests help shut down a Division I-AA Southern Conference power, East Tennessee State, over feminist orders to cut men's sports as part of budget cuts to please federal government Title IX freaks.
Jessica Gavora's book Tilting the Playing Field is right.
Like other public schools, rumor will have it that there was a mass exodus from this high school after the legalization of same-sex marriage. The figure will be as high as 50 percent in some districts. However, such actions would be pointless, since the Supreme Court will soon rule that only faiths that don't preach "hate" qualify for constitutional protection, tax-free status or school charters. So religious schools and home-schoolers will have to demonstrate that tolerance teaching has been absorbed adequately and that these students' homes don't foster homophobia.
I wouldn't be surprised if somebody tries pushing a law forcing home-schoolers to teach tolerance. After adopting two boys and thinking of adopting another, the agency started offering tolerance classes for couples who wanting to adopt. At the current rate we're slipping that class will probably be required someday.
So true. So very true.
I agree. But to them, "tolerance" doesn't mean live and let live. They want us to be "tolerant" under their definition. Meaning that we must approve and rejoice about their choice. We must all bow down and admit that all we've learned about homosexuality was wrong; we have to say that their choice is just as valid as ours.
And that ain't gonna happen.
Conservative gays have managed to change my position on gay legal unions (I am for them now). But I will forever despise the "gay agenda" and the in-your-face sexuality permeating the media and the public sphere.
Gay rights should not include the right to normalize promiscuousness.
The problem is that promiscuity is the very foundation of the "gay" life. Especially for men. The rates of promiscuity (what to speak of orgies, anonymous and otherwise) are so much vastly higher for homosexuals than normal people that they can't even be compared.
Remember, in Great Britain, homosexuals got all outraged that some MPs wanted to make it against the law to have anonymous cruising sex in public bathrooms. The "gay" activists said it was their culture, and anyone who opposed such practices was a homophobe.
You might want to re-think your support for civil unions. It's marriage by another name. Additionally, homosexual spokespeople themselves have admitted openly that the reason they want "marriage" is not to promote monogamy or a replica of natural marriages, but to re-define the very meaning of family. I have some quotes I post every now and then about that, ping me if you want them. They're *very* eye-opening. And they are not "radicals" - they're the mainstream homosexuals.
They admit that they want to destroy the moral foundation of society.
BTTT for later comment...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.