Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Rodney Alexander (D-LA) Has Switched Parties
http://www.sec.state.la.us/cgibin/?rqstyp=CNDMD&rqsdta=110204&ID=14519062&ID=14519063&ID=14519064&ID ^ | 8/6/2004 | RepublicanWizard

Posted on 08/06/2004 3:10:41 PM PDT by republicanwizard

At last! Some good news today! Congressman Rodney Alexander has switched parties!


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: alexander; realignment; republican; rodneyalexander
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj; JohnnyZ; AuH2ORepublican; William Creel; Clintonfatigued; shanscom

This is a bit of a shocker. Rodney Alexander would have won easily no matter what party he belonged to. Bayou love their incumbents. Moreoever, the LA-05 has shown a distinct RAT trend in the 2003 elections. I guess Nancy Pelosi has little tolerance for diverse viewpoints.


81 posted on 08/06/2004 8:25:41 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool; JohnnyZ; AuH2ORepublican; William Creel; Clintonfatigued; shanscom
"I guess Nancy Pelosi has little tolerance for diverse viewpoints."

Sure she has tolerance for diverse viewpoints. Socialism AND Marxism.

82 posted on 08/06/2004 9:21:06 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~John Kerry, A Little Bit Nutty and a Little Bit Slutty~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard; All

Good news. Thanks for the post. Thanks to everyone for all of the information on Rodney Alexander. Welcome aboard Congressman!


83 posted on 08/06/2004 9:25:28 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: THE MODERATE

There is no way the 3rd and 5th districts as currently drawn will elect a demonrat.


84 posted on 08/06/2004 9:58:53 PM PDT by Impy (The DCCC and DSCC are terrorist organizations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr

Virginia has changed greatly over the years. The suburbs of Washington, D.C., collectively known as Northern Virginia, are rapidly growing with northern migrants and government workers. These communities are more liberal than the rest of the state, and are the fastest-growing part of the state. They voted for Gore in 2000, and will support Kerry this time.

I'm not saying Kerry is favored to win, but he has a shot due to demographics.


85 posted on 08/06/2004 9:58:59 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Originally posted by Clintonfatigued:

Virginia has changed greatly over the years. The suburbs of Washington, D.C., collectively known as Northern Virginia, are rapidly growing with northern migrants and government workers. These communities are more liberal than the rest of the state, and are the fastest-growing part of the state. They voted for Gore in 2000, and will support Kerry this time.

I'm not saying Kerry is favored to win, but he has a shot due to demographics.



Having lived in Fairfax County since 1976, I am aware of the infrastructure and population change of the area, but Northern Virginia went for Bush in 2000 by a little over 2%, while the Commonwealth as a whole favored Bush by about 8% over Gore. Sometimes the liberal bastions of Alexandria and Arlington mask the fact that since 1952, Northern Virginia as a whole always comes (with the exception of the Goldwater blowout of 1964) through for the Republican presidential candidate, a record that no other region of the Commonwealth can claim. Northern Virginia is doing just fine. Remember that to liberals Virginia is a black-hole in which they live to throw away their presidential votes...

Now one of the common themes in many of the above quotes is the fear that Virginia might slowly flip to the Democrats in Presidential elections because of changing demographics due to the overwhelming influx of damnyankees to what is commonly termed "Northern Virginia". I disagree. My contention is that Northern Virginia is one of the most reliably Republican areas in Presidential elections since the 1952 first-term election of Eisenhower. The margin of victory may vary, but it is victory nonetheless...

Now it is somewhat hard to pin down exactly what is meant by the term "Northern Virginia" as may be read in the article Where is Northern Virginia? by a Mr. Risse. I have my definition of "Northern Virginia" for the purposes of this political discourse. My belief is that Northern Virginia consists of the Counties of Arlington, Clarke, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick, Loudoun, Prince William, Shenandoah, Stafford and Warren. Inside this geographic area are the independent Cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, Manassas Park and Winchester. (Yes there is both a Fairfax County and an independent Fairfax City inside the County for those not familiar with Virginia)

Now let us look at some Virginia voting history in the Presidential elections held since the end of Reconstruction. Virginia voted for the Democrat nominee from post Reconstruction (1876) to 1948 every time with the single exception of her 1928 Republican vote for Herbert Hoover. Virginia has voted since 1952 to the present day for the Republican nominee every time with the single exception of her 1964 Democrat vote for Lyndon Johnson.

I detect a pattern.

Virginia Presidential Voting
1892 - 2000

  Year     Total Vote   D  R  I     Margin     %Margin        Dem.       Rep.         Ind.        Oth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  2000      2,739,447   2  1  3    220,200       8.04%       44.44%     52.47%       2.17%       0.92%
  1996      2,416,642   2  1  3     47,290       1.96%       45.15%     47.10%       6.62%       1.13%
  1992      2,558,665   2  1  3    111,867       4.37%       40.59%     44.97%      13.63%       0.82%
  1988      2,191,609   2  1       449,363      20.50%       39.23%     59.74%       0.00%       1.03%
  1984      2,146,635   2  1       540,828      25.19%       37.09%     62.29%       0.00%       0.62%
  1980      1,866,032   2  1  3    237,435      12.72%       40.31%     53.03%       5.11%       1.55%
  1976      1,697,094   2  1        22,658       1.34%       47.96%     49.29%       0.00%       2.75%
  1972      1,457,019   2  1       549,606      37.72%       30.12%     67.84%       0.00%       2.03%
  1968      1,361,491   2  1  3    147,932      10.87%       32.49%     43.36%      23.64%       0.51%
  1964      1,042,267   1  2        76,704       7.36%       53.54%     46.18%       0.00%       0.28%
  1960        771,449   2  1        42,194       5.47%       46.97%     52.44%       0.00%       0.60%
  1956        697,978   2  1       118,699      17.01%       38.36%     55.37%       0.00%       6.27%
  1952        619,689   2  1        80,360      12.97%       43.36%     56.32%       0.00%       0.32%
  1948        419,256   1  2  3     28,716       6.85%       47.89%     41.04%      10.35%       0.72%
  1944        388,485   1  2        97,033      24.98%       62.36%     37.39%       0.00%       0.25%
  1940        346,607   1  2       126,598      36.52%       68.08%     31.55%       0.00%       0.37%
  1936        334,590   1  2       136,644      40.84%       70.23%     29.39%       0.00%       0.38%
  1932        297,942   1  2       114,342      38.38%       68.46%     30.09%       0.00%       1.45%
  1928        305,358   2  1        24,463       8.01%       45.90%     53.91%       0.00%       0.20%
  1924        223,602   1  2  3     66,404      29.70%       62.48%     32.79%       4.64%       0.09%
  1920        231,033   1  2        54,214      23.47%       61.32%     37.85%       0.00%       0.83%
  1916        152,025   1  2        53,456      35.16%       66.99%     31.83%       0.00%       1.18%
  1912        136,975   1  2  3     67,044      48.95%       65.95%     17.00%      15.90%       1.15%
  1908        137,065   1  2        30,374      22.16%       60.52%     38.36%       0.00%       1.13%
  1904        130,410   1  2        32,469      24.90%       61.84%     36.95%       0.00%       1.21%
  1900        264,208   1  2        30,310      11.47%       55.29%     43.82%       0.00%       0.89%
  1896        294,674   1  2        19,329       6.56%       52.50%     45.94%       0.00%       1.56%
  1892        292,238   1  2  3     51,038      17.46%       56.17%     38.70%       4.20%       0.93%

Source: Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Virginia Historical

We are most interested in the margin of victory for the 1952-2000 period and what geographical areas contributed to said margin. Outside of the LBJ (D) nationwide landslide in 1964, Northern Virginia has been going reliably Republican since 1952, something which other regions of the Commonwealth can not claim. From the ever useful web based Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections come the following graphics of Virginia presidential election outcomes by County/City from the years 1960 to 2000.

Virginia Presidential Voting Patterns
Counties and Cities
1960 - 2000

Legend
Blue - Republican
Red - Democrat
Green - Independent


Virginia 2000 by County/City: pe2000VA

Virginia 1996 by County/City: pe1996VA

Virginia 1992 by County/City: pe1992VA

Virginia 1988 by County/City: pe1988VA

Virginia 1984 by County/City: pe1984VA

Virginia 1980 by County/City: pe1980VA

Virginia 1976 by County/City: pe1976VA

Virginia 1972 by County/City: pe1972VA

Virginia 1968 by County/City: pe1968VA

Virginia 1964 by County/City: pe1964VA

Virginia 1960 by County/City: pe1960VA

Source: US Election Atlas - Virginia - Presidential Election Map Comparison

Now people are always worried about the changing demographics in Virginia, especially Northern Virginia, but forget that for every liberal damnyankee who moves to this region of the Commonwealth is balanced by military retirees and defense contractors who decide to live and work in Northern Virginia. It is true that there are pockets which heavily favor Democrats such as the City of Alexandria and the County of Arlington. However, these two Democrat bastions are counter-balanced by the rest of Northern Virginia.

I have selected the detailed information for the Northern Virginia area for the elections years 1960, 1980, 2000. With these elections separated by twenty years, the two 'book-end' elections had no incumbent running for re-election; all three elections had third parties to split off the weaker Republicans and Democrats; consists of two close national elections and one national blow-out. Here is the data on how the Northern Virginia votes total in each election and how the region fares against the results and victory margin of the whole Commonwealth of Virginia.

                            2000                                 1980                                 1960
     Counties      -------------------------          --------------------------          ---------------------------

Arlington          Gore    60.10%     50,260          Carter    39.60%    26,502          Kennedy    48.10%    22,095 
                   Bush    34.20%     28,555          Reagan    46.10%    30,854          Nixon      51.40%    23,632 
                   Nader    4.70%      3,952          Anderson  12.00%     8,042          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.90%        792          Other      2.20%     1,463          Other       0.50%       250

Clarke             Gore    41.00%      2,166          Carter    35.40%     1,156          Kennedy    53.20%       923 
                   Bush    54.60%      2,883          Reagan    57.40%     1,876          Nixon      46.30%       804 
                   Nader    3.70%        195          Anderson   5.40%       177          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.80%         40          Other      1.70%        57          Other       0.50%         9

Fairfax            Gore    47.50%    196,501          Carter    30.80%    73,734          Kennedy    48.10%    26,064 
                   Bush    48.90%    202,181          Reagan    57.40%   137,620          Nixon      51.70%    28,006 
                   Nader    2.90%     12,201          Anderson  10.30%    24,605          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.70%      2,892          Other      1.60%     3,746          Other       0.30%       149

Fauquier           Gore    35.30%      8,296          Carter    35.30%     4,119          Kennedy    47.80%     1,958 
                   Bush    61.60%     14,456          Reagan    58.10%     6,782          Nixon      51.90%     2,123 
                   Nader    2.40%        570          Anderson   4.70%       548          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.70%        159          Other      1.90%       221          Other       0.30%        13

Frederick          Gore    32.00%      7,158          Carter    27.30%     2,948          Kennedy    45.80%     1,757 
                   Bush    65.10%     14,574          Reagan    67.60%     7,293          Nixon      53.70%     2,061 
                   Nader    2.20%        483          Anderson   4.20%       455          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.80%        177          Other      0.80%        91          Other       0.40%        17

Loudoun            Gore    40.90%     30,938          Carter    32.70%     6,694          Kennedy    48.40%     2,399 
                   Bush    56.10%     42,453          Reagan    58.90%    12,076          Nixon      51.00%     2,526 
                   Nader    2.20%      1,665          Anderson   6.40%     1,312          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.80%        597          Other      2.00%       410          Other       0.60%        29

Prince William     Gore    44.50%     44,745          Carter    32.70%    12,787          Kennedy    53.00%     2,987 
                   Bush    52.50%     52,788          Reagan    59.00%    23,061          Nixon      46.50%     2,624 
                   Nader    1.90%      1,927          Anderson   6.80%     2,676          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    1.00%      1,051          Other      1.50%       595          Other       0.50%        28

Shenandoah         Gore    30.60%      4,420          Carter    28.00%     3,137          Kennedy    33.10%     2,053 
                   Bush    66.70%      9,636          Reagan    67.10%     7,517          Nixon      66.80%     4,144 
                   Nader    2.00%        294          Anderson   3.40%       385          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.70%        102          Other      1.50%       164          Other       0.00%         2

Stafford           Gore    36.80%     12,596          Carter    34.90%     4,211          Kennedy    50.40%     1,494 
                   Bush    60.50%     20,731          Reagan    58.80%     7,106          Nixon      48.80%     1,447 
                   Nader    1.90%        657          Anderson   5.20%       623          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.80%        262          Other      1.10%       135          Other       0.80%        24

Warren             Gore    38.60%      4,313          Carter    37.50%     2,597          Kennedy    49.70%     1,850 
                   Bush    56.70%      6,335          Reagan    55.80%     3,861          Nixon      49.50%     1,842 
                   Nader    2.30%        260          Anderson   4.30%       297          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    2.30%        258          Other      2.40%       165          Other       0.80%        28
     Cities

Alexandria         Gore    60.90%     33,633          Carter    42.40%    17,134          Kennedy    52.10%     9,662 
                   Bush    34.50%     19,043          Reagan    44.20%    17,865          Nixon      47.60%     8,826 
                   Nader    3.80%      2,094          Anderson  11.30%     4,546          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.80%        429          Other      2.10%       843          Other       0.30%        63

Fairfax            Gore    45.60%      4,361          Carter    32.70%     2,614          Part of Fairfax County until 1961
                   Bush    49.80%      4,762          Reagan    55.90%     4,475 
                   Nader    3.70%        352          Anderson  10.00%       800 
                   Other    0.80%         81          Other      1.40%       115

Falls Church       Gore    55.60%      3,109          Carter    35.80%     1,703          Kennedy    51.50%     1,629 
                   Bush    38.10%      2,131          Reagan    52.20%     2,485          Nixon      48.20%     1,525 
                   Nader    5.10%        285          Anderson  10.40%       497          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    1.20%         68          Other      1.50%        73          Other       0.30%        11

Manassas           Gore    42.40%      5,262          Carter    31.60%     1,565          Part of Prince William
                   Bush    54.40%      6,752          Reagan    60.80%     3,009          County until 1975
                   Nader    1.90%        230          Anderson   6.40%       318 
                   Other    1.30%        166          Other      1.20%        60

Manassas Park      Gore    40.60%      1,048          Carter    35.60%       447          Part of Prince William
                   Bush    56.60%      1,460          Reagan    58.10%       729          County until 1975
                   Nader    2.00%         51          Anderson   4.10%        52 
                   Other    0.80%         21          Other      2.10%        26

Winchester         Gore    42.10%      3,318          Carter    30.30%     2,006          Kennedy    33.90%     1,203 
                   Bush    54.70%      4,314          Reagan    64.00%     4,240          Nixon      65.60%     2,326 
                   Nader    2.70%        209          Anderson   4.80%       320          Unpledged   0.00%         0 
                   Other    0.60%         45          Other      0.90%        57          Other       0.50%        16

                   -------------------------          --------------------------          ---------------------------

Northern Virginia  Gore    46.95%    412,124          Carter    33.47%   163,354          Kennedy    47.97%    76,074
                   Bush    49.34%    433,054          Reagan    55.49%   270,849          Nixon      51.63%    81,886
                   Nader    2.90%     25,425          Anderson   9.35%    45,653          Unpledged   0.00%         0
                   Other    0.81%      7,140          Other      1.68%     8,221          Other       0.40%       639
                   =========================          ==========================          ===========================
                   Total  100.00%    877,743          Total    100.00%   488,077          Total     100.00%   158,599
                   Margin   2.38%      Bush           Margin    22.02%   Reagan           Margin      3.66%    Nixon


Virginia  (Total)  Gore    44.44%  1,217,290          Carter    40.31%   752,174          Kennedy    46.97%   362,327
                   Bush    52.47%  1,437,490          Reagan    53.03%   989,609          Nixon      52.44%   404,521
                   Nader    2.17%     59,398          Anderson   5.11%    95,418          Unpledged   0.00%         0
                   Other    0.92%     25,269          Other      1.55%    28,831          Other       0.60%     4,601
                   =========================          ==========================          ===========================
                   Total  100.00%  2,739,447          Total    100.00% 1,866,032          Total     100.00%   771,449
                   Margin   8.04%       Bush          Margin    12.72%    Reagan          Margin      5.47%     Nixon

Source: Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Virginia

So what results do we have to compare wtih two non-incumbent elections sandwiching a Southern Democrat President running for re-election in Virginia? It will be interesting to see how a Southern Republican President running for re-election fares in Virginia in 2004.

In 1960 Nixon  defeated Kennedy in Virginia by  5.47%, in Northern Virginia by  3.66%.
In 1980 Reagan defeated  Carter in Virginia by 12.72%, in Northern Virginia by 22.02%.
In 2000 Bush   defeated    Gore in Virginia by  8.04%, in Northern Virginia by  2.38%.

Between this data and the above listed County/City maps of the Commonwealth, I think that there is a bit too much "the sky is falling" worry by those who don't see the demographics as a roughly equal change for both Republicans and Democrats in the Northern Virginia region, which has had a Republican lead since 1952.

I hope that John Kerry throws his advertising money away in Virginia, it will do him no good in the end. Virginia (and Northern Virginia) will go for Bush in 2004, win or lose nationally. The spirit of the Army of Northern Virginia lives on...

dvwjr

86 posted on 08/06/2004 10:38:35 PM PDT by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard

Quickly, I hope, the pubbies will usher that guy into the delousing chamber and give him a good shakedown, after which he can enter Summer Reprogramming Camp.

Good for him and may many more flock in.


87 posted on 08/06/2004 10:40:07 PM PDT by GretchenM (A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy
I tend to agree with you on the 5th, it would be a big upset if a Democrat won there, the 3rd though has been a long held and poorly kept secret that this is Basnights district if he wants it when Jones retires, Basnight drew that district and many local Republicans have complained he drew it for himself. But if Basnight does not run the GOP may well have an edge. The question there is this a Republican district or a Walter Jones district, I grew up in that district and I tend to think it was the latter.
88 posted on 08/07/2004 5:47:50 AM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: THE MODERATE

Basnight would have to be pretty popular to win in a seat that voted 65% for Bush and 62% for Jesse Helms. Is he that popular? To say he has a chance is one thing but I can't see any dem being a lock in that district.


89 posted on 08/07/2004 7:26:16 AM PDT by Impy (The DCCC and DSCC are terrorist organizations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Basnight is the Mike Madigan of NC. He could make the NC-03 competitive. Plus he is good at fooling Jesse Helms voters that he is conservative.
90 posted on 08/07/2004 7:30:01 AM PDT by Kuksool (Get Your Souls To The Polls In November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Plus he is good at fooling Jesse Helms voters that he is conservative.

Basnight is supposed to be pro-life. I don't know whether his voting record bears that out or not.

91 posted on 08/07/2004 8:00:24 AM PDT by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
It is hard to say, because the state has not held an abortion vote of any kind in many years. He also is considered pro-second amendment, and at one time his votes reflected that but we have also not voted on that in some time.
92 posted on 08/07/2004 8:48:21 AM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Impy
If he is not that popular he is close. On paper his Senate seat should be more competitive than it is. Before he entered elective politics he contributed to Helms campaign and was thought himself to be a Jessecrat.
93 posted on 08/07/2004 8:51:11 AM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard

All I can say is that is really good news!!! It proves that the Democrats aren't on as much of a roll as they claim.


94 posted on 08/07/2004 9:04:51 AM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr

That's quite an impressive posting. I overestimated the impact of government workers. As you pointed out, a lot of defense and intelligence deptartment workers reside in Virginia, while their more liberal education/human services/legal activist counterparts choose to live in Maryland.

Part of the alarm you speak of is that Clinton almost won Virginia twice, and Gore ran stronger in Virginia than in most southern states.


95 posted on 08/07/2004 9:25:17 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool; THE MODERATE

I remember his name. Did he explore a run for the house or senate in 2002?


96 posted on 08/07/2004 12:17:35 PM PDT by Impy (The DCCC and DSCC are terrorist organizations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Yes he was thought to be a candidate for the US Senate in 2002 but he was able convince Bowles to run, he was also the main player to get Edwards and Bowles in this year his dislike of Edwards was not a poorly kept secret but he is nominally back Kerry Edwards.
97 posted on 08/07/2004 3:01:43 PM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; fieldmarshaldj; JohnnyZ

"I also think Tennessee and North Carolina are overrepresented by Dems in their delegations, but someone who knows those states would know the specifics of how their seats are drawn up."



Both TN and NC have RAT gerrymanders that, together with the power of incumbency, result in Democrats being overrepresented in Congress. If the GOP could control redistricting in those states, the TN House delegation could go from 5 RATs and 4 Republicans to 7 Republicans and 2 RATs, and the NC House delegation could go from 7 Republicans and 6 Democrats to 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats.


98 posted on 08/09/2004 7:35:52 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
the NC House delegation could go from 7 Republicans and 6 Democrats to 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats.

Only with the right candidates, I think. Isolate the Watt, Butterfield, and Chapel Hill districts and split up the rest, and you probably limit the delegation to 3 liberal Dems and 10 moderates/conservatives, mostly Republican.

99 posted on 08/09/2004 8:10:29 AM PDT by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Basnight would have to be pretty popular

He's more powerful than popular IMO, but really, which is more important? With a Democrat party 'led' by a detached governor, there are several power figures, and Basnight is one of them. I think we'll get a good picture of who's aligned with whom in 2008 when the D's need to pick a Guv nominee (assuming we aren't treated to another couple terms of Jim Hunt).

100 posted on 08/09/2004 8:18:00 AM PDT by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson