Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Pushes a Sweeping Overhaul of Basic Training
NY Times ^ | August 4, 2004 | THOM SHANKER

Posted on 08/04/2004 6:59:41 PM PDT by neverdem

WASHINGTON, Aug. 3 - The United States Army is pressing into place sweeping changes in its basic training program, introducing rigorous new drills and intensive work on combat skills to prepare recruits for immediate missions to Iraq and Afghanistan.

In what officers describe as the most striking changes to basic training since the Vietnam era, soldiers whose specialties traditionally kept them far from the front - clerks, cooks, truck drivers and communications technicians - will undergo far more stressful training. The new training regimen includes additional time dodging real bullets, more opportunities to fire weapons, including heavy machine guns, and increasing the time spent practicing urban combat and hiking and sleeping in the field during the nine-week courses.

Before Iraq, freshly minted soldiers could expect months, if not years, of additional training in their assigned units before seeing combat.

But with the Army stretched today by long-term deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, a growing percentage of new soldiers are in combat zones within 30 days of being assigned to a unit, Army officials say. Even those whose specialties are not combat arms often face situations where the traditional distinction between hazardous front lines and secure rear areas has vanished.

"Historically, combat support specialists had been in the rear of the battlefield, far from direct contact with the enemy," said Col. Bill Gallagher, commander of the basic combat training brigade at Fort Benning, Ga. "The emphasis in their training was more on the technical side of their specialties, not on the combat side."

But in the missions soldiers face today, "there is no front, there is no rear," he said. "Soldiers of all specialties will face direct contact with an adversary. They all have to have a common set of combat skills. A sense of urgency dictated that we analyze what skills are required of them in Iraq, or in Afghanistan, and how to update the nine-week program back in the States."

The changes were endorsed at a meeting of the Army's training brigade commanders in June, and were promptly put into effect on an official, if still interim, basis at all five installations where the Army conducts its basic training.

The Army's senior leadership must approve the plan for it to become a formal part of the service's training, and additional financing must be secured for the changes to become permanent, as more realistic live-fire training and longer field maneuvers are more expensive. The changes grew out of various studies dating to last summer of lessons learned in both Afghanistan and Iraq, when senior officials realized it was time to update the tasks and drills in basic training, with an emphasis on combat skills for all those in uniform.

"This is the new mentality that says, 'Everybody is going to be a warrior first,' everybody is going to have the ability to defend themselves and survive in combat," said William F. Briscoe, director of the directorate for training plans and capabilities review at the Army's Training and Doctrine Command at Fort Monroe, Va.

In discussing the changes to basic training, Army officers do not specifically acknowledge how deeply the military was stung by some high-profile combat failings, including the attack on an Army support convoy near Nasiriya, Iraq, early in the war. During that firefight, troops of the 507th Maintenance Company were outmaneuvered and then outgunned by Iraqi irregulars.

Previous Army training programs for these noncombat specialties required less than one week of field training. Under the interim training program, they will spend up to 16 days in the field. And that time out in the woods has been consciously designed to be more stressful, requiring soldiers in training to carry heavier loads of water and ammunition, and allowing less time for them to sleep and eat.

Support soldiers are also receiving added training for military operations in urban areas, which includes drills in how to enter a building held by hostile forces and to run convoys through contested territory. They will receive additional practice in how to manage prisoners of war and how to maneuver and fight when civilians are in the line of fire.

"We are teaching quick-fire techniques, moving in an urban environment - things that have not been done in basic training for combat support and combat service support before," said Lt. Col. Fred W. Johnson, commander of a basic training battalion at Fort Jackson, S.C., where the Army conducts its mixed-sex training.

"And we are introducing an emerging leadership program," Colonel Johnson said. "We don't expect to create junior officers, but we are teaching basic leadership techniques: accountability, precombat inspections, how to motivate a small element to accomplish a mission."

The changes in basic training will be seen mostly in the initial nine-week course given recruits whose tasks will be combat support or combat service support - two categories of Army duty that include engineering, personnel, transportation, maintenance and logistics - rather than for those in the combat arms specialties of infantry, armor, artillery and aviation. After basic training, the support troops receive focused training in their specialties before assignments to units.

While previous generations may recall basic training being the same for all recruits, the modern Army allows many new soldiers to choose their specialties when they sign up, and basic training is divided between those who go into combat arms and those who go into support jobs.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Georgia; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; basictraining; unitedstatesarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Mario Villafuerte for The New York Times
The Iraq war is changing basic training. National Guard members at Fort Polk, La., learned last February to interact with Iraqi civilians.

Fort Benning does One Site Unit Training(OSUT) for the Infantry. Fort Sill and Fort Knox do the same for the Artillery and Armor branches of combat arms. Fort Jackson does the mixed sex basic training. Does anyone know what other fort conducts OSUT or basic training?

1 posted on 08/04/2004 6:59:41 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Fort Sill and Fort Knox do the same for the Artillery and Armor branches of combat arms, respectively.


2 posted on 08/04/2004 7:01:16 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

'Everybody is going to be a warrior first,'

I think the Jarheads already have this.


3 posted on 08/04/2004 7:09:54 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (Sane, and have the papers to prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I believe Fort Leonard Wood does Combat Engineers and MP'S.


4 posted on 08/04/2004 7:18:06 PM PDT by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

You are correct. I worked with many air wing Marines while I was in the Navy. Every Marine is an infantryman first.


5 posted on 08/04/2004 7:18:37 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
'Everybody is going to be a warrior first,'

You would think this should be the standard procedure primarily, The military is not the boy scouts.

6 posted on 08/04/2004 7:25:13 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (G W B 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Way back in 1984, Ft Bliss did OSUT for ADA troops. We had no females in our training battalion, with the exception of our training battery commander. Damn shame that she couldn't keep up on battery runs after the first few weeks...

No, really!

7 posted on 08/04/2004 7:26:12 PM PDT by drachenfels ("Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

Just underscores how far we fell during the Clintoon "be all that you can be" years.


8 posted on 08/04/2004 7:28:40 PM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"...but we are teaching basic leadership techniques: accountability, ...how to motivate a small element to accomplish a mission."

Precisely why I prefer working alongside vets.


9 posted on 08/04/2004 7:29:59 PM PDT by baltodog (There are three kinds of people: Those who can count, and those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Fort Benning does One Site Unit Training(OSUT) for the Infantry. Fort Sill and Fort Knox do the same for the Artillery and Armor branches of combat arms. Fort Jackson does the mixed sex basic training. Does anyone know what other fort conducts OSUT or basic training?"

Nope. You got 'em all.


10 posted on 08/04/2004 7:33:14 PM PDT by writer33 (Try this link: http://www.whiskeycreekpress.com/books/electivedecisions.shtml)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The new training regimen includes additional time dodging real bullets

Its about 15 feet over your head now (I heard a story about a recruit committing suicide by standing up, don't know if its true).

more opportunities to fire weapons

After zeroing and grouping, there is 3 days of going to the range before qualifying. Typically you go to the firing line twice in a day, firing two mags of 20 bullets each time.

including heavy machine guns

50 rounds on the SAW and 50 rounds on the 240B.

and increasing the time spent practicing urban combat

2 Days of MOUT, 1 day is all lecture. The other day was more lecture, broke into 4 man firing teams, and each team cleared one room.

And this was OSUT INFANTRY at BENNING!

11 posted on 08/04/2004 7:36:26 PM PDT by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf; Darksheare; 300winmag

ping


12 posted on 08/04/2004 7:36:55 PM PDT by Professional Engineer (Why do other laugh when I admit my I.Q. is 11EEE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writer33
Nope. You got 'em all.

Are you sure? I know Combat Engineers who say they did OSUT at Lost Woods. I thought MPS did OSUT too.

13 posted on 08/04/2004 7:37:47 PM PDT by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: writer33
The story says there are five.

"The changes were endorsed at a meeting of the Army's training brigade commanders in June, and were promptly put into effect on an official, if still interim, basis at all five installations where the Army conducts its basic training."

14 posted on 08/04/2004 7:37:50 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer

Saw this on the news today. IMHO, should have been done loa long time ago. Every soldier should be a rifleman first. Works for the Marines.


15 posted on 08/04/2004 7:38:45 PM PDT by SAMWolf (Was today really Necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

LW handles MP, Comb. Eng., And (I think) Chem.

But the problems don't seem to be with LW. Because of the MOS taught there....they have been on top of things. For quite a few that do Basic at LW....they are dang close to the status of OSUT.
There has been some problems at Jackson. And DIs have started talking. Word is the problems do not just relate to the training doctrine. The thing is...it is hard to tell if the words are accurate or incredible rumor. But again, DIs have started to talk. And not just to people like Hackworth. TRADOC has taken notice.


16 posted on 08/04/2004 7:39:33 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K
You would think this should be the standard procedure primarily, The military is not the boy scouts.

This became harder with a voluntary force. In order to recruit and retain, the services offered other than strictly warrior training. The Marines could get away with it because, well, they're Marines.

17 posted on 08/04/2004 7:40:03 PM PDT by YankeeDoodleBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

"You would think this should be the standard procedure primarily, The military is not the boy scouts."

It was prior to the Clinton years. During those years, sexual harrasment and other cosemtic things were focused on instead of the all important training. I can tell you budgets were of so much importance that training suffered because of lack of funding.


18 posted on 08/04/2004 7:40:22 PM PDT by writer33 (Try this link: http://www.whiskeycreekpress.com/books/electivedecisions.shtml)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chudogg

LW could be holding OSUT now.

They have been dang close to the set up as it was.


19 posted on 08/04/2004 7:43:01 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
How much of this less rigorous training was to accomodate the female recruits?
20 posted on 08/04/2004 7:44:27 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson