Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Heterophobia
Mens News Daily ^ | August 5, 2004 | Bernard Chapin

Posted on 08/04/2004 6:04:19 PM PDT by Vision Thing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Vision Thing
Does laughter=hate?

This is the crux of the homophobia position. Often when one is called a homophobe it is due to finding humor in gay behavior. Yet such a presumption rings false. One almost never derives laughter from what is hated or feared.

Really? Then what was blackface all about? Maybe you all can explain that.

41 posted on 08/05/2004 3:50:57 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Quite Right!


42 posted on 08/05/2004 3:53:29 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Bury them with a pig's hoof in their mouth......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mlmr
Most of what is commonly called homophobia is actually disgust at homosexual behavior.

This, by the way, is a perfectly natural reaction. It is innate and can not be changed. People who are born with this reaction of disgust should be tolerated, not villified. People who attack the intolerant are no better than the KKK. We need to expose homophobophobia wherever we find it. Those who were born intolerant should stop skulking around in closets. If the thought of two men french kissing makes you want to barf, don't be ashamed. Come out! Proudly proclaim, "We're here. We're intolerant. Get used to it!

Shalom.

43 posted on 08/05/2004 5:52:21 AM PDT by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
Unfortunately for us, they are hungry for our attention and won't quit until we all bow before them in worship.

Ultimately homosexuality is a symptom of narcissism. Henry Higgins asks, "Why can't a woman be more like a man?" because he finds himself very loveable. Higgens wasn't a homosexual, but he pegged their issue. Why bother to make the changes and sacrifices necessary to love someone very unlike you when you can hook up with someone easy to get along with and get your sexual jollies with far less effort?

Is it surprising that the extreme end of people who feel this way want to be worshipped by society?

Shalom.

44 posted on 08/05/2004 5:57:07 AM PDT by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mockingbird For Short
A one-word label. What would it be?

Intelligent.

Shalom.

45 posted on 08/05/2004 6:00:20 AM PDT by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mockingbird For Short
A one-word label. What would it be?

I am leaning toward homonausic.

46 posted on 08/05/2004 6:17:20 AM PDT by LTCJ (God Save the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun; EdReform; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
- Homosexual Agenda PING -

Jaysun here says it best -

Imagine for a moment if a large number of people that participated in orgies formed a coalition and began demanding the same things that gays demand. Suppose that they demanded to be protected from losing their jobs for being orgy people, demanded that Universities admit a certain number of orgy people, and claimed that they were being discriminated against by virtue of the fact that our current marriage laws aren't well suited to them. Perhaps they'd start a few cable television shows. Maybe they'd write books describing the great number of things that orgy people of the past have contributed to our society. You get the picture.

An "orgy people" movement would be a joke in present day America. People would instantly see it as absurd as a "missionary position" movement, a "masturbation" movement, the "sex on every other Tuesday" (the group to which I presently belong) movement. The general public would quickly squash the "gay" movement if they stopped to look at what classifies someone as "gay." That is, to have sex with someone of the same sex (a sexual act).

Somehow, the general public has to come to see homosexuality for what it is: A sexual act that no more deserves special recognition than any other sexual act.

*Applause*

(If you want on or off this ping list, please FReepmail me.)

*Do not exceed 80 posts in 24 hours. Take 2 posts with water. Dosage may be repeated every 6 minutes as needed.*

47 posted on 08/05/2004 6:27:19 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow (1xy1xx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
"They want to be worshipped and when we refuse to pat them on the back we are met with their ire. Perhaps it is unavoidable that I am their enemy, but they certainly are not mine."

Because they have made heterosexuals their enemy, are intolerant and are forcing their agenda down our and our children's throats, gays have made themselves our enemy.

48 posted on 08/05/2004 8:15:00 AM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (Vote for anyone but Darlin' Arlen in November.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Actually, the above is true of the leftist agenda in general, and is something I have understood since, at the very least, my highschool days.

If there was doubt, Roe v. Wade made it crystal clear.

This reality sparked my keen interest in the pro-life and conservative movements, as well as in politics in college and spawned many sacrifices from myself and my family, for the betterment of our nation.

For those of you who are new to the cause (within the last ten or so years), I welcome you.

Please keep the articles coming.

49 posted on 08/05/2004 9:25:13 AM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (Vote for anyone but Darlin' Arlen in November.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
" Just keep feeding them the line that gays are neat, clean, effeminate shopaholics, and the folks will continue to say to themselves: There's nothing to see here, let's just move along."

What they do is put their private parts into each others' fecal matter and mouths. Harsh, I know, but that's the truth of the matter.

50 posted on 08/05/2004 9:35:23 AM PDT by subterfuge (Liberalism is, as liberalism does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Nicholas Stix, Same-Sex Marriage Activists Have Launched a Religious War

"Why are gay activists so intent on forcing Christianity to submit to them? Because Christianity is foundational to America, and they want to replace America’s foundations with those of their own choosing. And because Christianity condemns sodomy, and gay activists will not abide being told, 'No.' Theirs is a totalitarian will. They will have their way, even if it means having the Bible censored, and remaking God in their own image."

51 posted on 08/05/2004 11:49:06 AM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

Great article!


52 posted on 08/05/2004 11:56:21 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow (1xy1xx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow

I'm glad you liked it.


53 posted on 08/06/2004 12:58:37 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson