To: RUCKUS INC.
It's not a belief. It had to do with organization and order. Something with more moving parts would have more degrees of freedom. More degrees of freedom implies more possible configurations at any given time which would lend itself to a stochastic approach.
128 posted on
07/30/2004 5:01:20 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
Here is the thing, I believe in God, however, God did not just create us. He created a vast universe and to say we are alone is pure BS. The same people with same belief also claimed that the Earth was the center of the universe or the Earth is flat. We don't have the technology to find a Earth like planet yet. Once we do have the technology we will find other planets that is like Earth.
129 posted on
07/30/2004 5:52:24 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: RightWhale
"Something with more moving parts would have more degrees of freedom. More degrees of freedom implies more possible configurations at any given time which would lend itself to a stochastic approach"
So a watch (more moving parts) is more likely a result of chance than a tombstone? Obviously both items had a designer... Why does your theory hold true? Because you can back it up by saying stochastic approach? I think you know that the route of the argument is that you don't admit the existence of a creator, therefore you theorize from that point of reference.
173 posted on
08/02/2004 8:52:04 AM PDT by
RUCKUS INC.
("Wow, what a crapweasel." - Frank_Discussion)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson