"Something with more moving parts would have more degrees of freedom. More degrees of freedom implies more possible configurations at any given time which would lend itself to a stochastic approach"
So a watch (more moving parts) is more likely a result of chance than a tombstone? Obviously both items had a designer... Why does your theory hold true? Because you can back it up by saying stochastic approach? I think you know that the route of the argument is that you don't admit the existence of a creator, therefore you theorize from that point of reference.
The other choice is organic. Stochastic or organic.