Posted on 07/28/2004 1:25:12 PM PDT by BraveMan
Chicago — The science-fiction-like prospect of planting chips inside the human body took on a decidedly real flavor last week, in the wake of an admission by the Mexican Attorney General that he and 160 government officials have been "chipped."
Applied Digital Solutions Inc., maker of the so-called VeriChips that were used, acknowledged that its distributor sold the chips to the Mexican government late last year. The Palm Beach, Fla., company then added fuel to the firestorm by saying that it is also working with banks, credit card companies, hospitals, medical clinics and security agencies to spread the concept further.
The news generated heated response among privacy advocates, financial analysts and security experts. "Promoting implanted RFID devices as a security measure is downright loco," said privacy advocate Katherine Albrecht, founder and director of Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering (Caspian). Albrecht argued in a prepared statement that the announcement was a political maneuver by the Mexican authorities that would not help promote personal security in any way.
Still, security experts said last week that the move could be a precursor to a much larger trend toward "chipping" of humans over the next 20 years.
"In a decade or two, there will be a commonly available system with the ability to know who people are, where they are and what they've done," said John L. Peterson, a futurist and security expert with the Arlington Institute (Washington), and a former member of the National Security Council staff. "It's inevitable that something like this will happen. With terrorism, the external pressures are too great for it not to happen."
Beyond security Indeed, it was the threat of security breaches that prompted Mexican officials to use the technology in the first place. Attorney General Rafael Macedo de la Concha told reporters earlier this month that 160 employees of his office were using the implanted chips as a means to enter and exit secure government facilities in Mexico City.
Antonio Aceves, general director of Solusat Corp. (Mexico City), the distributor that sold the chips to the Mexican government, acknowledged that chips had been implanted, but said he had signed a nondisclosure agreement barring any further discussion of the details. "We can say only that the attorney general and 160 employees have VeriChips in their bodies," Aceves told EE Times.
Other, unverified news reports said that members of the Mexican military and police, as well as employees in the office of President Vincente Fox, might also be "chipped" in the next few months.
Executives at Applied Digital Solutions said Mexico's use of the chip could be the tip of a very large technological iceberg. The VeriChip Division, which has struggled over the past two years and had annual revenue of just $550,000 in 2003, is working at getting the chip accepted by regulatory agencies, doctors and hospitals, as well as banks, credit card companies, security agencies and even gun manufacturers.
A capsule-like RFID device first used in animals, the VeriChip is small enough, at 11 x 2 mm, to be injected through a syringe and implanted in a variety of locations within the human body. It includes a memory that holds 128 characters of identification information, an electromagnetic coil for transmitting data and a tuning capacitor, all encapsulated in a silicone-and-glass enclosure. The passive RF unit, which operates at 125 kHz, is activated by moving a company-designed scanner a few inches from the chip. Doing so excites the coil and "wakes up" the chip, enabling it to transmit data.
Applied Digital, which sells 3 million to 4 million chips into the animal market annually, sold only about 7,000 VeriChips for human applications last year. Still, the company continues to advance its technology, apparently in expectation of a larger market eventually opening up.
Applied Digital is working on doubling the device's memory size to 256 characters and is developing read/write capabilities for it, said Peter Zhou, vice president and chief technology scientist. The read/write capabilities would open up another broad swath of potential applications, he said, particularly in the health care market, where the chip could be used to carry continuously updated medical information.
"We believe that medical applications will be the primary source for getting the chip into society," said Scott Silverman, chairman and CEO of Applied Digital Solutions. "After that, people will be able to use the chip to do other applications as well."
The cylindrical device could soon be endowed with biometric sensors that would allow it to read temperature or glucose levels inside the body. The tiny glucose monitor would employ enzymes that react by producing a voltage proportional to glucose levels. Zhou said the company already makes the temperature sensor available to the animal market. He said the glucose monitor is being tested, but warned that neither has been approved for human use.
The company also said it is working on new antenna structures that would stretch the unit's sensing distance from a few inches to a few feet.
CEO Silverman believes the strongest driving force behind the technology may be the simple need for a device that can "speak" for patients. Used in conjunction with implantable pacemakers and defibrillators, as well as artificial hips and knees, the device could provide medical personnel with information the patient would be unlikely to know. It could contain, for example, data on the manufacturer of an implant, its serial number, recall information, who installed it, where it was installed and the date of its last battery charge.
"Information-gathering techniques in emergency rooms are archaic today," Silverman said. "This is a device that can do the talking for an incapacitated patient."
Scan my arm Applied Digital has also talked at length with banks and credit card companies about using the technology as a secondary form of authentication to help prevent credit card fraud, executives said last week. Under the company's plan, retailers would scan a chip in the customer's arm to authenticate identity.
"The banks and credit card companies we've talked to are extremely concerned about identity theft," Silverman said. "This would be one way for them to know that you are who you say you are."
The company said it has also talked with a South Carolina-based small-arms manufacturer about the possibility of using the technology in handguns for law enforcement agents. In such applications, a modified scanner in the gun handle would work in conjunction with an identification chip embedded in the palm of a police officer's hand. If the scanner identified the officer, the gun could be fired. If no positive ID were made, the gun wouldn't work.
Applied Digital executives say that security applications, like those in the Mexican government, could also kick-start the technology's rise. Initial targets include federal buildings, power plants, military bases and prisons.
To address personal-security issues, company researchers have also recently completed an implantable prototype unit that combines global-positioning satellite technology with a cell phone, identification chip and a battery. The unit employs GPS as a locator, then uses the cell phone to transmit a signal. The device, which measures 1.25 x 0.5 inch, could be surgically inserted beneath a user's collarbone.
Applied Digital executives believe the GPS-based technology would be especially appropriate in locales like Central and South America, where kidnappings are reportedly reaching epidemic proportions. Authorities in those areas, in an apparent attempt to stem the problem, are increasingly considering RFID solutions.
"In Mexico, we have more than 150,000 missing kids," said Aceves of Solusat. "When you're looking at so much kidnapping, privacy concerns become less important."
Privacy advocates, however, predict that the use of RFID will backfire, with grotesque consequences. "When someone steals a car, the first thing they do is disarm the locator device," said Albrecht of Caspian. "So who's to say that a kidnapper won't want to disarm a locator device? The idea of a kidnapper probing underneath the collarbone is frightening."
Indeed, news reports suggest that such a scenario may already be occurring. Mexican authorities are said to have recently broken up a ring of kidnappers, known as "Los Chips," who searched their victims to see if they were carrying chips that could help them to be located.
Industry analysts said last week that they don't expect the sale of implantable chips for humans to take off any time soon. Animal-tracking systems, which have grown into a business that is estimated at more than $70 million per year, are set for more growth in the wake of mad-cow disease scares. But consumers, not surprisingly, have resisted the idea of having chips implanted in their own bodies.
"If people don't want RFID tags in their underwear or in their designer clothes, why would they ever want them under their skin?" said Mike Liard, an RFID analyst for Venture Development Corp. (Natick, Mass.).
Still, security experts believe that over the next decade, chips for humans, or some variation thereof, will emerge as a market. The looming threat of terrorism and the advent of such diseases as SARS will spark a demand for tracking and identification technologies.
"The technology will insidiously insert itself into the system, first in smaller ways, then in larger ways, until people get used to it," said Peterson of the Arlington Institute. "Then it will become a common and easy way to establish identity."
Terror-related issues will likely push the technology to the forefront more quickly than would otherwise happen, Peterson added. "If a nuclear weapon goes off in some major city, there will be extraordinary pressure to figure out ways to keep it from happening again."
Indeed, "RFID chips in humans are still a long way off and no one really knows what will happen in that market," said Erik Michielsen, director of RFID and ubiquitous networks for Allied Business Intelligence Inc. (Oyster Bay, N.Y.). "But you can never say never."
Keep your eye on this culprit.
Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., House Democratic Whip.
Earned income: $150,000.
Honoraria, all donated to charity: None.
Major assets: Pension fund, $250,001-$500,000; Digital Angel stock, $1,001-$15,000; credit union account, $1,001-$15,000.
Applied Digital is the majority owner of Digital Angel (which in turn is the patent holder of the Verichip.)
I can't see the government forcing people to put something in them, in what amounts to invasive surgery. The Civil Libertarians already are a bit snarky about lesser invasions of one's privacy. I can see them positively livid about chipping people.
AND... GPS will not read indoors. You have to be under open sky. The unit would have to be always-on so it could take GPS readings whenever it could, then use dead reckoning in the dead spots.
When I opened my current bank account, I asked them if I had to give them my SSN. They said yes, it was federal law. I checked, they were right.
My credit card company wouldn't give me one without one, same with my cell phone co., my utilities, driver's license, unemployment benefits, insurance, etc. You have to give your SSN for a loan, credit card, utilities, insurance, etc., so they can do a credit check...which identifies you by SSN.
Almost any financial or govt institution that you do business with requires a SSN to verify your identity, anyone that says otherwise is blowing BS.
Your reply 16 just about sums it up.
Vaccines, for a century.
High premiums to those who are not chipped.
not being chipped could see one classified as high risk.
Currently they are not allowed to do so, they can only store company issued number, not actual medical info. This move would change that, and hold large implications for healthcare, especially given government's aggressive movements into healthcare.
I'm sorry I can't find the link. I did a FR search to no avail.
The data would not be on the chip. The medical database would be at a separate location.
Currently they are not allowed to do so, they can only store company issued number, not actual medical info.
The FDA has approved the Verichip for use in identification and financial transactions. The current "de novo" review is to insure that the medical database meets FDA approval for security, accuracy, etc.
Thanks for the info.
You appear to be concerned and knowledgable about this issue. Have you any thoughts about how to avoid being chipped or effective opposition to chipping in general?
What do you predict in 10 years, 20, 50?
I believe that the implementation will be voluntary. Recent polls on the Verichip indicate an 80% nonacceptance rate (for US citizens polled). Watch for lots of slick Madison Avenue-type PR to slowly convert public opinion.
Assume that the Verichip will someday be required for all forms of commercial medicine & commerce. Then, prepare for alternative means of satisfying your needs.
Become as self reliant as possible. Arrange for barter networks with like-minded folks.
What do you predict in 10 years, 20, 50?
If you pull up the FR New Years prediction thread, you'll see that mine aren't worth very much.
: )
Just know your opposition & be prepared.
Then adapt, improvise and overcome.
Is Digital Angel satillite GPS capable?.....or soon on the future?
Speak of the devil....
They have a product in development known as the PLD (personal locating device). It is said to be an implantable GPS device approximately the size of a zippo lighter.
They are working on decreasing the size.
It is not yet commercially available. The time frame for beta testing, seeking FDA approval and marketing it has not been made public.
A unit known as Digital Angel, a GPS device worn on the wrist in conjunction with a pager sized unit worn on the belt is no longer in development and there are no plans to market it.
Thanks!
Good point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.