1 posted on
07/25/2004 5:34:07 AM PDT by
NYer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp IV; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ..
The Roman Catholic Church warned some thirty years ago that in vitro procedures would turn the human person into a commodity. But even the Church never imagined that the conception of new life would be treated as a media spectacle. "Finally, careful consideration should be given to the danger of this power passing into the hands of those public authorities who care little for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government which in its attempt to resolve the problems affecting an entire country resorts to the same measures as are regarded as lawful by married people in the solution of a particular family difficulty? Who will prevent public authorities from favoring those contraceptive methods which they consider more effective? Should they regard this as necessary, they may even impose their use on everyone. It could well happen, therefore, that when people, either individually or in family or social life, experience the inherent difficulties of the divine law and are determined to avoid them, they may give into the hands of public authorities the power to intervene in the most personal and intimate responsibility of husband and wife."
HUMANAE VITAE
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
2 posted on
07/25/2004 5:36:22 AM PDT by
NYer
(When you have done something good, remember the words "without Me you can do nothing." (John 15:5).)
To: NYer
1,000 men, this might set a record for a circle j-rk.
4 posted on
07/25/2004 5:43:33 AM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Liberals are like catfish ( all mouth and no brains )(bottom feeders))
To: NYer
Someone should inform the men that, as the father, they will be financially responsible for the child for the next 20+ years.
5 posted on
07/25/2004 5:45:29 AM PDT by
Puddleglum
(Kerry sez life begins at conception, yet he supports abortion. Is he evil, lying, or insane?)
To: NYer
The program will start with 1000 volunteers who will be selected by the woman on the basis of sex appeal, wealth, fitness and personality. The woman, who is not named, will take fertility drugs to stimulate the production of ova. One will be selected and fertilized by the winning man's sperm by IVF clinicians live on television. The likelihood is that the idea will not pan out for practical reasons. The best IVF clinics in the world can boast, at most, a 15-25% success rate. The producers have approached German television broadcasters who they thing will be more receptive to the idea. So I guess a guy selected from 1000 for 'sex appeal, wealth, fitness and personality' would be an übermensch. I can understand why German TV might be interested. Imagine if we could create an entire race of such people. Why, you could call it a master race! Mein Führer, I can walk!
6 posted on
07/25/2004 5:48:49 AM PDT by
Right Wing Professor
(John Edwards: Qualifications? we don' need no steenkin' qualifications!)
To: NYer
Reality TV has caused me to curtail my television viewing by probably 80% at my house; However, my girlfriend added the western channel at her place so my television viewing there is up 80%.....It's a break even.
7 posted on
07/25/2004 5:50:46 AM PDT by
Rebelbase
( A majority of Europeans have lost the courage of their fathers and grandfathers.)
To: NYer
Reality Show to Feature 1000 Men Competing to Impregnate Woman without SexWhat're they planning on doing??!?? Smearing 'man jelly' on the doorknobs??!??
9 posted on
07/25/2004 5:52:54 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: NYer; Happy2BMe
10 posted on
07/25/2004 5:55:23 AM PDT by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: NYer
What about Make Me a Dad? Oh, never mind.
To: NYer
on the basis of sex appeal, wealth, fitness and personality.That explains why I didn't get a call.
12 posted on
07/25/2004 5:56:10 AM PDT by
Tijeras_Slim
(Be a Dollar a Day FReeper, and SMILE when you get your Mastercard bill!)
To: Happy2BMe
13 posted on
07/25/2004 5:56:20 AM PDT by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: NYer
Reality Show to Feature 1000 Men Competing to Impregnate Woman without Sex And what, exactly, is the fun in that?
To: NYer
"A spokesman for the BBC has already said, 'It is absolutely not for the BBC.'"What pathetic pretensions.
Perhaps a few decades ago, when the BBC was respected throughout the world...but today's BBC?! What a joke!
18 posted on
07/25/2004 6:21:41 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(9/11 was never repeated. Thank you, President Bush.)
To: ValerieUSA
The Daily Mail has called the idea "sick" and "depraved."
IVF? Nah... it would be sick and depraved if 1000 men tried to impregnate one woman after first getting her drunk.
19 posted on
07/25/2004 6:34:01 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
To: NYer
Just take a look at this excerpt of the contestant list:
127. Bill Clinton
198. Billy Clinton
209. William Clinton
314. Will Clinton
447. Billy Jeff Blythe
478. William Blythe
656. Clinton, William Jefferson
757. Bill Al Gore
813. Monica Lewinsky
20 posted on
07/25/2004 6:43:30 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Sandy, is that a top secret document in your pants or are you just happy to see me?)
To: NYer
This proposed show is almost as bad as it gets. There are however some changes they would have to do to make it 100% politically correct:
1. Use only gays as the sperm donors.
2. Recruit two lesbians to be impregnated.
3. Have the viewers vote on which woman will undergo a late-term abortion.
4. The surviving baby is adopted by two men who are "married" to each other and who have AIDS.
If they make these changes, it will represent all of the "family values" that the left holds dear -- there will be no way that a leftist politician will dare to criticize it.
21 posted on
07/25/2004 7:00:56 AM PDT by
Wilhelm Tell
(Lurking since 1997!)
To: NYer
27 posted on
07/25/2004 7:15:54 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: NYer
Impregnate Woman without Sex What a topsy turvy world. Any normal man would be trying to have sex without impregnating the woman. This is all down-side, and no up-side.
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
29 posted on
07/25/2004 7:30:59 AM PDT by
mhking
(John Kerry & Al Gore: Cut from the same tree.)
To: NYer
A swimming pool 'accident'...
30 posted on
07/25/2004 8:23:07 AM PDT by
traumer
To: NYer
Children without sex? I thought that was called "marriage." :-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson