SANDY'S SLOPPY SIDE LET HIM DOWN (known to history as a man undone by his own hosiery)

NY POST ^ | PHILIP RECCHIA

[Liz]

........his mother supported the family through their Army-Navy surplus store......

Aha, so that's where Berger learned his MO since he lifted secret documents in the manner of a cheap crook shoplifting underwear at Wal-Mart.

[csvset]

To this day, he begins each week by compiling an extensive to-do list.

Steal documents.. Get caught.. Get next assignment fron Hillary boss...

[Jeff Chandler]

The entire Clinton whitehouse was sloppy. Why, Al gore was know as "Sloppy Second in Command".

[Liz]

As each day passes with this scandal, the entire Clintonoid colony appears to be even more abysmal than we could have ever imagined.

Makes you eonder how this Pantload Berger got auch an important job in our gov't and what exactly he was doing in the runup to 9/11.

To think our safety was in his filthy hands.


One thing is clear....none of these Clintoids had any respect for US law whatsoever.

They are truly frightening and Berger is the scariest of the lot......so far.

[Liz]

I think "CYA" was right at the top of the list for him.

[ambrose]

Clintoon was sloppy... just look at Monica's dress.

[onyx]

ALL of your comments are superb and have me laughing.

When the video of his thievery is made public, THEN
maybe voting Americans will see the seriousness of his
callous acts and better understand the reasons 9/11 could
have been thwarted by taking-out OBL.

[Liz]

Predictably, Clinton defended this Pantload saying everybody who knew the guy in the WH always saw him "buried in papers."

That sends a chill up the spine of every patriotic American.

If under scrutiny at the Ntl Archives, Berger stole secret documents, one can only wonder what he did to compromise ntl security in the "anything goes" Clinton-era WH.

[aruanan]

When he worked for Clinton, Berger never set foot outside the White House without two cellphones, lest one fail. And his West Wing desk sported half a dozen "in" boxes, to prevent documents from becoming lost in the stacks.

Gee, this sounds like someone who took precautions to counteract any possibilities that clutter or sloppiness or inadvertent bad luck (cell phone going out) should prevent him from carrying out his duties.

Just what was his duty in going in to retrieve higher than top-secret documents and who tasked him with it?

[sgtbono2002]

I keep seeing Posts that refer Berger to Clinton, and indeed he was, but think for a moment of how many of these Clintonoids will be back in power under Kerry. Thats is the frightening part, A Kerry administration will return all these folks to office.

[mrtysmm]

".... one can only wonder what he did to compromise ntl security in the "anything goes" Clinton-era WH."

What a scary thought. The main question that must be answered....is 'who asked him to do this and why'....

[syriacus]

Throw the book at Berger

[Ben Hecks]

"Clinton pardoned Deutch as he was about to plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge stemming from a probe of 17,000 pages of classified documents found on his home computer."

This might suggest that Berger is guilty only of a misdemeanor rather than a felony which can (according to someone on another thread) carry a ten year prison sentence. The fact that Clinton is trying to laugh this off tells me even more about his serious lack of character.

[eno_]

one can only wonder what he did to compromise ntl security in the "anything goes" Clinton-era WH

In the Clinton era the government was run by old campus radicals. Crypto-Communists. Red daiper babies. "Treason is the reason" is not just a slogan. These people were doing it.

[catpuppy]

Socks? If Sandy had been smart he would have worn hip waders.

[sd-joe]

Why, Al gore was know as "Sloppy Second in Command".

And we all know how bad "sloppy seconds" can be.

[hoosiermama]

NAW! Let him plea bargain and throw the book at those who put him up to it.

[cyncooper]

Timeline as reported by the WaPo is not agreed upon by the two parties: The Berger camp and the investigating camp. Why the dispute has to do with this "inadvertant" nonsense.

The investigators say the employees first noticed docs missing after a September visit to the archives. This is when they called Bruce Lindsey to inform him (as he was the Clinton administration liaison to the archives) that the docs would need to be returned. This, the Berger camp denies. They deny the call and that Berger was aware docs were missing at that time.

Next visit by Berger to the archives was early October. Employees do sting and this is when they reportedly observe him deliberately concealing documents upon his person. They later contacted him directly, he calls them back claiming he "found" the documents, employees go to his house directly the next morning to retrieve.

Berger then hires Lanny Breuer and subsequently "finds" 40-50 pages of notes that he had been taking since July (the basis for the claim that "this story is a year old!!"). And remember, the Berger camp admits that he "knowingly" took the notes out of the archives contrary to the rules.

I don't appreciate articles that lend a tone of credence to his ludicrous "sloppy" or "inadvertant" excuse. Especially when we are constantly treated to a tone of skepticism about everything Bush, even though time and again HE is proven to have told the truth. Berger here is clearly lying and I'd appreciate it if the majority acted that way. (All of this not directed at you, Liz. I know YOU have a brain in your head and eyes to see and ears to hear)

[San Jacinto]

The old "He's honest, but sloppy" defense. Next time berger is in TV, they will make sure he has gravy on his tie and the collar of his shirt is up in the air.