Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Marshals Say Passenger Overreacted (NW flight)
KFI News ^ | July 22, 2004 | Eric Leonard

Posted on 07/24/2004 4:05:17 PM PDT by HostileTerritory

Undercover federal air marshals on board a June 29 Northwest airlines flight from Detroit to LAX identified themselves after a passenger, “overreacted,” to a group of middle-eastern men on board, federal officials and sources have told KFI NEWS.

The passenger, later identified as Annie Jacobsen, was in danger of panicking other passengers and creating a larger problem on the plane, according to a source close to the secretive federal protective service.

Jacobsen, a self-described freelance writer, has published two stories about her experience at womenswallstreet.com, a business advice web site designed for women.

“The lady was overreacting,” said the source. “A flight attendant was told to tell the passenger to calm down; that there were air marshals on the plane.”

The middle eastern men were identified by federal agents as a group of touring musicians travelling to a concert date at a casino, said Air Marshals spokesman Dave Adams.

Jacobsen wrote she became alarmed when the men made frequent trips to the lavatory, repeatedly opened and closed the overhead luggage compartments, and appeared to be signaling each other.

“Initially it was brought to [the air marshals] attention by a passenger,” Adams said, adding the agents had been watching the men and chose to stay undercover.

Jacobsen and her husband had a number of conversations with the flight attendants and gestured towards the men several times, the source said.

“In concert with the flight crew, the decision was made to keep [the men] under surveillance since no terrorist or criminal acts were being perpetrated aboard the aircraft; they didn’t interfere with the flight crew,” Adams said.

The air marshals did, however, check the bathrooms after the middle-eastern men had spent time inside, Adams said.

FBI agents met the plane when it landed in Los Angeles and the men were questioned, and Los Angeles field office spokeswoman Cathy Viray said it’s significant the alarm on the flight came from a passenger.

“We have to take all calls seriously, but the passenger was worried, not the flight crew or the federal air marshals,” she said. “The complaint did not stem from the flight crew.”

Several people were questioned, she said, but no one was detained.

Jacobsen’s husband Kevin told KFI NEWS he approached a man he thought was an air marshal after the flight had landed.

“You made me nervous,” Kevin said the air marshal told him.

“I was freaking out,” Kevin replied.

“We don’t freak out in situations like this,” the air marshal responded.

Federal agents later verified the musicians’ story.

“We followed up with the casino,” Adams said. A supervisor verified they were playing a concert. A second federal law enforcement source said the concert itself was monitored by an agent.

“We also went to the hotel, determined they had checked into the hotel,” Adams said. Each of the men were checked through a series of databases and watch-lists with negative results, he said.

The source said the air marshals on the flight were partially concerned Jacobsen’s actions could have been an effort by terrorists or attackers to create a disturbance on the plane to force the agents to identify themselves.

Air marshals’ only tactical advantage on a flight is their anonymity, the source said, and Jacobsen could have put the entire flight in danger.

“They have to be very cognizant of their surroundings,” spokesman Adams confirmed, “to make sure it isn’t a ruse to try and pull them out of their cover.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: California; US: Michigan; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aircraft; airlinesecurity; airmarshals; airplane; anniejacobson; bathroom; bomb; expiredvisas; lamemarshals; musicians; syria; terror; terrorism; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-392 next last
To: ValerieUSA

...or the suspicious Middle Eastern men?!


141 posted on 07/24/2004 6:32:09 PM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

>>“A flight attendant was told to tell the passenger to calm down; that there were air marshals on the plane.” <<

Nice to know you may be caught in a cross fire or flaming wreckage. . .at least you knew Air marshal's were there.

Why not just chill and take a nap. . .Air Marshal's (undercover) are there to stop anything from starting.

Right. . .


142 posted on 07/24/2004 6:33:08 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Half Vast Conspiracy
Obviously, I can't go out and investigate this. Neither can you. That is what the media does.

That's an insane statement or chillingly too child-like. Again: grow up. Get some counseling.

I can, you can, any one with the mental capacity to post on this site can investigate this, and I know the media doesn't -- the media is paid to SELL YOU GOODS AND SERVICES. And good for them in doing that.

But it is an absolutely insane or childish view to think that they are great, thorough, complete, wise and honest investigators. They are not. They do "investigations" sure -- you can do better -- you don't have to suppress information, filter it, color it to favor this thing or that. They do. They MUST. It's a simple reason why. It's called BUSINESS.

They're "investigations" must not drive away either their customers nor their "cattle". You and I are their cattle -- they feed us images and ideas that move us into the pens of the market where our wallets are slaughtered for their customers. Of course we get our "feed" and are usually, most always happy to buy what the ads suggest to us. But this does not make the media "investigators". They don't even have the power of supeona! Yet you and I do -- through our elected agents called DA's, or through ourselves when we set on grand juries, or through committees of inquiry convened by our legislative bodies, or by ourselves when we sue and get to a court proceeding in that suit.

143 posted on 07/24/2004 6:36:54 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

well let me tell you, if we have to allow 28 uses of the lavatory to clean for prayers, and to eat "outlawed" food in the lavatory, all in the name of tolerance for Islam - then its over. we might as well just cancel the air marshall program all together. you can't allow a hole in the system that big, and then not expect that a real terrorist who wants to use the lavatory to assemble a device to take down the plane - now has a blank check to do so because we have to tolerate the fact that he may be cleaning for prayers and eating "outlawed" food.


144 posted on 07/24/2004 6:36:55 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
>>According to the lady's article, she saw them passing items (such as the McDonald's bag) around, etc.<<

Acting strange and all. . .perhaps trolling for a lawsuit against the airlines/Air Marshal's. . heck, testing security and crew and passenger reactions AND win big bucks while doing so (if they were in any way "profiled"). . .
145 posted on 07/24/2004 6:37:49 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Back to square one. My following point was that comparing the two stories is silly. One is in the past. We all know how it turned out. This one is developing. We don’t know all of the facts. When I read Jacobsen’s version it seemed to be filled with an inordinate level of detail…detail aimed at her perception of what was going on. It read like she had an overactive imagination. That’s my judgment for now.

Did you every figure which statement was true?

146 posted on 07/24/2004 6:39:59 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (If the Rapture is coming, should I insist on a non-Christian pilot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: TravisABQ
>>This does not pass the smell test. Were they checking the bathrooms because they thought she was "overreacting"? <,

Having flown many flights into/out-f of the ME, and having spent much time in the region. . .I am not sure these guys even know how to USE a bathroom. . .that would explain not passing the smell test.
147 posted on 07/24/2004 6:40:53 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TravisABQ
>>This does not pass the smell test. Were they checking the bathrooms because they thought she was "overreacting"? <,

Having flown many flights into/out-of the ME, and having spent much time in the region. . .I am not sure these guys even know how to USE a bathroom. . .that would explain not passing the smell test.
148 posted on 07/24/2004 6:41:04 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Well, that about MacD bag was just a jibe. However, there are serious details in the story which no one seems to notice.

For instance, why all the background, working place and hotel checks on the A-rab gang were performed ONLY AFTER THE LADY'D MADE THE FUSS?

Surely the air marshals should be able to calm down the situation conveying to a disturbed passenger or any whistle-blower that there was nothing to worry about - the group had been screened BEFORE getting pass for the flight.

But they obviously didn't have any foreknowledge on the 14 strong group of potential shoe-bombers...

149 posted on 07/24/2004 6:43:48 PM PDT by Neophyte (Nazists, Communists, Islamists... what the heck is the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: glockmeister40
"If the TSA really wanted to protect people they would not let any arabs on any flight."

You got it, GM.

150 posted on 07/24/2004 6:44:35 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Do you want to name call of discuss this?

OK. I'm gonna bite. How have you personally investigated this? What facts have you verified?

151 posted on 07/24/2004 6:45:33 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (If the Rapture is coming, should I insist on a non-Christian pilot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Lady ... It is every soul on that plane's LIFE. Jobs are here today, gone tommorrow, another one Wednesday. Life is not recoverable.

Dude.... explain how that little platitude helps us.

152 posted on 07/24/2004 6:45:51 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (~*-,._.,-*~Loves her hubbit~*-,._.,-*~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Can anyone comprehend, that in 1944, just 3 years after the attack on PEARL HARBOR that we allow 10 Japanese Foriegn nationals with expired visas flying around our nation and everyone saying "NO PROBLEM".

Just stop the racial profiling PLEASE!!

153 posted on 07/24/2004 6:49:20 PM PDT by PISANO (NEVER FORGET 911 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Well. . .maybe. . .if they lined up in the aisle and put their collective butts in the air.
154 posted on 07/24/2004 6:50:22 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Neophyte

OK, but wouldn't carrying a bulging Ronald McDonald bag past his buddies give his non-halal habits away?


155 posted on 07/24/2004 6:50:54 PM PDT by jwalburg (Hatriots for Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
As I reply to this, there are 116 replies and I've not read any of them and this might have been addresses.

Personally, I don't think Annie Jacobson was being paranoid. From the news reports, hers isn't the only unusual airline story lately.

First, the airlines didn't follow regulations regarding the number of passengers congregating at the rest rooms and around the emergency exits.

Second, though Mrs. Jacobson wouldn't have known this at the time, I have read elsewhere that the Syrians visas had expired.

Third, just because the "musicians" had legit jobs doesn't mean they weren't checking out the aircraft security or weren't about to set off a bomb or hijack the aircraft.

We are at war, whether we chose to accept it or not. As has been said many, many times. They are at war with us, even if we aren't at war with them. In a post 9/11 world, better to err on the side of caution, even paranoia, than to have another 9/11 like event.

Hindsight is 20/20, but only for those who live long enough to look back. If we step on a few toes protecting ourselves, then we can say we're are sorry once the plane has landed.

156 posted on 07/24/2004 6:50:54 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
Your note about ME toilet-times reminded me of the day I stupidly got on board a TEE in Deutschland only to discover that all the cars had just recently emptied out hundreds of "guest workers" from Turkish Kurdistan in Nurnburg.

Wow! The Prophet seemed to have missed something in his instructions to the faithful.

157 posted on 07/24/2004 6:51:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Half Vast Conspiracy
When you are toothless your "bite" is meaningless.

You've already set your mind one way on this -- that is obvious from your first post. You want comfort -- any comfort. In this case the specific comfort in the continuantion of assurance that "things are being taken care of" by magically trustworthy people. I WILL NOT and CAN NOT give you such false comfort.

And YOU have set yourself to only take comfort from some mommy-analogue. THAT, I can not be. You have set this course -- turned yourself off. ONLY YOU can turn yourself back on -- can become an adult.

I can, however, assure you most kindly and with compassion -- that you can do it. You can do it on your own. Take one step and others will help you take the next. (Most times, no guarentees. Sometimes a person gets so far into the muck and mire he or she has to take quite a few steps, a few lonely steps outwards and upwards.)

Anyway, by the hair of your teeth if you have to -- pull yourself up. You can do it!

158 posted on 07/24/2004 6:56:21 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Bwashhh. . .coke all over my computer.

Funny.


159 posted on 07/24/2004 6:57:38 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

You put jobs -- the air marshalls job's, that is some sort of deferential respect for their jobs -- ahead of her concern for her own life. That is wrong. Dead wrong in some cases we can easily imagine based on actual experiences -- such as Flight 587, Flight 63, Flight 93.


160 posted on 07/24/2004 7:00:11 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson