Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Contact Within 20 Years: Shostak
Space Daily ^ | Mountain View CA (SPX) Jul 22, 2004

Posted on 07/23/2004 9:15:08 PM PDT by ckilmer

EXO WORLDS

First Contact Within 20 Years: Shostak

Will the 20s see ET roar onto center stage Mountain View CA (SPX) Jul 22, 2004 If Intelligent life exists elsewhere in our galaxy, advances in computer processing power and radio telescope technology will ensure we detect their transmissions within two decades. That's the bold prediction from a leading light at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute in Mountain View, California. Seth Shostak, the SETI Institute's senior astronomer, based his prediction on accepted assumptions about the likelihood of alien civilisations existing, combined with projected increases in computing power.

Shostak, whose calculations will be published in a forthcoming edition of the space science journal Acta Astronautica, first estimated the number of alien civilisations in our galaxy that might currently be broadcasting radio signals.

For this he used a formula created in 1961 by astronomer Frank Drake which factors in aspects such the number of stars with planets, how many of those planets might be expected to have life, and so on. Shostak came up with an estimate of between 10,000 and 1 million radio transmitters in the galaxy.

To find them will involve observing and inspecting radio emissions from most of the galaxy's 100 billion stars. The time necessary for this formidable task can be estimated from the capabilities of planned radio telescopes- such as SETI's 1-hectare Allen Telescope Array and the internationally run Square Kilometre Array- and expected increases in the power of the microchips that sift through radio signals from space.

Shostak assumed that computer processing power will continue to double every 18 months until 2015- as it has done for the past 40 years. From then on, he assumes a more conservative doubling time of 36 months as transistors get too small to scale down as easily as they have till now.

Within a generation, radio emissions from enough stars will be observed and analysed to find the first alien civilisation, Shostak estimates. But because they will probably be between 200 and 1000 light years away, sending a radio message back will take centuries.

Paul Shuch, executive director of the SETI League, a separate organisation in New Jersey, says Shostak's prediction ignores one important factor. "It is altogether reasonable to project the development of human technology, based upon past trends and planned investments," he says.

"But predicting the date, the decade or even the century of contact is another matter because the 'other end' of the communications link is completely out of our hands. It would be nice to think we know something about the existence, distribution, technology and motivation of our potential communications partners in space, but in fact, we don't."

Shostak admits that there are myriad uncertainties surrounding his prediction, but he defends the basis on which he made it. "I have made this prediction using the assumptions adopted by the SETI research community itself."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: crevolist; extraterrestrial; shostak; space; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-322 next last
To: RadioAstronomer

Thanks for clearing that up. =o)


61 posted on 07/23/2004 11:14:46 PM PDT by GeronL (Time for a Constitutional Amendment banning Government giving money away to anyone or anything...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Yup. Coast to Coast is on now. I am listening to Linda Moulton Howe. :-)


62 posted on 07/23/2004 11:15:54 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
"As far as the tilt of our equatorial plane versus the glalactic plane, it was the initial plane of the accretion disk of the early formation of the solar system."

Yes, but for the plane of the accretion disk, and later our planets, to be *flat* presents a problem for GR's limit of nothing being able to exceed Light.

After all, it takes light less time to reach the inner circle of the accretion disk than to the outer rim of the disk. If Gravity was as slow as light, then that time lapse over that distance would mean first a curved accretion disk and then later the layered orbital planes of the revolving planets around the Sun...if the Sun was moving relative to where it was located 5 minutes ago, anyway.

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

63 posted on 07/23/2004 11:19:48 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Take a really good look at those links. They may be able to clear up some of your misconceptions.


64 posted on 07/23/2004 11:22:07 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

I luv this stuff. Hoagland lives out on a limb, but he is exceedingly bright. He was darned good during the Apollo landings.


65 posted on 07/23/2004 11:22:12 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I am listening right now as well :-)


66 posted on 07/23/2004 11:22:42 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
If they admit what we found the game is at an end.

New game. :)

67 posted on 07/23/2004 11:24:04 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Brookings: we can't handle the truth

Art Bell: we can individually handle the truth, but as a whole society will not handle the truth.

68 posted on 07/23/2004 11:27:16 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I heard that too. :-)

He is now talking about JPL. Well. I worked at JPL. :-)


69 posted on 07/23/2004 11:27:48 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I luv this stuff. Hoagland lives out on a limb, but he is exceedingly bright. He was darned good during the Apollo landings.

Isn't Hoagland the "face on Mars" kook?

70 posted on 07/23/2004 11:28:27 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mikegi

Yuppers. :-)


71 posted on 07/23/2004 11:29:44 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: mikegi

But still fun to listen too. :-)


72 posted on 07/23/2004 11:30:37 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

And one other question: Out of the whole radio spectrum, how do you know where to look?


73 posted on 07/23/2004 11:39:35 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Waco
First contact will not occur until 1947, sometime around July. Scoop! Scoop!

Mogul! Mogul!

74 posted on 07/23/2004 11:43:16 PM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Excellent question.

There are two real sources of noise that limits the radio astronomer's ability to search for very weak signals. 1) The Galactic noise halo interferes with us below 1GHz and noise due to earth's atmosphere interferes with us above 10GHz. This pretty much keeps all SETI searches (at least radio ones) between 1 and 10Ghz. Inside these two limits, the noise is around the 2.7K background from 1.4 to 7GHz. This is why most of the SETI searches are around the frequencies that the OH (hydroxyl) and H (hydrogen) molecules masers emit. This is the so-called water hole. OH H (tell me scientists don't have a sense of humor)


75 posted on 07/23/2004 11:46:02 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Unless you count Superman arriving in 1938 and Cornelius and Zira time-travelling backwards to 1971.

Hang around til 2019 for Roy and Pris.

"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Time to die. "

76 posted on 07/23/2004 11:51:11 PM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dread78645

Loved "Blade Runner" :-)


77 posted on 07/23/2004 11:52:12 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What would be the point of making such a prediction?

Shostak is trying to drum up interest and, I suppose, to highlight some of the reasons that 40 years of negative results should not discourage us. To address your usual concerns, RW, the discovery of ETs would make hash of the various space treaties (how could the UN claim collective ownership of the universe if part of it already belongs to someone else?). It would open the door to private property in space. We might even argue that the reasonable possibility of ETs has alone already invalidated some of the treaties.

78 posted on 07/23/2004 11:57:41 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (A few words for the media: Julius Streicher, follow his path, share his fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Oh, wow. I was invited to this dinner. Too bad I didn't go.


79 posted on 07/23/2004 11:57:43 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin; TomServo

41,898, as of this morning! What is the process for joining groups? If you don't mind my asking. I'll go check out the new Processor, BOINC! Blackbird.


80 posted on 07/24/2004 2:05:19 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson