Illinois Children's Mental Health Partnership
Posted on 07/23/2004 4:26:02 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
CHICAGO -- This week, a series of public forums on a program requiring all pregnant women and children through age 18 years to be tested for mental health needs is being held this week in five different locations statewide.
One group of parents learned about the state's plans to proceed with this program and on Monday issued an alarm asking for parents and citizens concerned about the new program to voice their opinions at the forums.
"We're moving toward social training over academic training with this program," Larry Trainor, a Mt. Prospect parent of four children and a contact for Citizens Commission on Human Rights, based in Los Angeles, said today.
"Since psychiatric involvement in education, SAT scores have gone down for the past few decades. Evaluating mental conditions is not based on scientific evidence, it's subjective," he said.
The $10 million plan for the setup of the Children's Mental Health Act of 2003 is being considered at this week's public forums starting Monday, July 18 in Champaign.
Signed into law, the bill passed the Illinois General Assembly last spring, sponsored in the House by State Representatives Julie Hamos (D-Evanston) and Patricia Bellock (R-Westmont). State Senator Maggie Crotty (D-Oak Forest) and Susan Garrett (D-Highwood) shepherded the legislation through the Senate.
The legislation passed the House with a 107 to 5 vote, and the Senate unanimously.
"What if they find a student has a math disorder, a reading disorder. Would that be a mental health disorder, one that would cause the parents to put their children with a drug for a condition they may or may not have?" Trainor asked.
The mental health program will develop a mental health system for "all children ages 0-18 years," provide for screening to "ensure appropriate and culturally relevant assessment of young children's social and emotional development with the use of standardized tools."
Also, all pregnant women will be screened for depression and thereafter following her baby's birth, up to one year. Follow-up treatment services will also be provided.
Trainor said that he is trying to get parents and citizens out to voice their opinion about the new program.
Apparently, children's mental health will be assessed along with their academic standards in the new proposed testing. The Illinois State Board of Education has been given the responsibility to develop the appropriate tests, according to last year's legislation.
The Task Force hosting the public forums this week are to send a recommendation to Governor Blagojevich by the end of the summer, according to the Act (HB 2900).
Developing story . . .
Wow! I just noticed the date on the article - 2004... Now I'll check the end of the thread and see if there have been any updates.
It did sound familiar.
You've got that right wolf24. Lower cost and maybe a higher accuracy rate from a palm reader.
On a number of topics. Getting really friggin' old...
It's an old article. The link goes nowhere. And I think three Freepers are just having some fun here. I promise to get some sleep before pinging the next time.
Post #95 does have a link to what appears to be the actual legislation passed as well as other info.
I have family obligations now, but as soon as I'm able, I'm moving to another state. Illinois sucks.
http://www.ivpa.org/childrensmhtf/pdf/ICMHTF_FinalReport2003_1.pdf
Children's Mental Health Task Force Report
I wonder if you can freep mail the Admin Mod and ask for the link in 149 to be added to your original post?
People are going to come to this thread, see the old date, click the article link, see bad request and assume this is a joke.
The PDF on 149 is what the article was sourcing.
Well, after a good night's sleep... :-) ...it appears this "article" links to nowhere, and some Freepers here indicated they're just having some fun.
Which is a tremendous relief!
Still, any legislation regarding "mental health screening" is something we all need to watch closely. (Thanks, Cal, for the other links).
And post 151 has made my point.
You need to read the thread.
Here's a reposting of that article with some additional commentary with links on it.
Keep you hands off my undies ;~)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177398/posts?page=148#148
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177398/posts?page=149#149
Thanks for that link, I've also updated the original link to the article, which seems to have been taken down.
I am quite capable of "assessing my child's social and emotional development" all by myself, thank you.
I would be fleeing that state so fast........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.