Posted on 07/22/2004 12:57:44 PM PDT by Cacique
ping
ping
LOL...I like him.
Congratulations, guys. Way to do the heavy lifting!
"WELCOME TO THE REAL AMERICA WHERE CRIMINALS GET TO BE
CELEBRITIES AND CELEBRITIES GET AWAY WITH MURDER."
"TO DIE FOR" Columbia Pictures
WHERE BERGER SHOULD BE TOMORROW:
Berger destroyed that evidence solely to protect crimes of Bill Clinton and his administration.
Kerry's plans lack that level of specificty. Berger had to destroy notes that indicated that there was a meeting/conversation between a Clintonista and and Iraqi/Osama rep. prior to 9-11.
The crapweasel mantra in Congress and from their running dogs in the media was an effort to give the connection the "big lie" treatment. Berger tried to destroy the evidence that proved their mendacity.
9-11 could have been prevented! Willie could have prevented it but didn't. And, he intentionally downplayed his failure because that's what he was paid to do!!
WE all need to copy the thread in question to our hard drives just incase these reports from Kerry's web site go the way of the national archivr material.
I love you Thirty. You're the best!
ping
Thanks! I will bookmark.
Thanks for the heads up and the ping.
That thread ain't going to disappear from the good Freepers.
Absolutely, if your great wife had not alerted us, this stuff would have become electronic dust and ions.
Kudos to .30Carbine!
I'd like to give kudos to my wife, .30Carbine, who first exposed this in
post #64 here. 07/20/2004 4:27:39 PM EDT
I love you Thirty. You're the best!
10 posted on 07/22/2004 1:15:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
Foley recalled the final days of the Clinton administration when he said, "And we thought it was bad when they were only stealing furniture."
BWAAHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAH LOL ROFL I can't stop.....LOL
:)
Rush attributes to Levin the idea that the "politically motivated timing" of the leak of the Berger investigation was the trademark of the Clintonistas - and Rush points out that the contents of today's 911 report didn't lay a glove on the Bush Administration, and the Bush Administration knew it in advance because it vetted the report for security violations before it was released.
In short, the Bush Administration had opportunity but not motive to leak the Berger info; OTOH the longer Berger hung around the Kerry campaign the more damage the Berger revelation of it would do when it did come out. So Rush supposes that the leaker of the Berger scandal was a Democrat. But if it was a Clintonista that would, seemingly, poke a hole in the theory that the Clintons want Kerry to lose so Hillary can run in '08 . . .
These conspiracy theories get complicated.
Great work by everyone involved! The left is ready to implode.
Can this be the same John Kerry who said during Abu Ghraib that if he were president he would not be "the last to know what is going on in my command," a criticism of the Bush administration's handling of reports of abuse of prisoners held by U.S. forces in Iraq.'
The latest Kerry flip-flop.
The Kerry plan could have been written by anyone even marginally conversant in security policy and familiar with the rhetoric. But Kerry's so clueless he probably really does think that Berger's stolen classified info played some role, so he had the plan taken off his website.
That's not to say Berger didn't share info improperly with Kerry, but there's nothing classified in this particular document.
IMHO, Democrats are already seeing this as a chance to trade a big scandal for a little one. If they can pawn off the Kerry plan as the material Berger took, they win. Once the public sees what a snooze it is, Clinton's home free. As you point out, what Berger was after was far, far more serious and involved the clintons with great specificity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.